Banking and Regulatory Responses to Fintech Revisited—Building the Sustainable Financial Service ‘Ecosystems’ of Tomorrow

Q2 Social Sciences Singapore Journal of Legal Studies Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3446273
M. Fenwick, E. Vermeulen
{"title":"Banking and Regulatory Responses to Fintech Revisited—Building the Sustainable Financial Service ‘Ecosystems’ of Tomorrow","authors":"M. Fenwick, E. Vermeulen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3446273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade, FinTech – broadly defined as the use of new technologies to compete in the marketplace of financial institutions and intermediaries – has disrupted the financial services sector. In this paper, we revisit the question of how banks and regulators should respond. \n \nWe argue that incumbent financial service providers can learn useful lessons from the experience of the most innovative companies and their efforts to navigate the new realities of doing business in a networked age. One of the striking features of successful large businesses with an established track record for sustained innovation has been their capacity to implement effective corporate venturing strategies that continually feed dynamic, technology-driven innovation (“borrowing the startup genie’s magic”). Here, we identify seven corporate venturing strategies adopted by the most innovative companies and argue that incumbent banks could utilize similar strategies in responding to FinTech. A crucial element of these strategies is a recognition of the value of “co-creation,” namely an inclusive, collaborative partnering between incumbents and non-traditional players. To implement this objective, incumbents need to become open “ecosystems” that absorb the skills and resources of the most dynamic startups. We argue that some banks are already moving in this direction and that this trend towards “unbundling” will likely continue. \n \nThe paper ends with a discussion of the implications of such an account for regulators and regulatory design. In order to establish an effective ecosystem, regulators need to become active participants in these new ecosystems. We characterize this approach as “community-driven” regulatory design and identify some key features of such an approach.","PeriodicalId":38330,"journal":{"name":"Singapore Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3446273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Over the last decade, FinTech – broadly defined as the use of new technologies to compete in the marketplace of financial institutions and intermediaries – has disrupted the financial services sector. In this paper, we revisit the question of how banks and regulators should respond. We argue that incumbent financial service providers can learn useful lessons from the experience of the most innovative companies and their efforts to navigate the new realities of doing business in a networked age. One of the striking features of successful large businesses with an established track record for sustained innovation has been their capacity to implement effective corporate venturing strategies that continually feed dynamic, technology-driven innovation (“borrowing the startup genie’s magic”). Here, we identify seven corporate venturing strategies adopted by the most innovative companies and argue that incumbent banks could utilize similar strategies in responding to FinTech. A crucial element of these strategies is a recognition of the value of “co-creation,” namely an inclusive, collaborative partnering between incumbents and non-traditional players. To implement this objective, incumbents need to become open “ecosystems” that absorb the skills and resources of the most dynamic startups. We argue that some banks are already moving in this direction and that this trend towards “unbundling” will likely continue. The paper ends with a discussion of the implications of such an account for regulators and regulatory design. In order to establish an effective ecosystem, regulators need to become active participants in these new ecosystems. We characterize this approach as “community-driven” regulatory design and identify some key features of such an approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
银行业和监管机构对金融科技的回应——构建未来可持续的金融服务“生态系统”
在过去十年中,金融科技(FinTech)——广义地定义为利用新技术在金融机构和中介机构的市场上竞争——颠覆了金融服务业。在本文中,我们重新审视了银行和监管机构应如何应对的问题。我们认为,现有的金融服务提供商可以从最具创新性的公司的经验中学习到有用的教训,以及它们在网络时代开展业务的新现实中所做的努力。拥有持续创新记录的成功大型企业的一个显著特征是,它们有能力实施有效的企业风险战略,不断推动动态的、技术驱动的创新(“借用创业精灵的魔法”)。在这里,我们确定了最具创新性的公司采用的七种企业风险投资策略,并认为现有银行可以利用类似的策略来应对金融科技。这些战略的一个关键要素是认识到“共同创造”的价值,即现有企业和非传统企业之间的包容、合作伙伴关系。为了实现这一目标,现有企业需要成为开放的“生态系统”,吸收最具活力的初创企业的技能和资源。我们认为,一些银行已经在朝着这个方向发展,这种“分拆”的趋势可能会持续下去。本文最后讨论了这种账户对监管机构和监管设计的影响。为了建立一个有效的生态系统,监管机构需要成为这些新生态系统的积极参与者。我们将这种方法描述为“社区驱动”的监管设计,并确定了这种方法的一些关键特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Concept of Money in the 4th Industrial Revolution—A Legal and Economic Analysis Banking and Regulatory Responses to Fintech Revisited—Building the Sustainable Financial Service ‘Ecosystems’ of Tomorrow NUS Law in the Noughties: Becoming ‘Asia’s Global Law School’ Contract as assumption II: Formation, performance and enforcement [Book Review] Between Judicial Oligarchy and Parliamentary Supremacy: Understanding the Court's Dilemma in Constitutional Judicial Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1