The application of multi-mode anesthesia monitoring and management in the operation of elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumor and fragile brain function

Xiuxia Wu
{"title":"The application of multi-mode anesthesia monitoring and management in the operation of elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumor and fragile brain function","authors":"Xiuxia Wu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4378.2019.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo observe the effect of multimode anesthesia monitoring and management in the operation of elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumor and fragile brain function. \n \n \nMethods \nOne hundred and nine cases of patients with fragile brain function who underwent elective total intravenous anesthesia for gastrointestinal tumor surgery were divided into observation group (58 cases) and control group (51 cases). The control group received routine anesthesia monitoring management during operation, while the observation group received multi-mode anesthesia monitoring management during operation, including cardiac inde (CI), stroke volume variation(SVV), bispectral index(BIS), train-of-four stimulation(TOF) and regional cerebral oxygen saturation(rScO2). The following indexes were observed and compared between the two groups: ① Intraoperative dosage of related anesthetics. ② Ramsay sedation score and Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) score at 10 min and 1 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h after operation. ③ Heart rate(HR) and mean artery pressure (MAP) at admission (T0), infusion load of dexmedetomidine (T1), 1 min after intubation (T2), after skin incision (T3), after operation(T4), 1 min after extubation(T5). ④ Postoperative recovery, the relevant indicators are the opening time from the end of operation to the call, the time from the end of operation to extubation, the time of postanesthesia care unit(PACU) residence, the time of gastrointestinal function recovery and hospitalization. ⑤ Postoperative delirium (POD) and the occurrence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction(POCD). \n \n \nResults \nThe dosage used of propofol and cisatracurium besylate in the observation group were significantly less than the dosage used in control group(P<0.05). The postoperative Ramsay sedation scores of observation group at 1, 6, 24, 72 h were significantly higher than the score of the control group(P<0.05), the postoperative VAS at 10 min, 1 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h were significantly lower than the control group(P<0.05). The HR at T1-T5 time and MAP at T2-T5 time of observation group were significantly lower than the HR and MAP of control group(P<0.05). Postoperative observation group and called the open end of the operation time, extubation time, PACU dwell time and hospitalization time were significantly shorter than the values of control group (P<0.05). The total POD incidence rate in patients of the observation group in were significantly lower than the rate of the control group(P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nThe application of multi-mode anesthesia monitoring and management in the operation of elderly patients with gastrointestinal cancer and fragile brain function is satisfactory. \n \n \nKey words: \nMultimode anesthesia monitoring and management; Fragile brain function; Gastrointestinal tumor; Aged","PeriodicalId":13847,"journal":{"name":"国际麻醉学与复苏杂志","volume":"40 1","pages":"1099-1104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"国际麻醉学与复苏杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4378.2019.12.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To observe the effect of multimode anesthesia monitoring and management in the operation of elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumor and fragile brain function. Methods One hundred and nine cases of patients with fragile brain function who underwent elective total intravenous anesthesia for gastrointestinal tumor surgery were divided into observation group (58 cases) and control group (51 cases). The control group received routine anesthesia monitoring management during operation, while the observation group received multi-mode anesthesia monitoring management during operation, including cardiac inde (CI), stroke volume variation(SVV), bispectral index(BIS), train-of-four stimulation(TOF) and regional cerebral oxygen saturation(rScO2). The following indexes were observed and compared between the two groups: ① Intraoperative dosage of related anesthetics. ② Ramsay sedation score and Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) score at 10 min and 1 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h after operation. ③ Heart rate(HR) and mean artery pressure (MAP) at admission (T0), infusion load of dexmedetomidine (T1), 1 min after intubation (T2), after skin incision (T3), after operation(T4), 1 min after extubation(T5). ④ Postoperative recovery, the relevant indicators are the opening time from the end of operation to the call, the time from the end of operation to extubation, the time of postanesthesia care unit(PACU) residence, the time of gastrointestinal function recovery and hospitalization. ⑤ Postoperative delirium (POD) and the occurrence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction(POCD). Results The dosage used of propofol and cisatracurium besylate in the observation group were significantly less than the dosage used in control group(P<0.05). The postoperative Ramsay sedation scores of observation group at 1, 6, 24, 72 h were significantly higher than the score of the control group(P<0.05), the postoperative VAS at 10 min, 1 h, 6 h, 24 h, 48 h were significantly lower than the control group(P<0.05). The HR at T1-T5 time and MAP at T2-T5 time of observation group were significantly lower than the HR and MAP of control group(P<0.05). Postoperative observation group and called the open end of the operation time, extubation time, PACU dwell time and hospitalization time were significantly shorter than the values of control group (P<0.05). The total POD incidence rate in patients of the observation group in were significantly lower than the rate of the control group(P<0.05). Conclusions The application of multi-mode anesthesia monitoring and management in the operation of elderly patients with gastrointestinal cancer and fragile brain function is satisfactory. Key words: Multimode anesthesia monitoring and management; Fragile brain function; Gastrointestinal tumor; Aged
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多模式麻醉监测与管理在老年胃肠道肿瘤及脑功能脆弱患者手术中的应用
目的观察多模式麻醉监测与管理在老年胃肠道肿瘤及脑功能脆弱患者手术中的效果。方法将109例脑功能脆弱的胃肠道肿瘤手术患者随机分为观察组(58例)和对照组(51例)。对照组在手术过程中接受常规麻醉监测管理,观察组在手术期间接受多模式麻醉监测管理。包括心脏inde(CI)、搏出量变化(SVV)、双频谱指数(BIS)、TOF和区域脑血氧饱和度(rScO2)。观察并比较两组患者术中相关麻醉剂的用量术后10分钟及1小时、6小时、24小时、48小时、72小时的Ramsay镇静评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。③入院时的心率(HR)和平均动脉压(MAP)(T0),右美托咪定输注量(T1),插管后1分钟(T2),皮肤切开后(T3),手术后(T4),拔管后1分钟术后恢复,相关指标为手术结束至呼叫的开放时间、手术结束至拔管的时间、麻醉后监护室(PACU)驻留时间、胃肠功能恢复及住院时间。⑤术后谵妄(POD)和术后认知功能障碍(POCD)的发生。结果观察组丙泊酚和苯磺酸顺阿曲库铵的用量明显少于对照组(P<0.05),观察组术后1、6、24、72 h Ramsay镇静评分明显高于对照组(P<0.01),观察组T1-T5时HR和T2-T5时MAP均显著低于对照组(P<0.05),PACU停留时间和住院时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05),观察组年POD总发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)并且脆弱的大脑功能是令人满意的。关键词:多模式麻醉监测与管理;大脑功能脆弱;胃肠道肿瘤;老化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7758
期刊最新文献
Research progress on cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in acute respiratory distress syndrome Accuracy of invasive systolic pressure variation in monitoring the volume responsiveness of patients under pneumoperitoneum Research progress on blood-brain barrier damage in the pathogenesis of postoperative delirium Comparison of the application of cuffed or uncuffed endotracheal tubes in full-term newborns undergoing congenital intestinal atresia surgery Research progress on the clinical application of apneic oxygenation technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1