{"title":"I (Won’t) See You in Court Alternative Dispute Resolution for Medical Liability Conflicts: Examples from Europe","authors":"Vera Lúcia Raposo","doi":"10.54648/erpl2020076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many jurisdictions, courts and the related tort liability rules have failed to adequately address conflicts arising from healthcare delivery that has caused harm. The litigation model – the classic model used to deal with medical liability – must be, if not replaced, at least supplemented by another model, and alternative dispute resolution is best suited to this task. Because conflicts are resolved in a less adversarial environment than a courtroom and led by people with knowledge of both medicine and law, alternative dispute resolution promotes a congenial procedure, is faster and cheaper than traditional litigation and can provide more satisfactory outcomes for all parties. This paper reviews some of the failures of litigation as a means of resolving disputes related to medical liability and considers how alternative dispute resolution methods can address these failures, providing some examples from civil law jurisdictions in Europe.\nalternative dispute resolution, doctor-patient relationship, litigation, medical liability Motsclés: résolution alternative des conflits, relation médecin-patient, contentieux, responsabilité médicale Schlüsselwörter: alternative Streitbeilegung, Arzt-Patient-Beziehung, Gerichtsverfahren, Arzthaftung","PeriodicalId":43736,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Private Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2020076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In many jurisdictions, courts and the related tort liability rules have failed to adequately address conflicts arising from healthcare delivery that has caused harm. The litigation model – the classic model used to deal with medical liability – must be, if not replaced, at least supplemented by another model, and alternative dispute resolution is best suited to this task. Because conflicts are resolved in a less adversarial environment than a courtroom and led by people with knowledge of both medicine and law, alternative dispute resolution promotes a congenial procedure, is faster and cheaper than traditional litigation and can provide more satisfactory outcomes for all parties. This paper reviews some of the failures of litigation as a means of resolving disputes related to medical liability and considers how alternative dispute resolution methods can address these failures, providing some examples from civil law jurisdictions in Europe.
alternative dispute resolution, doctor-patient relationship, litigation, medical liability Motsclés: résolution alternative des conflits, relation médecin-patient, contentieux, responsabilité médicale Schlüsselwörter: alternative Streitbeilegung, Arzt-Patient-Beziehung, Gerichtsverfahren, Arzthaftung
在许多司法管辖区,法院和相关的侵权责任规则未能充分解决因医疗服务提供而产生的造成伤害的冲突。诉讼模式——用于处理医疗责任的经典模式——如果不能被取代,至少必须被另一种模式所补充,而替代性纠纷解决最适合这项任务。由于冲突是在一个比法庭更不具对抗性的环境中解决的,并且由精通医学和法律的人领导,因此替代性纠纷解决可以促进一种和谐的程序,比传统诉讼更快、更便宜,并且可以为各方提供更令人满意的结果。本文回顾了诉讼作为解决医疗责任纠纷手段的一些失败,并考虑了替代性纠纷解决方法如何解决这些失败,提供了欧洲民法管辖区的一些例子,医疗责任Motsclés:résolution alternative des conflicits,relation médecin patient,contentieux,responsabilitémémedical Schlüsselwörter:alternative Streitbeilegung,Arzt patient Beziehung,Gerichtsverfahren,Arzthaftung