Les droits subjectifs inclusifs en droits belge, français et américain Analyse à partir du droit aux choses communes (y compris la public trust doctrine), du droit à l’usage des voies publiques et du droit aux biens communaux

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW European Review of Private Law Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.54648/erpl2020062
J. Van de Voorde
{"title":"Les droits subjectifs inclusifs en droits belge, français et américain Analyse à partir du droit aux choses communes (y compris la public trust doctrine), du droit à l’usage des voies publiques et du droit aux biens communaux","authors":"J. Van de Voorde","doi":"10.54648/erpl2020062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The search for instruments to protect the environment has lead to the rediscovery of some ancient legal concepts, notably the res communes in the sense of article 714 of the Belgian and French Civil Code (Article 3.43 of the new Belgian Civil Code) and the public trust doctrine in United States law. The res communes are things which cannot be appropriated by anyone (such as water in rivers and seas, atmospheric air, nature and several components of nature), on which each therefore has a subjective right of use and enjoyment. This subjective right is protected, as are all subjective rights, by a cause of action (even independent of any tort). The fact that the right concerning res communes or the public trust benefit in principle everyone has interesting implications: it is not an exclusive subjective right, but an inclusive subjective right. The category of inclusive subjective rights is rather unknown and neglected in legal analysis. This contribution analyses this category, firstly identifying some inclusive subjective rights (next to the res communes and the public trust, it studies in the first place the rights to use public highways and more generally government property destined for public use (domaine public) and in the second place the collective rights of inhabitants of local communities to certain goods held by the incorporated community). It analyses then some of the general principles of their legal status, followed by an examination of their protection by legal action before the courts.\nEnvironmental protection - res communes - subjective rights - French law - Belgian law - Code Napoléon - inclusivity - inclusive subjective rights - exclusivity - public trust doctrine","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2020062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The search for instruments to protect the environment has lead to the rediscovery of some ancient legal concepts, notably the res communes in the sense of article 714 of the Belgian and French Civil Code (Article 3.43 of the new Belgian Civil Code) and the public trust doctrine in United States law. The res communes are things which cannot be appropriated by anyone (such as water in rivers and seas, atmospheric air, nature and several components of nature), on which each therefore has a subjective right of use and enjoyment. This subjective right is protected, as are all subjective rights, by a cause of action (even independent of any tort). The fact that the right concerning res communes or the public trust benefit in principle everyone has interesting implications: it is not an exclusive subjective right, but an inclusive subjective right. The category of inclusive subjective rights is rather unknown and neglected in legal analysis. This contribution analyses this category, firstly identifying some inclusive subjective rights (next to the res communes and the public trust, it studies in the first place the rights to use public highways and more generally government property destined for public use (domaine public) and in the second place the collective rights of inhabitants of local communities to certain goods held by the incorporated community). It analyses then some of the general principles of their legal status, followed by an examination of their protection by legal action before the courts. Environmental protection - res communes - subjective rights - French law - Belgian law - Code Napoléon - inclusivity - inclusive subjective rights - exclusivity - public trust doctrine
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比利时、法国和美国法律中的主观包容性权利,从公共物品权(包括公共信托原则)、公共道路使用权和公共财产权进行分析
在寻找保护环境的文书的过程中,重新发现了一些古老的法律概念,特别是《比利时和法国民法典》第714条意义上的公社(新《比利时民法典》第3.43条)和美国法律中的公共信托原则。公有物是任何人都不能占有的东西(如江河和海洋中的水、大气、自然和自然的若干组成部分),因此每个人都有使用和享受这些东西的主观权利。与所有主观权利一样,这种主观权利受到诉因的保护(甚至独立于任何侵权行为)。关于公有财产或公共信托的权利原则上对所有人都有利,这一事实具有有趣的含义:它不是一种排他性的主观权利,而是一种包容性的主观权利。包容性主观权利的范畴在法律分析中是相当不为人所知和忽视的。这篇文章分析了这一类别,首先确定了一些包容性的主观权利(在公社和公共信托之外,它首先研究了使用公共公路的权利和更普遍的用于公共用途的政府财产(公有领地),其次研究了当地社区居民对合并社区持有的某些商品的集体权利)。然后分析了其法律地位的一些一般原则,然后审查了法院对其采取的法律行动的保护。环境保护。共同体。主观权利。法国法。比利时法。那不勒斯法典。包容性。包容性主观权利。排他性。公共信托原则
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Dealing With the Unpredictable: The Impact of the Covid-19 Crisis on Lease Agreements in the Italian and Japanese Legal Systems The CISG and European Private Law: When in Rome, Do as the Romans Do In memoriam Rodolfo Sacco Der Allgemeine Teil des neuen chinesischen Zivilgesetzbuchs im Vergleich zum deutschen BGB (Teil 1): Eine rechtswissenschaftliche und -terminologische Untersuchung der Rechtssubjektsregelungen Subrogation: An Unidentified Legal Object? A Proposal for a Solution to the Renowned Problem of the Legal Construction of Subrogation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1