Cognitively challenging talk during shared reading: Effects of parent gender, child gender and relations with story comprehension

IF 1.3 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Early Childhood Literacy Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI:10.1177/14687984221082240
R. van Steensel, Brenda Gouw, Saskia Liefers, Tessa van Aspert
{"title":"Cognitively challenging talk during shared reading: Effects of parent gender, child gender and relations with story comprehension","authors":"R. van Steensel, Brenda Gouw, Saskia Liefers, Tessa van Aspert","doi":"10.1177/14687984221082240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although research on the home literacy environment and its impact on early literacy has long focused on mothers, the past decade has seen a shift in scholarly attention to the role of fathers. Building on this shift, we examined whether the nature of parent–child interactions during shared storybook reading varies with parent gender, child gender and the interaction between the two, and we analysed whether possible differences in the nature of mother– and father–child interactions are related to story comprehension. We made video observations of mothers and fathers within 36 relatively highly educated families reading a storybook with their kindergartener (age 4 – 5) and registered the use of cognitively challenging (i.e. decontextualized) talk during these activities. After each shared reading session, we additionally administered a test assessing children’s understanding of the story being read. Two-way mixed ANOVA’s revealed no effects of parent gender or child gender on either the use of cognitively challenging talk or children’s story comprehension, nor did we find interaction effects of parent and child gender. The extent of cognitively challenging talk was significantly correlated to children’s comprehension scores for fathers, but not for mothers. This correlation seems to have masked another association, however: when correlations were computed separately for girls and boys, we found that the proportion of cognitively challenging utterances of both parents was correlated to comprehension scores for boys, but not for girls. The absence of parent gender effects provides further insights into the way mothers and fathers shape interactions during shared reading, but also stresses the need for studies with larger, more diverse samples. The observation that more frequent use of cognitively challenging talk was paralleled by better story comprehension for boys invites further research on the specific effects of shared reading for boys.","PeriodicalId":47033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Childhood Literacy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984221082240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Although research on the home literacy environment and its impact on early literacy has long focused on mothers, the past decade has seen a shift in scholarly attention to the role of fathers. Building on this shift, we examined whether the nature of parent–child interactions during shared storybook reading varies with parent gender, child gender and the interaction between the two, and we analysed whether possible differences in the nature of mother– and father–child interactions are related to story comprehension. We made video observations of mothers and fathers within 36 relatively highly educated families reading a storybook with their kindergartener (age 4 – 5) and registered the use of cognitively challenging (i.e. decontextualized) talk during these activities. After each shared reading session, we additionally administered a test assessing children’s understanding of the story being read. Two-way mixed ANOVA’s revealed no effects of parent gender or child gender on either the use of cognitively challenging talk or children’s story comprehension, nor did we find interaction effects of parent and child gender. The extent of cognitively challenging talk was significantly correlated to children’s comprehension scores for fathers, but not for mothers. This correlation seems to have masked another association, however: when correlations were computed separately for girls and boys, we found that the proportion of cognitively challenging utterances of both parents was correlated to comprehension scores for boys, but not for girls. The absence of parent gender effects provides further insights into the way mothers and fathers shape interactions during shared reading, but also stresses the need for studies with larger, more diverse samples. The observation that more frequent use of cognitively challenging talk was paralleled by better story comprehension for boys invites further research on the specific effects of shared reading for boys.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同阅读中的认知挑战谈话:父母性别、儿童性别的影响及其与故事理解的关系
虽然关于家庭识字环境及其对早期识字的影响的研究长期以来一直集中在母亲身上,但过去十年来,学术界的注意力转向了父亲的角色。在这一转变的基础上,我们研究了亲子互动的性质是否会随着父母性别、孩子性别以及两者之间的互动而变化,并分析了母子互动性质的差异是否与故事理解有关。我们对36个教育程度相对较高的家庭的父母和他们的幼儿园孩子(4 - 5岁)一起阅读故事书进行了视频观察,并记录了在这些活动中使用认知挑战(即非情境化)谈话的情况。在每个共享阅读环节之后,我们还进行了一项测试,评估孩子们对所读故事的理解程度。双向混合方差分析显示,父母性别和儿童性别对认知挑战性谈话的使用和儿童的故事理解都没有影响,我们也没有发现父母和儿童性别的交互作用。对父亲来说,具有认知挑战性的谈话的程度与孩子的理解分数显著相关,而对母亲来说则不然。然而,这种相关性似乎掩盖了另一种关联:当分别计算女孩和男孩的相关性时,我们发现父母双方的认知挑战话语比例与男孩的理解分数相关,而与女孩无关。父母性别影响的缺失为父母在共同阅读过程中影响互动的方式提供了进一步的见解,但也强调了对更大、更多样化样本的研究的必要性。观察到男孩更频繁地使用具有认知挑战性的谈话与更好的故事理解是平行的,这就需要进一步研究共同阅读对男孩的具体影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy
Journal of Early Childhood Literacy EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: Journal of Early Childhood Literacy is a fully peer-reviewed international journal. Since its foundation in 2001 JECL has rapidly become a distinctive, leading voice in research in early childhood literacy, with a multinational range of contributors and readership. The main emphasis in the journal is on papers researching issues related to the nature, function and use of literacy in early childhood. This includes the history, development, use, learning and teaching of literacy, as well as policy and strategy. Research papers may address theoretical, methodological, strategic or applied aspects of early childhood literacy and could be reviews of research issues. JECL is both a forum for debate about the topic of early childhood literacy and a resource for those working in the field. Literacy is broadly defined; JECL focuses on the 0-8 age range. Our prime interest in empirical work is those studies that are situated in authentic or naturalistic settings; this differentiates the journal from others in the area. JECL, therefore, tends to favour qualitative work but is also open to research employing quantitative methods. The journal is multi-disciplinary. We welcome submissions from diverse disciplinary backgrounds including: education, cultural psychology, literacy studies, sociology, anthropology, historical and cultural studies, applied linguistics and semiotics.
期刊最新文献
Windows & mirrors but mostly windows: Early childhood administrators view on diverse books Book review: Toward a BlackBoyCrit pedagogy black boys: Male teachers, and early childhood classroom practices Writing experiences in early childhood classrooms where children made higher language gains Emergent bilingual preschoolers’ verbal and embodied engagement behaviors in read aloud Exploring teacher candidates’ discursive shifts in translanguaging pedagogies during literacy instruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1