Cut-off Score of Indonesian Version of Sensorimotor History Questionnaire for Preschooler and Soft Sign Cambridge Neurological Inventory against Intelligent Quotient

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Majalah Kedokteran Bandung-MKB-Bandung Medical Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.15395/mkb.v53n4.2420
S. Sobana, Tiara Pramaesya, U. Gamayani, L. Amalia, Suryani Gunadharma, A. B. P. Birawa
{"title":"Cut-off Score of Indonesian Version of Sensorimotor History Questionnaire for Preschooler and Soft Sign Cambridge Neurological Inventory against Intelligent Quotient","authors":"S. Sobana, Tiara Pramaesya, U. Gamayani, L. Amalia, Suryani Gunadharma, A. B. P. Birawa","doi":"10.15395/mkb.v53n4.2420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early detection of Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD) is important for deciding on appropriate interventions for children at risk. However, there is no valid screening tool available at this moment. The purpose of this study was to validate the deGangi, Sensorimotor History Questionnaire for Preschooler (SHQP), and neurological soft sign of Cambridge Neurological Inventory (NSS CNI) against intelligent quotient (IQ) to establish a reliable cutoff for SPD screening tools for children aged 4–6 years. Sixty-four parent-child were recruited randomly from 3 kindergartens in Bandung, Indonesia. Eligible parents were asked to fill out the SHQP, while their child was assessed using theWechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligent (WPPSI) and NSS CNI. The deGangi SHQP score and NSS CNI showed a weak and moderate correlation with Full-scale IQ (FIQ). The total score of deGangi SHQP’s sensitivity was 50% with a specificity of 53.4% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.2% agaisnt the FIQ score. The total sensitivity for the NSS CNI was 66.7%, while the total specificity was 58.6% and the NPV was 94.4%. Meanwhile, the sensitivity for the sensory integration subscale score of the NSS CNI was 83.3%, with a specificity of 60.3% and an NPV of 97.2%. The deGangi SHQP can be considered to be an SPD screening tool with the cut-off scores for each subscale of self-regulation, sensory processing of touch, sensory processing of movement, emotional maturity, and motor maturity of 3, 3, 3, and 2, respectively, while the NSS CNI can be used for identifying SPD in children aged 4–6 years with a cut-off scores for the motor coordination, sensory integration, and disinhibition subscales of 7, 10, and 3, respectively.","PeriodicalId":40791,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Kedokteran Bandung-MKB-Bandung Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Kedokteran Bandung-MKB-Bandung Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15395/mkb.v53n4.2420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Early detection of Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD) is important for deciding on appropriate interventions for children at risk. However, there is no valid screening tool available at this moment. The purpose of this study was to validate the deGangi, Sensorimotor History Questionnaire for Preschooler (SHQP), and neurological soft sign of Cambridge Neurological Inventory (NSS CNI) against intelligent quotient (IQ) to establish a reliable cutoff for SPD screening tools for children aged 4–6 years. Sixty-four parent-child were recruited randomly from 3 kindergartens in Bandung, Indonesia. Eligible parents were asked to fill out the SHQP, while their child was assessed using theWechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligent (WPPSI) and NSS CNI. The deGangi SHQP score and NSS CNI showed a weak and moderate correlation with Full-scale IQ (FIQ). The total score of deGangi SHQP’s sensitivity was 50% with a specificity of 53.4% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.2% agaisnt the FIQ score. The total sensitivity for the NSS CNI was 66.7%, while the total specificity was 58.6% and the NPV was 94.4%. Meanwhile, the sensitivity for the sensory integration subscale score of the NSS CNI was 83.3%, with a specificity of 60.3% and an NPV of 97.2%. The deGangi SHQP can be considered to be an SPD screening tool with the cut-off scores for each subscale of self-regulation, sensory processing of touch, sensory processing of movement, emotional maturity, and motor maturity of 3, 3, 3, and 2, respectively, while the NSS CNI can be used for identifying SPD in children aged 4–6 years with a cut-off scores for the motor coordination, sensory integration, and disinhibition subscales of 7, 10, and 3, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印尼语版学龄前儿童感觉运动史问卷与软手语剑桥神经系统智商量表的分界点
早期发现感觉加工障碍(SPD)对于决定对有风险的儿童进行适当的干预很重要。然而,目前还没有有效的筛查工具。本研究的目的是验证deGangi、学龄前儿童感觉运动史问卷(SHQP)和剑桥神经系统量表(NSS-CNI)的神经软征与智商的对比,以确定4-6岁儿童SPD筛查工具的可靠截止值。从印度尼西亚万隆的3所幼儿园随机抽取64名亲子。符合条件的父母被要求填写SHQP,而他们的孩子则使用韦克斯勒学前和小学智能量表(WPPSI)和NSS CNI进行评估。deGangi SHQP评分和NSS CNI与全量表IQ(FIQ)呈弱相关和中度相关。deGangi SHQP的敏感性总分为50%,特异性为53.4%,对FIQ评分的阴性预测值(NPV)为91.2%。NSS-CNI的总灵敏度为66.7%,总特异性为58.6%,NPV为94.4%。同时,NSS-CNI的感觉统合分量表得分的灵敏度为83.3%,特异性为60.3%,NPV值为97.2%。deGangi SHQP可以被认为是一种SPD筛选工具,其每个自我调节分量表的截止得分为,触觉感觉处理、运动感觉处理、情绪成熟度和运动成熟度分别为3、3、3和2,而NSS CNI可用于识别4-6岁儿童的SPD,运动协调、感觉统合和去抑制分量表的截止分数分别为7、10和3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Outcome of High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) for Severe COVID-19 Patients in Isolation Intensive Care Unit Diagnostic Challenge of Adult-onset Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus in a Remote Hospital Effective Visual Media to Increase Knowledge and Comprehension of Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis Among Patients and Their Caregivers Drug Interactions in Diabetic Ulcer Patients in an Indonesian Private Hospital Effectiveness of WHO Stress Management for Improving Insomnia Severity Index Score in Telegram’s Self-Isolated Online Group Population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1