Tree Composition and Size Structure Based on Nativity and Deer Resistance at an Urban Forest in Southeast Pennsylvania

IF 0.2 4区 生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES Rhodora Pub Date : 2022-04-12 DOI:10.3119/20-11
Gregory D. Turner, Kelly Ryan, William A Ricci, Kendra McMillin, G. Hertel
{"title":"Tree Composition and Size Structure Based on Nativity and Deer Resistance at an Urban Forest in Southeast Pennsylvania","authors":"Gregory D. Turner, Kelly Ryan, William A Ricci, Kendra McMillin, G. Hertel","doi":"10.3119/20-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT. Urban forests of northeastern North America are often seen as degraded ecosystems with little ecological diversity or value. This is especially true given that native tree species declines in these forests have resulted from low recruitment caused by abundant exotic species, mortality from pathogens and pests, and severe deer browse. This study assessed tree composition and size structure of species found at the Robert B. Gordon Natural Area for Environmental Studies, an urban 51 ha forest fragment located 36 km west of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The study quantified and compared tree species from 15 plots located in mid- to late-successional forest stands. Species were categorized as native or exotic and resistant or nonresistant to deer browse. We quantified tree densities per species and measured diameter at breast height of all individuals > 2.5 cm and used this information to quantify relative importance values and assign trees to size classes. Natives Liriodendron tulipifera and Fagus grandifolia, and exotic Acer platanoides, dominated composition (i.e., 45.3% of total relative importance), with L. tulipifera most dominant. Natives had significantly greater densities than exotics in all size classes that included both categories, except for a 10–20 cm class, regardless of whether F. grandifolia, a prolific root sprouter, was included or excluded from comparisons. When F. grandifolia was excluded, nonresistant species had significantly greater densities than resistant ones in classes ranging from the smallest to larger classes. The prominence of nonresistant species in the smallest classes was unexpected given intense deer browsing.","PeriodicalId":54454,"journal":{"name":"Rhodora","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhodora","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3119/20-11","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Urban forests of northeastern North America are often seen as degraded ecosystems with little ecological diversity or value. This is especially true given that native tree species declines in these forests have resulted from low recruitment caused by abundant exotic species, mortality from pathogens and pests, and severe deer browse. This study assessed tree composition and size structure of species found at the Robert B. Gordon Natural Area for Environmental Studies, an urban 51 ha forest fragment located 36 km west of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The study quantified and compared tree species from 15 plots located in mid- to late-successional forest stands. Species were categorized as native or exotic and resistant or nonresistant to deer browse. We quantified tree densities per species and measured diameter at breast height of all individuals > 2.5 cm and used this information to quantify relative importance values and assign trees to size classes. Natives Liriodendron tulipifera and Fagus grandifolia, and exotic Acer platanoides, dominated composition (i.e., 45.3% of total relative importance), with L. tulipifera most dominant. Natives had significantly greater densities than exotics in all size classes that included both categories, except for a 10–20 cm class, regardless of whether F. grandifolia, a prolific root sprouter, was included or excluded from comparisons. When F. grandifolia was excluded, nonresistant species had significantly greater densities than resistant ones in classes ranging from the smallest to larger classes. The prominence of nonresistant species in the smallest classes was unexpected given intense deer browsing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宾夕法尼亚州东南部一座城市森林的树木组成和大小结构——基于原生性和抗鹿性
摘要北美东北部的城市森林通常被视为退化的生态系统,几乎没有生态多样性或价值。考虑到这些森林中本地树种的减少是由于大量外来物种导致的补充不足、病原体和害虫的死亡以及鹿的严重啃食造成的,这一点尤其正确。这项研究评估了Robert B. Gordon自然环境研究区发现的树木组成和物种大小结构,这是一个位于宾夕法尼亚州费城以西36公里的51公顷的城市森林碎片。本研究对位于中后期演替林分的15个样地的树种进行了量化比较。物种分为本地和外来以及对鹿食有抗性和无抗性。我们量化了每个树种的树密度,并测量了所有个体在胸高为2.5 cm时的直径,并利用这些信息量化了相对重要性值,并将树木划分为大小类别。本土鹅毛楸、大叶Fagus和外来平叶槭(Acer platanoides)以鹅毛楸(L. tulipifera)为优势,相对重要性占45.3%。除了10-20 cm级外,在包括这两个类别的所有大小类别中,土生植物的密度都显著高于外来植物,无论是否包括或不包括多产的根发芽植物桔梗(F. grandfolia)。在排除桔梗的情况下,从最小纲到较大纲,非抗性种的密度均显著高于抗性种。考虑到鹿的强烈食食,非抗性物种在最小类中的突出是出乎意料的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rhodora
Rhodora 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal is devoted primarily to the botany of North America and accepts scientific papers and notes relating to the systematics, floristics, ecology, paleobotany, or conservation biology of this or floristically related regions.
期刊最新文献
Imperforate St. John's-Wort (Hypericum maculatum subsp. obtusiusculum): A New Overlooked Nonnative Forb for Eastern North America Graduate Student Research Award Statement of Owernership, Management and Circulation Ecological Guide to the Mosses & Common Liverworts of the Northeast Patterns and changes in the Nonnative Flora of Franklin County, Massachusetts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1