Laparoscopic esophagogastric devascularization for portal hypertension

Yafeng Chen, Xilin Du, Jianguo Lu, Jikai Yin, Dong Wang, L. Zang, R. Dong
{"title":"Laparoscopic esophagogastric devascularization for portal hypertension","authors":"Yafeng Chen, Xilin Du, Jianguo Lu, Jikai Yin, Dong Wang, L. Zang, R. Dong","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization in patients with portal hypertension. \n \n \nMethods \nIn this study, 205 patients who underwent splenectomy and pericardial devascularization in the Second Hospital of Air Force Medical University between Jan 2013 and Jan 2018 were divided into 135 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery(LSD group) and 70 patients undergoing open surgery(OSD group). \n \n \nResults \nOperation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood infusion, time of postoperative abdominal drainage-tube removal, time of gastrointestinal function recovery and duration of hospital stay were respectively (150±37)min, (223±129)ml, (91±138)ml, (4.0±1.0)d, (33±9)h, (5.6±1.0)d in the LSD group, (183±42)min, (346±131)ml, (214±182)ml, (5.5±1.3)d, (42±14)h, (7.5±1.4)d in the OSD group, with statistically significant differences between groups(t=-2.203, -4.980, -2.830, -5.553, -2.307, -6.635, all P<0.05). The main complications included pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal bleeding, intra-abdominal infection, pulmonary infection, refractory ascites, portal vein system thrombosis and incision infection, and there were respectively 0, 1, 2, 2, 3, 13, 0 in the LSD group and 3, 4, 6, 6, 7, 14, 3 in the OSD group, with statistically significant differences between groups (χ2=5.872, 4.792, 6.179, 6.179, 6.010, 4.335, 5.872, all P<0.05). All the 205 patients received follow-up for a median time of 38 months(12-72 months). Gastroscopy showed improvement of esophageal and gastric varices in postoperative 6 months. \n \n \nConclusion \nLaparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for the treatment of portal hypertension is safe, feasible and effective. \n \n \nKey words: \nHypertension, portal; Laparoscopy; Splenectomy","PeriodicalId":66425,"journal":{"name":"中华普通外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华普通外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1007-631X.2019.12.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization in patients with portal hypertension. Methods In this study, 205 patients who underwent splenectomy and pericardial devascularization in the Second Hospital of Air Force Medical University between Jan 2013 and Jan 2018 were divided into 135 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery(LSD group) and 70 patients undergoing open surgery(OSD group). Results Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood infusion, time of postoperative abdominal drainage-tube removal, time of gastrointestinal function recovery and duration of hospital stay were respectively (150±37)min, (223±129)ml, (91±138)ml, (4.0±1.0)d, (33±9)h, (5.6±1.0)d in the LSD group, (183±42)min, (346±131)ml, (214±182)ml, (5.5±1.3)d, (42±14)h, (7.5±1.4)d in the OSD group, with statistically significant differences between groups(t=-2.203, -4.980, -2.830, -5.553, -2.307, -6.635, all P<0.05). The main complications included pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal bleeding, intra-abdominal infection, pulmonary infection, refractory ascites, portal vein system thrombosis and incision infection, and there were respectively 0, 1, 2, 2, 3, 13, 0 in the LSD group and 3, 4, 6, 6, 7, 14, 3 in the OSD group, with statistically significant differences between groups (χ2=5.872, 4.792, 6.179, 6.179, 6.010, 4.335, 5.872, all P<0.05). All the 205 patients received follow-up for a median time of 38 months(12-72 months). Gastroscopy showed improvement of esophageal and gastric varices in postoperative 6 months. Conclusion Laparoscopic splenectomy and pericardial devascularization for the treatment of portal hypertension is safe, feasible and effective. Key words: Hypertension, portal; Laparoscopy; Splenectomy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔镜食管胃断流术治疗门静脉高压症
目的评价腹腔镜下门静脉高压症脾切除术及心包断流术的疗效。方法本研究将2013年1月至2018年1月在空军医科大学第二医院接受脾切除和心包断流术的205例患者分为135例腹腔镜手术患者(LSD组)和70例开放手术患者(OSD组)。结果LSD组手术时间为(150±37)min,术中出血量为(223±129)ml,胃肠功能恢复时间为(91±138)ml,住院时间为(4.0±1.0)d,(33±9)h,(5.6±1.0)h,LSD组为(183±42)min,(346±131)ml,(214±182)ml,OSD组为(7.5±1.4)d,组间差异有统计学意义(t=-2.203、-4.980、-2.830、-5.53、-2.307、-6.635,均P<0.05)。主要并发症包括胰瘘、腹腔出血、腹腔感染、肺部感染、顽固性腹水、门静脉系统血栓形成和切口感染,LSD组为0,OSD组为3、4、6、6、7、14、3,组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.872、4.792、6.179、6.179,6.010、4.335、5.872,均P<0.05)。胃镜检查显示术后6个月食管和胃静脉曲张有所改善。结论腹腔镜脾切除加心包断流术治疗门静脉高压症安全、可行、有效。关键词:高血压,门脉;腹腔镜;脾切除术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9825
期刊最新文献
Prognostic value of preoperative serum ferritin in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Risk factors of neurologic complications after surgical resection of carotid body tumor Long-term follow up outcomes of surgical resection of Shamblin II/III carotid body tumor: a single center analysis Outcomes of surgical treatment for carotid body tumor without preoperative embolization: a single-center retrospective study Risk factors of restenosis of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of Takayasu arteritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1