Tranexamic acid vs placebo and its impact on bleeding, transfusions and stone-free rates in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

D. Hinojosa-González, E. Flores-Villalba, B. Eisner, D. Olvera-Posada
{"title":"Tranexamic acid vs placebo and its impact on bleeding, transfusions and stone-free rates in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"D. Hinojosa-González, E. Flores-Villalba, B. Eisner, D. Olvera-Posada","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2022.0043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard of care for the treatment of large renal stones. Bleeding-related complications remain a major concern when performing this procedure. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has recently been studied in both urologic and non-urologic procedures to reduce bleeding, transfusions and complications. Material and methods In June 2021 a systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines on randomized prospective studies comparing the effects of TXA on bleeding complications during PCNL. Data was analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Results Eight studies were included with a total 1,201 patients, of which 598 received TXA and 603 received placebo. TXA was associated with less bleeding (decreased change in hemoglobin) -0.79 Hb g/dl [-1.09, -0.65] p <.00001 and decreased transfusion rates (OR 0.31 [0.18, 0.52] p <0.0001). This was also associated with lower complication rates, both minor, major and overall, OR 0.59[0.41, .85] p = 0.005, OR 0.31 [0.17, 0.56] p = 0.0001 and OR 0.40 [0.29, 0.56] p <0.00001 respectively. TXA was also associated with improved stone-free rates as compared with placebo (OR 1.79 [1.23, 2.62] p = 0.003). TXA resulted in shorter operative times (11.51 minutes [-16.25, -6.77] p =.001) and length of stay (-0.74 days [-1.13 -0.34] p = 0.0006). Two pulmonary embolisms were registered in a single study in the TXA group. Conclusions In this meta-analysis, the use of TXA during PCNL was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the following parameters when compared with placebo: change in hemoglobin, transfusion rates, complication rates, operative time, and length of stay. It was also associated with improvement in stone-free rates. These data should be considered by surgeons performing PCNL.","PeriodicalId":86295,"journal":{"name":"Urologia polska","volume":"75 1","pages":"81 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia polska","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2022.0043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard of care for the treatment of large renal stones. Bleeding-related complications remain a major concern when performing this procedure. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has recently been studied in both urologic and non-urologic procedures to reduce bleeding, transfusions and complications. Material and methods In June 2021 a systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines on randomized prospective studies comparing the effects of TXA on bleeding complications during PCNL. Data was analyzed using Review Manager 5.3. Results Eight studies were included with a total 1,201 patients, of which 598 received TXA and 603 received placebo. TXA was associated with less bleeding (decreased change in hemoglobin) -0.79 Hb g/dl [-1.09, -0.65] p <.00001 and decreased transfusion rates (OR 0.31 [0.18, 0.52] p <0.0001). This was also associated with lower complication rates, both minor, major and overall, OR 0.59[0.41, .85] p = 0.005, OR 0.31 [0.17, 0.56] p = 0.0001 and OR 0.40 [0.29, 0.56] p <0.00001 respectively. TXA was also associated with improved stone-free rates as compared with placebo (OR 1.79 [1.23, 2.62] p = 0.003). TXA resulted in shorter operative times (11.51 minutes [-16.25, -6.77] p =.001) and length of stay (-0.74 days [-1.13 -0.34] p = 0.0006). Two pulmonary embolisms were registered in a single study in the TXA group. Conclusions In this meta-analysis, the use of TXA during PCNL was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the following parameters when compared with placebo: change in hemoglobin, transfusion rates, complication rates, operative time, and length of stay. It was also associated with improvement in stone-free rates. These data should be considered by surgeons performing PCNL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氨甲环酸与安慰剂的比较及其对经皮肾取石术中出血、输血和无结石率的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是治疗大肾结石的标准护理方法。出血相关的并发症仍然是执行该手术时的主要问题。氨甲环酸(TXA)最近被研究用于泌尿外科和非泌尿外科手术,以减少出血、输血和并发症。材料和方法在2021年6月,根据PRISMA指南对比较TXA对PCNL期间出血并发症影响的随机前瞻性研究进行了系统评价。使用Review Manager 5.3分析数据。结果纳入8项研究,共1201例患者,其中598例接受TXA治疗,603例接受安慰剂治疗。TXA与出血减少(血红蛋白变化减少)相关-0.79 Hb g/dl [-1.09, -0.65] p <。00001和输血率降低(OR 0.31 [0.18, 0.52] p <0.0001)。这也与较低的并发症发生率相关,无论是轻微的、严重的还是总体的,OR分别为0.59[0.41,0.85]p = 0.005, OR为0.31 [0.17,0.56]p = 0.0001, OR为0.40 [0.29,0.56]p <0.00001。与安慰剂相比,TXA也与改善的无结石率相关(OR为1.79 [1.23,2.62]p = 0.003)。TXA缩短了手术时间(11.51分钟[-16.25,-6.77]p =.001)和住院时间(-0.74天[-1.13 -0.34]p = 0.0006)。TXA组在一项研究中记录了两例肺栓塞。在这项荟萃分析中,与安慰剂相比,PCNL期间使用TXA与以下参数的统计学显著降低相关:血红蛋白变化、输血率、并发症发生率、手术时间和住院时间。它还与结石去除率的提高有关。外科医生在进行PCNL时应考虑这些数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Choosing a path for CEJU Location of ureteral access sheath in the ureter. Does it affect the fluid flow in different calyces? A new era and future of education: the impact of pandemic on online learning - a study from the European School of Urology. Spermatic vein thrombosis as a rare cause of testicular pain - review of the literature. Surgical outcomes of low-power thulium laser enucleation of prostates >80 g. One-year of follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1