COVID-19 impact on agriculture and food security in Africa. A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.2 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES World Development Perspectives Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wdp.2023.100523
Roland Azibo Balgah , Emmanuel Olatunbosun Benjamin , Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi , Gertrud Buchenrieder
{"title":"COVID-19 impact on agriculture and food security in Africa. A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Roland Azibo Balgah ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Olatunbosun Benjamin ,&nbsp;Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi ,&nbsp;Gertrud Buchenrieder","doi":"10.1016/j.wdp.2023.100523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>While agriculture is the life-wire for many African economies, the sector has been exposed to multiple shocks, leading to food insecurity concerns. COVID-19′s seemingly perennial nature suggests the need for African agrarian systems to explore pathways to achieve food security in the midst of pandemics. However, existing knowledge on the effects of COVID-19 agriculture and food security remains fragmented. This article reviews preliminary documented and projected effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on agriculture and food security in Africa, combining an inter-rater reliability (IRR) – based systematic review with <em>meta</em>-analysis on 74 rigorously selected published items, including 157 case studies. Our analysis hitches on the sustainable livelihoods framework and a novel systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis protocol (Tadesse, 2020). An IRR score of 0.93 suggests overwhelming convergence of contemporary COVID-19 scholarship on the negative economic effects of COVID-19 on agricultural supply and demand across Africa, which, in combination with other factors, culminates in increasing, multi-dimensional food insecurity, hitting hard on the poor and vulnerable. The <em>meta</em>-analysis suggests that agriculture is more exposed to COVID-19 effects than other (non-agricultural) sectors, with an overall pooled association effect size (RR) for the COVID-19 pandemic and farming occupation of 1.25 (95% CI, 0.72–0.96;<!--> <!-->P = 0.01), and significant heterogeneity between studies (Ι<sup>2</sup> = 100%,<!--> <!-->P &lt; 0.00). Future reviews and meta analyses increasingly focusing on methodological details are recommended, to provide insights on COVID-19 effects on African agriculture and food security. Policy implications of prolonged COVID-19 effects on agriculture and food security in Africa are then contemplated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37831,"journal":{"name":"World Development Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292923000395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

While agriculture is the life-wire for many African economies, the sector has been exposed to multiple shocks, leading to food insecurity concerns. COVID-19′s seemingly perennial nature suggests the need for African agrarian systems to explore pathways to achieve food security in the midst of pandemics. However, existing knowledge on the effects of COVID-19 agriculture and food security remains fragmented. This article reviews preliminary documented and projected effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on agriculture and food security in Africa, combining an inter-rater reliability (IRR) – based systematic review with meta-analysis on 74 rigorously selected published items, including 157 case studies. Our analysis hitches on the sustainable livelihoods framework and a novel systematic review and meta-analysis protocol (Tadesse, 2020). An IRR score of 0.93 suggests overwhelming convergence of contemporary COVID-19 scholarship on the negative economic effects of COVID-19 on agricultural supply and demand across Africa, which, in combination with other factors, culminates in increasing, multi-dimensional food insecurity, hitting hard on the poor and vulnerable. The meta-analysis suggests that agriculture is more exposed to COVID-19 effects than other (non-agricultural) sectors, with an overall pooled association effect size (RR) for the COVID-19 pandemic and farming occupation of 1.25 (95% CI, 0.72–0.96; P = 0.01), and significant heterogeneity between studies (Ι2 = 100%, P < 0.00). Future reviews and meta analyses increasingly focusing on methodological details are recommended, to provide insights on COVID-19 effects on African agriculture and food security. Policy implications of prolonged COVID-19 effects on agriculture and food security in Africa are then contemplated.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎对非洲农业和粮食安全的影响。系统综述和荟萃分析
虽然农业是许多非洲经济体的生命线,但该部门受到多重冲击,导致粮食不安全问题。COVID-19似乎具有长期性,这表明非洲农业系统需要探索在大流行期间实现粮食安全的途径。然而,关于2019冠状病毒病农业和粮食安全影响的现有知识仍然零散。本文回顾了初步记录和预测的2019冠状病毒病大流行对非洲农业和粮食安全的影响,结合了基于评级间可靠性(IRR)的系统评价和对74项严格选择的已发表项目(包括157项案例研究)的荟萃分析。我们的分析依赖于可持续生计框架和一种新的系统回顾和荟萃分析方案(Tadesse, 2020)。IRR得分为0.93,表明当代关于2019冠状病毒病对整个非洲农业供需的负面经济影响的研究出现了压倒性的趋同,这种影响与其他因素相结合,最终加剧了多维度的粮食不安全,严重打击了贫困和弱势群体。荟萃分析表明,与其他(非农业)部门相比,农业更容易受到COVID-19效应的影响,COVID-19大流行与农业职业的总体汇总关联效应大小(RR)为1.25 (95% CI, 0.72-0.96;P = 0.01),且研究间存在显著异质性(Ι2 = 100%, P <0.00)。建议在未来进行审查和荟萃分析,越来越多地关注方法细节,以深入了解COVID-19对非洲农业和粮食安全的影响。然后考虑2019冠状病毒病对非洲农业和粮食安全的长期影响对政策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Development Perspectives
World Development Perspectives Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: World Development Perspectives is a multi-disciplinary journal of international development. It seeks to explore ways of improving human well-being by examining the performance and impact of interventions designed to address issues related to: poverty alleviation, public health and malnutrition, agricultural production, natural resource governance, globalization and transnational processes, technological progress, gender and social discrimination, and participation in economic and political life. Above all, we are particularly interested in the role of historical, legal, social, economic, political, biophysical, and/or ecological contexts in shaping development processes and outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Is seed aid distribution still justified in South Sudan? Crowding-out effect of tobacco consumption on household food expenditures in Cameroon Analysis of the ‘Good’ performance indicators of Non-Governmental Development Organizations Voluntary sustainability standards and technical efficiency of Honduran smallholder coffee producers Colonial status and income inequality in developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1