首页 > 最新文献

European Review of Private Law最新文献

英文 中文
The CISG and European Private Law: When in Rome, Do as the Romans Do 《销售公约》与欧洲私法:入乡随俗
IF 0.3 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2022039
Ingeborg Schwenzer, Patrick Wittum
The greatest success of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) is probably the strong influence it has exerted on law reformers both at the domestic and the international level. Since its coming into force, there have been significant reforms of European private law through harmonization efforts of the European Union and legislative activities of its Member States. This article shows that there is a strong trend for their modernizations in the area of sale of goods and contract law to follow the solutions found under the CISG, especially concerning the definition of non-conformity and damages based on strict liability coupled with a foreseeability requirement. There are also occasional improvements like the exemption for impediments beyond the obligor’s control barring both damages and explicitly also specific performance or the open recognition of gain-based damages. Still, some departures from the solutions of the CISG need to be criticized, amongst others narrow definitions of the concept of sale of goods, the foreseeability limitation for damages not applying in cases of gross negligence or fraud, and separate provisions for cases of hardship.
《国际货物销售合同公约》(《销售公约》)最大的成功可能是它对国内和国际一级的法律改革者产生了强大的影响。自其生效以来,通过欧洲联盟的协调努力及其成员国的立法活动,对欧洲私法进行了重大改革。这篇文章表明,在货物销售和合同法领域,有一种强烈的现代化趋势,即遵循《销售公约》下的解决方案,特别是在不符合规定和基于严格责任和可预见性要求的损害赔偿的定义方面。偶尔也会有一些改进,比如对债务人无法控制的障碍的豁免,既禁止损害赔偿,也明确禁止具体履行或公开承认基于收益的损害赔偿。尽管如此,一些偏离《销售公约》解决方案的做法仍需受到批评,其中包括对货物销售概念的狭义定义、对重大过失或欺诈案件不适用的损害的可预见性限制,以及对困难案件的单独规定。
{"title":"The CISG and European Private Law: When in Rome, Do as the Romans Do","authors":"Ingeborg Schwenzer, Patrick Wittum","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022039","url":null,"abstract":"The greatest success of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) is probably the strong influence it has exerted on law reformers both at the domestic and the international level. Since its coming into force, there have been significant reforms of European private law through harmonization efforts of the European Union and legislative activities of its Member States. This article shows that there is a strong trend for their modernizations in the area of sale of goods and contract law to follow the solutions found under the CISG, especially concerning the definition of non-conformity and damages based on strict liability coupled with a foreseeability requirement. There are also occasional improvements like the exemption for impediments beyond the obligor’s control barring both damages and explicitly also specific performance or the open recognition of gain-based damages. Still, some departures from the solutions of the CISG need to be criticized, amongst others narrow definitions of the concept of sale of goods, the foreseeability limitation for damages not applying in cases of gross negligence or fraud, and separate provisions for cases of hardship.","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44033242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Subrogation: An Unidentified Legal Object? A Proposal for a Solution to the Renowned Problem of the Legal Construction of Subrogation 代位权:一个无法确定的法律对象?关于解决代位权法律建设中的突出问题的建议
IF 0.3 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2022034
Ekin Korkmaz
Subrogation, originating from Roman law, is an institution adopted in civil law jurisdictions with minor differences. According to the general definition and understanding, subrogation means the legal (ipso iure) transfer of the creditor’s right to claim to the third-party, who performs someone else’s debt, for granting him/her a privileged legal status in his (recourse) relationship with the debtor. The privileged legal status of the third-party, who benefits from the subrogation, lies in the legal transfer of accessory and priority rights arising out of the right to claim. Because of its exceptional feature, considerable efforts have been made to explain the legal nature of subrogation. However, because of its complexity, there is still no consensus on the issue. There are even views implying that subrogation is an unidentified legal object.The author suggests an explanation to the construction of subrogation in three main steps:(1) Parallel to the prevailing view regarding performance of the third-party, it should be accepted that the will of the third-party is decisive concerning the legal consequences of the performance.(2) Then it should be assumed that the third-party performs the debtor’s debt with the will to acquire (causa acquirendi) in addition to the will to discharge the debtor’s debt (causa solvendi) so that his performance can result in subrogation.(3) Finally, the ‘third-party’ should be redefined in the cases of subrogation.Alongside these steps, the construction of subrogation is based on the theory that a debt may only terminate when its inherent purpose is realized. Therefore, in cases of subrogation, the right to claim continues to exist even after the third-party’s performance with the purpose of serving the right to recourse. This purpose also limits the thirdparty’s powers.This article examines the subrogation’s legal construction by explaining the abovementioned concepts and determining their connections.
代位权起源于罗马法,是民法管辖区采用的一种制度,有细微的区别。根据一般定义和理解,代位权是指债权人将债权合法转让给履行他人债务的第三方,使其在与债务人的(追索权)关系中享有特权法律地位。从代位权中受益的第三人的特权法律地位在于由请求权产生的附属权利和优先权的合法转让。由于代位权的特殊性,人们对代位权的法律性质进行了大量的解释。然而,由于其复杂性,在这个问题上仍然没有达成共识。甚至有观点暗示代位求偿权是一个未确定的法律对象。笔者建议从三个主要步骤来解释代位权的构建:(1)与关于第三人履行的普遍观点相平行,应当承认第三人的意愿对履行的法律后果具有决定性。(2) 那么,应该假设第三方履行债务人的债务时,除了履行债务人债务的意愿(causa solvendi)外,还具有取得意愿(causha acquivendi),这样他的履行就可以产生代位权。(3) 最后,在代位求偿的情况下,应当重新定义“第三方”。除了这些步骤之外,代位权的构建还基于这样一种理论,即债务只有在其固有目的实现时才能终止。因此,在代位求偿的情况下,即使在第三方以行使追索权为目的履行之后,索赔权仍然存在。这一目的也限制了第三方的权力。本文通过对上述概念的阐释,确定其联系,来考察代位权的法律建构。
{"title":"Subrogation: An Unidentified Legal Object? A Proposal for a Solution to the Renowned Problem of the Legal Construction of Subrogation","authors":"Ekin Korkmaz","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022034","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022034","url":null,"abstract":"Subrogation, originating from Roman law, is an institution adopted in civil law jurisdictions with minor differences. According to the general definition and understanding, subrogation means the legal (ipso iure) transfer of the creditor’s right to claim to the third-party, who performs someone else’s debt, for granting him/her a privileged legal status in his (recourse) relationship with the debtor. The privileged legal status of the third-party, who benefits from the subrogation, lies in the legal transfer of accessory and priority rights arising out of the right to claim. Because of its exceptional feature, considerable efforts have been made to explain the legal nature of subrogation. However, because of its complexity, there is still no consensus on the issue. There are even views implying that subrogation is an unidentified legal object.\u0000The author suggests an explanation to the construction of subrogation in three main steps:\u0000(1) Parallel to the prevailing view regarding performance of the third-party, it should be accepted that the will of the third-party is decisive concerning the legal consequences of the performance.\u0000(2) Then it should be assumed that the third-party performs the debtor’s debt with the will to acquire (causa acquirendi) in addition to the will to discharge the debtor’s debt (causa solvendi) so that his performance can result in subrogation.\u0000(3) Finally, the ‘third-party’ should be redefined in the cases of subrogation.\u0000Alongside these steps, the construction of subrogation is based on the theory that a debt may only terminate when its inherent purpose is realized. Therefore, in cases of subrogation, the right to claim continues to exist even after the third-party’s performance with the purpose of serving the right to recourse. This purpose also limits the thirdparty’s powers.\u0000This article examines the subrogation’s legal construction by explaining the abovementioned concepts and determining their connections.","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46682404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Letter of Intent: To Be Bound or Not to Be Bound, that Is the Question 意向书:受约束还是不受约束,这就是问题所在
IF 0.3 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2022035
Thibaut Verhofstede
The letter of intent is a broadly used tool in different negotiations throughout the entire world. The legal implications of these documents however aren’t always clear. Depending on ‘the content of the letter of intent as a whole, in combination with the factual circumstances’, a letter can be solely morally binding, establish some juridically binding obligations or even constitute the envisaged, final agreement. Various research has been conducted on these possible (civil) legal effects. Less clear remains the factual interpretation leading to these legal effects. How do judges interpret ‘the content of the letter as a whole, together with all the factual circumstances’? Essential in this perspective are elements emphasizing a binding intention of the parties, the animus contrahendi. This article contains a concise synopsis of the most prominent case law on the matter in Belgium, France and the Netherlands. In their pursuit for the true intention of the parties involved, courts appear to rely on certain factual indicators. What are those factors, which bearing should be given to them and what perils must negotiators anticipate on?
意向书是世界各地各种谈判中广泛使用的工具。然而,这些文件的法律含义并不总是很清楚。根据“意向书的整体内容,结合实际情况”,意向书可以仅具有道德约束力,也可以建立一些具有法律约束力的义务,甚至可以构成设想的最终协议。对这些可能的(民事)法律效果进行了各种研究。不太清楚的是导致这些法律效果的事实解释。法官如何将“信函的内容作为一个整体,连同所有的事实情况”来解释?从这个角度来看,强调双方具有约束力的意图的要素是至关重要的,即缔约意向书。本文简要介绍了比利时、法国和荷兰在这一问题上最突出的判例法。在寻求有关各方的真实意图时,法院似乎依赖某些事实指标。这些因素是什么?应该给予它们什么样的重视?谈判者必须预见哪些危险?
{"title":"The Letter of Intent: To Be Bound or Not to Be Bound, that Is the Question","authors":"Thibaut Verhofstede","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022035","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022035","url":null,"abstract":"The letter of intent is a broadly used tool in different negotiations throughout the entire world. The legal implications of these documents however aren’t always clear. Depending on ‘the content of the letter of intent as a whole, in combination with the factual circumstances’, a letter can be solely morally binding, establish some juridically binding obligations or even constitute the envisaged, final agreement. Various research has been conducted on these possible (civil) legal effects. Less clear remains the factual interpretation leading to these legal effects. How do judges interpret ‘the content of the letter as a whole, together with all the factual circumstances’? Essential in this perspective are elements emphasizing a binding intention of the parties, the animus contrahendi. This article contains a concise synopsis of the most prominent case law on the matter in Belgium, France and the Netherlands. In their pursuit for the true intention of the parties involved, courts appear to rely on certain factual indicators. What are those factors, which bearing should be given to them and what perils must negotiators anticipate on?","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48542800","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Der Allgemeine Teil des neuen chinesischen Zivilgesetzbuchs im Vergleich zum deutschen BGB (Teil 1): Eine rechtswissenschaftliche und -terminologische Untersuchung der Rechtssubjektsregelungen 新中国民法典总则与德国民法典之比较(上):法人规则的法律与术语研究
IF 0.3 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2022036
Qiang Wang
On 1 January 2021, the newly codified Civil Code (CC) came into effect in the People’s Republic of China, having been high on the political and legislative agenda in recent years and approved by the National People’s Congress on 28 May 2020. Since the founding of the People’s Republic (1949), numerous attempts have been made to codify its civil law. The CC is undoubtedly a landmark in China’s overall legal history, particularly with regard to civil law legislation, which, in contrast to the country’s long and turbulent history, had only begun in the late Qing Dynasty (1911). Preceding the enactment of the CCL, the General Part of the Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China, to which the CC’s General Part is basically identical, had already been adopted and enacted in 2017. With this step, China’s legislators succeeded in replacing the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China, which by then were already 31 years old, together with their supreme court interpretation, and finally set the course for the codification of the People’s Republic of China’s civil law. In view of the codificationhistorical and jurisprudential position of the CC’s General Part in China’s civil law and of the new codification as a whole, it is appropriate to present it to German-speaking and international legal experts, primarily in comparison with the General Part of the German Civil Code, which served or will serve as the most important foreign source of knowledge in the creation of the CC and in its application-related optimization. In this respect, this treatise, consisting of two parts, appreciates the renewal achievements of the CC’s General Part and examines its regulations in a comparative legal manner, focusing on the legal subjects, civil rights, legal transactions (including representation) and civil liability in terms of legal doctrine, technology and concepts.
2021年1月1日,新编纂的民法典在中华人民共和国生效,近年来一直是政治和立法议程上的重要内容,并于2020年5月28日经全国人民代表大会批准。中华人民共和国成立以来(1949年),对民法进行了多次编纂。CC无疑是中国整体法律史上的一个里程碑,尤其是在民法立法方面,与中国漫长而动荡的历史形成鲜明对比的是,民法立法始于晚清(1911年)。在CCL颁布之前,《中华人民共和国民法通则》已于2017年通过并颁布,与《中国民法通则》的总则基本相同。通过这一步骤,中国立法者成功地取代了当时已有31年历史的《中华人民共和国民法通则》及其最高法院的解释,并最终为中华人民共和国民法的编纂奠定了基础。鉴于《中华人民共和国民法典通则》在中国民法和整个新法典编纂中的编纂历史和法理地位,将其提交给德语和国际法律专家是合适的,主要是与《德国民法典通则》进行比较,其在CC的创建及其应用相关优化中起到或将起到最重要的外国知识来源的作用。在这方面,本论文由两部分组成,对CC总则的更新成就表示赞赏,并以比较法律的方式审视其规定,从法律理论、技术和概念的角度重点关注法律主体、民事权利、法律交易(包括代理)和民事责任。
{"title":"Der Allgemeine Teil des neuen chinesischen Zivilgesetzbuchs im Vergleich zum deutschen BGB (Teil 1): Eine rechtswissenschaftliche und -terminologische Untersuchung der Rechtssubjektsregelungen","authors":"Qiang Wang","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022036","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022036","url":null,"abstract":"On 1 January 2021, the newly codified Civil Code (CC) came into effect in the People’s Republic of China, having been high on the political and legislative agenda in recent years and approved by the National People’s Congress on 28 May 2020. Since the founding of the People’s Republic (1949), numerous attempts have been made to codify its civil law. The CC is undoubtedly a landmark in China’s overall legal history, particularly with regard to civil law legislation, which, in contrast to the country’s long and turbulent history, had only begun in the late Qing Dynasty (1911). Preceding the enactment of the CCL, the General Part of the Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China, to which the CC’s General Part is basically identical, had already been adopted and enacted in 2017. With this step, China’s legislators succeeded in replacing the General Principles of the Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China, which by then were already 31 years old, together with their supreme court interpretation, and finally set the course for the codification of the People’s Republic of China’s civil law. In view of the codificationhistorical and jurisprudential position of the CC’s General Part in China’s civil law and of the new codification as a whole, it is appropriate to present it to German-speaking and international legal experts, primarily in comparison with the General Part of the German Civil Code, which served or will serve as the most important foreign source of knowledge in the creation of the CC and in its application-related optimization. In this respect, this treatise, consisting of two parts, appreciates the renewal achievements of the CC’s General Part and examines its regulations in a comparative legal manner, focusing on the legal subjects, civil rights, legal transactions (including representation) and civil liability in terms of legal doctrine, technology and concepts.","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45343361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Contract Law Approach for the Treatment of Smart Contracts’ ‘Bugs’ 处理智能合约“漏洞”的合同法方法
IF 0.3 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2022037
E. Rizos
This article attempts to derive some principles concerning the legal treatment of bugs in smart contracts, namely errors in the smart contract code which may result to some unwanted or unexpected outcome at the execution of the contract. Before dealing with this main issue, the article concludes that despite the practical issues that arise concerning the application of traditional contract law rules and principles, these rules remain relevant, and that a smart contract is typically (but not necessarily) a mere tool for the performance of the contract and not a legal contract itself. Therefore, typically, bugs in smart contracts should be examined under the doctrines of the breach of contract and/or the unfair enrichment and not as reasons for any potential invalidity of the contract. Only in (rather unlikely cases) where a smart contract could be indeed perceived as the body of the legal contract itself, printing errors in the code or other expressional mistakes concerning the semantics of the code (albeit not its function) could be perceived as potential reasons for the invalidity of the contract, according to the relevant rules of each jurisdiction. Nevertheless, even in these cases, interpretation of the contract with objective standards should not be ruled out, even when the contract is concluded by means of artificial intelligence (AI). The article examines also contributory negligence issues.
本文试图推导出一些关于智能合约漏洞的法律处理原则,即智能合约代码中的错误,这些错误可能会在合同执行过程中导致一些不必要或意外的结果。在处理这一主要问题之前,文章得出结论,尽管在适用传统合同法规则和原则方面出现了实际问题,但这些规则仍然具有相关性,智能合同通常(但不一定)只是履行合同的工具,而不是法律合同本身。因此,通常情况下,智能合约中的漏洞应根据违约和/或不当得利的理论进行审查,而不是作为合同潜在无效的理由。根据每个司法管辖区的相关规则,只有在智能合同确实可以被视为法律合同本身的主体的情况下(相当不可能的情况),代码中的印刷错误或与代码语义(尽管不是其功能)有关的其他表述错误才能被视为合同无效的潜在原因。然而,即使在这些情况下,也不应排除以客观标准解释合同的可能性,即使合同是通过人工智能订立的。这篇文章还探讨了共同过失问题。
{"title":"A Contract Law Approach for the Treatment of Smart Contracts’ ‘Bugs’","authors":"E. Rizos","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022037","url":null,"abstract":"This article attempts to derive some principles concerning the legal treatment of bugs in smart contracts, namely errors in the smart contract code which may result to some unwanted or unexpected outcome at the execution of the contract. Before dealing with this main issue, the article concludes that despite the practical issues that arise concerning the application of traditional contract law rules and principles, these rules remain relevant, and that a smart contract is typically (but not necessarily) a mere tool for the performance of the contract and not a legal contract itself. Therefore, typically, bugs in smart contracts should be examined under the doctrines of the breach of contract and/or the unfair enrichment and not as reasons for any potential invalidity of the contract. Only in (rather unlikely cases) where a smart contract could be indeed perceived as the body of the legal contract itself, printing errors in the code or other expressional mistakes concerning the semantics of the code (albeit not its function) could be perceived as potential reasons for the invalidity of the contract, according to the relevant rules of each jurisdiction. Nevertheless, even in these cases, interpretation of the contract with objective standards should not be ruled out, even when the contract is concluded by means of artificial intelligence (AI). The article examines also contributory negligence issues.","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46739750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Dealing With the Unpredictable: The Impact of the Covid-19 Crisis on Lease Agreements in the Italian and Japanese Legal Systems 应对不可预测:新冠肺炎危机对意大利和日本法律体系租赁协议的影响
IF 0.3 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2022040
Alba F. Fondrieschi
Lease contracts have been among the most affected by the economic effects of the pandemic in many countries around the world. Measures aimed at containing the virus and the economic crisis following Covid-19 impacted the solvency of individuals and businesses and restricted or prevented access to business premises for some time. This has resulted in delays and defaults in rent payment and claims for rent reduction. The Japanese and Italian legal systems have both addressed these issues by adopting different approaches. This article aims at comparing both systems, by testing the adequacy of the legal provisions in dealing with the consequences of the Covid-19 crisis. An important role in this regard has been played by the respective doctrines of changed circumstances. The article shows how the rules of the Italian legal system have not proved adequate, have brought about considerable litigation, which in turn has led to conflicting judgments. On the other hand, the Japanese legal system seems to have responded better, as litigation has been more limited and court decisions have been based on uniform principles and rules. The comparison of the two legal systems suggests that the best rules to govern supervening circumstances are those which favour a case-by case please insert caseby- case assessment and encourage spontaneous renegotiation of the contract. The article also raises the question of whether predictability should always be regarded as a value in our legal systems and whether the law is moving toward a more contextual approach.
在世界上许多国家,租赁合同是受疫情经济影响最严重的合同之一。旨在遏制病毒和新冠肺炎后经济危机的措施影响了个人和企业的偿付能力,并在一段时间内限制或阻止进入商业场所。这导致拖欠和拖欠租金,并要求减少租金。日本和意大利的法律制度都通过采取不同的方法来处理这些问题。本文旨在通过检验在应对新冠肺炎危机后果方面法律规定的充分性,对两种制度进行比较。在这方面,不同情况下的各自理论发挥了重要作用。这篇文章显示了意大利法律制度的规则是如何证明不充分的,导致了大量的诉讼,这反过来又导致了相互矛盾的判决。另一方面,日本的法律制度似乎做出了更好的反应,因为诉讼更有限,法院判决基于统一的原则和规则。两种法律制度的比较表明,管理监督情况的最佳规则是那些有利于逐案评估和鼓励自发重新谈判合同的规则。这篇文章还提出了一个问题,即在我们的法律体系中,可预见性是否应该始终被视为一种价值,以及法律是否正朝着更加情境化的方向发展。
{"title":"Dealing With the Unpredictable: The Impact of the Covid-19 Crisis on Lease Agreements in the Italian and Japanese Legal Systems","authors":"Alba F. Fondrieschi","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022040","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022040","url":null,"abstract":"Lease contracts have been among the most affected by the economic effects of the pandemic in many countries around the world. Measures aimed at containing the virus and the economic crisis following Covid-19 impacted the solvency of individuals and businesses and restricted or prevented access to business premises for some time. This has resulted in delays and defaults in rent payment and claims for rent reduction. The Japanese and Italian legal systems have both addressed these issues by adopting different approaches. This article aims at comparing both systems, by testing the adequacy of the legal provisions in dealing with the consequences of the Covid-19 crisis. An important role in this regard has been played by the respective doctrines of changed circumstances. The article shows how the rules of the Italian legal system have not proved adequate, have brought about considerable litigation, which in turn has led to conflicting judgments. On the other hand, the Japanese legal system seems to have responded better, as litigation has been more limited and court decisions have been based on uniform principles and rules. The comparison of the two legal systems suggests that the best rules to govern supervening circumstances are those which favour a case-by case please insert caseby- case assessment and encourage spontaneous renegotiation of the contract. The article also raises the question of whether predictability should always be regarded as a value in our legal systems and whether the law is moving toward a more contextual approach.","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42063243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
In memoriam Rodolfo Sacco 纪念鲁道夫·萨科
IF 0.3 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2022033
B. Pozzo
{"title":"In memoriam Rodolfo Sacco","authors":"B. Pozzo","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022033","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45032376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The AI Act and Its Impact on Product Safety, Contracts and Liability AI法案及其对产品安全、合同和责任的影响
IF 0.3 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2022038
Tycho de Graaf, G. Veldt
On 21 April 2021, the European Commission presented a proposal for an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act. The proposal’s aim is to address the risks associated with the placement and putting into service of an AI system on the EU market. In this contribution the Draft Regulation, its relationship to existing product safety law and its consequences for the private law liability of providers and users are assessed. More in particular, the proposed risk-based approach is explained, high-risk AI systems are discussed in more detail and what the implications of this public law instrument are for the private law contractual relationships and liability of the provider and user of an AI system.
2021年4月21日,欧盟委员会提交了《人工智能法》提案。该提案的目的是解决人工智能系统在欧盟市场上的部署和投入使用的相关风险。在这篇文章中,对《条例草案》及其与现行产品安全法的关系及其对供应商和用户私法责任的影响进行了评估。更特别的是,解释了拟议的基于风险的方法,更详细地讨论了高风险人工智能系统,以及这一公法文书对人工智能系统的提供者和使用者的私法合同关系和责任的影响。
{"title":"The AI Act and Its Impact on Product Safety, Contracts and Liability","authors":"Tycho de Graaf, G. Veldt","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022038","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022038","url":null,"abstract":"On 21 April 2021, the European Commission presented a proposal for an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Act. The proposal’s aim is to address the risks associated with the placement and putting into service of an AI system on the EU market. In this contribution the Draft Regulation, its relationship to existing product safety law and its consequences for the private law liability of providers and users are assessed. More in particular, the proposed risk-based approach is explained, high-risk AI systems are discussed in more detail and what the implications of this public law instrument are for the private law contractual relationships and liability of the provider and user of an AI system.","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49328332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editorial: On Old or New Rules for New Problems or Old Problems 社论:关于新问题和老问题的新旧规则
IF 0.3 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2022032
M. Storme
{"title":"Editorial: On Old or New Rules for New Problems or Old Problems","authors":"M. Storme","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022032","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022032","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49131956","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Conforming Interpretation 一致性解释
IF 0.3 Q4 LAW Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI: 10.54648/erpl2022031
Leone Niglia
It is still assumed in scholarship that ‘contra legem’ characterizes the Court of Justice of the European Union case law on conforming interpretation. This article argues, through a new reading of the relevant CJEU jurisprudence, that the case law on conforming interpretation has been taking a new direction away from ‘contra legem’. A critique of the new jurisprudence is then proposed through pointing to two unrenounceable virtues of the ‘contra legem’ requirement – towards making scholarship aware of the urgent need to take seriously, and critically face, the new jurisprudence.
学术界仍然认为,“反法”是欧洲联盟法院关于一致性解释的判例法的特点。本文认为,通过对欧盟法院相关判例的重新解读,关于一致性解释的判例法已经从“反法”走向了一个新的方向。然后,通过指出“反法”要求的两个不可忽视的优点——让学术界意识到迫切需要认真对待和批判性地面对新法学,对新法学提出了批评。
{"title":"Conforming Interpretation","authors":"Leone Niglia","doi":"10.54648/erpl2022031","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2022031","url":null,"abstract":"It is still assumed in scholarship that ‘contra legem’ characterizes the Court of Justice of the European Union case law on conforming interpretation. This article argues, through a new reading of the relevant CJEU jurisprudence, that the case law on conforming interpretation has been taking a new direction away from ‘contra legem’. A critique of the new jurisprudence is then proposed through pointing to two unrenounceable virtues of the ‘contra legem’ requirement – towards making scholarship aware of the urgent need to take seriously, and critically face, the new jurisprudence.","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41758387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
European Review of Private Law
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1