Bile Duct Reconstruction after Failed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Literature Review

M. V. Timerbulatov, M. M. Aziev, E. Grishina, T. M. Ziganshin
{"title":"Bile Duct Reconstruction after Failed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Literature Review","authors":"M. V. Timerbulatov, M. M. Aziev, E. Grishina, T. M. Ziganshin","doi":"10.24060/2076-3093-2023-13-2-159-164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"   Today, the incidence of iatrogenic bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy averages 0.4 % worldwide. In Russia, it accounted for 0.6 % in 2020. Side-to-side hepaticojejunostomy is the operation of choice with complete injury of the common bile duct. It is considered the safest operation, which preserves blood supply, provides wider anastomosis, ensures complete rehabilitation in 75–98 % of cases. Even in the centers of hepatobiliary surgery, the development of strictures after hepaticojejunostomy with traditional access after iatrogenic injury to the bile ducts occurs in 10–20 % of cases. Bile leakage develops in 3.0–3.3 % of cases. The success of reconstructive surgery largely depends on the precision technique of performing anastomosis, which can be ensured mainly by the quality of imaging. The possibility of laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy after a common bile duct injury is currently a subject of debate, and only few publications report on its successful performance. Most surgeons prefer open anastomosis due to insufficient space for laparoscopic instruments. Although the advantages of laparoscopic surgery over traditional interventions are essential for this category of patients no less than for the others. Robotic laparoscopic surgery with its additional space for instruments in the complete absence of tremor, a twenty-fold increase in three-dimensional image, which increases the accuracy of tissue dissection and the precision of anastomotic sutures, can be an excellent option for working on thin tubular structures in the porta hepatis.","PeriodicalId":52846,"journal":{"name":"Kreativnaia khirurgiia i onkologiia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kreativnaia khirurgiia i onkologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2023-13-2-159-164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

   Today, the incidence of iatrogenic bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy averages 0.4 % worldwide. In Russia, it accounted for 0.6 % in 2020. Side-to-side hepaticojejunostomy is the operation of choice with complete injury of the common bile duct. It is considered the safest operation, which preserves blood supply, provides wider anastomosis, ensures complete rehabilitation in 75–98 % of cases. Even in the centers of hepatobiliary surgery, the development of strictures after hepaticojejunostomy with traditional access after iatrogenic injury to the bile ducts occurs in 10–20 % of cases. Bile leakage develops in 3.0–3.3 % of cases. The success of reconstructive surgery largely depends on the precision technique of performing anastomosis, which can be ensured mainly by the quality of imaging. The possibility of laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy after a common bile duct injury is currently a subject of debate, and only few publications report on its successful performance. Most surgeons prefer open anastomosis due to insufficient space for laparoscopic instruments. Although the advantages of laparoscopic surgery over traditional interventions are essential for this category of patients no less than for the others. Robotic laparoscopic surgery with its additional space for instruments in the complete absence of tremor, a twenty-fold increase in three-dimensional image, which increases the accuracy of tissue dissection and the precision of anastomotic sutures, can be an excellent option for working on thin tubular structures in the porta hepatis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜胆囊切除术失败后胆管重建:文献回顾
目前,全世界腹腔镜胆囊切除术中医源性胆管损伤的发生率平均为0.4%。在俄罗斯,到2020年这一比例为0.6%。肝空肠侧对侧吻合术是胆总管完全损伤的首选手术。它被认为是最安全的手术,它能保持血液供应,提供更宽的吻合口,确保75 - 98%的病例完全康复。即使在肝胆外科中心,10 - 20%的病例在医源性胆管损伤后采用传统通路肝空肠吻合术后发生狭窄。3.0 - 3.3%的病例发生胆漏。重建手术的成功与否在很大程度上取决于吻合技术的精确性,而吻合技术的准确性主要由影像质量来保证。胆总管损伤后腹腔镜肝空肠吻合术的可能性目前是一个有争议的话题,只有少数出版物报道其成功的表现。由于腹腔镜手术器械的空间不足,大多数外科医生倾向于开放式吻合。尽管腹腔镜手术优于传统干预的优势对这类患者至关重要,但对其他患者同样重要。机器人腹腔镜手术在完全没有震颤的情况下为器械提供了额外的空间,三维图像增加了20倍,这提高了组织解剖的准确性和吻合缝合线的精度,可以成为肝门细管结构手术的绝佳选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Predictors of Liver Cancer: a Review Clinical Cases of Successful Endoscopic Bronchial Stenting Surgical Treatment for Branched Endograft Thrombosis of the Abdominal Aorta Features of the Course of Radioinduced Breast Cancer. Clinical Observation Predictors of Multiple Primary Malignancies: Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1