Phosphorus extraction by selected methods in alkaline and calcareous soils after mono-ammonium phosphate application at different rates

AE Venter, C. du Preez
{"title":"Phosphorus extraction by selected methods in alkaline and calcareous soils after mono-ammonium phosphate application at different rates","authors":"AE Venter, C. du Preez","doi":"10.1080/02571862.2020.1845828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Little research has been done on extractable phosphorus (P) in alkaline and calcareous irrigated soils of South Africa. This study aimed to quantify extractable P by selected methods in these soils after application of mono-ammonium phosphate (MAP) at different rates. Six soils with a pH of 7.1 to 8.2 that contained 0.6–12.4% CaCO3 were incubated for two months after application of MAP at levels equivalent to 0, 16.8, 33.6, 50.4, 67.2, 84.0 or 100.8 kg P ha−1. After incubation, soil P was extracted with the Olsen, Bray 1, Mehlich 3 and Ambic 1 methods. The most soil P was extracted with the Mehlich 3 method, and the least soil P was extracted with either the Bray 1 or Olsen methods, regardless of the MAP application rate. The differences in P extracted by the methods were attributed to the chemical composition of the extractants and the soil properties. Olsen and to a lesser extent Ambic 1 were the most reliable methods for establishing the amount of P required to raise the P status of the alkaline and calcareous soils. Future research should focus on establishing specific threshold values for soil and crop combinations with the Olsen method.","PeriodicalId":21920,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","volume":"38 1","pages":"60 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02571862.2020.1845828","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2020.1845828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Little research has been done on extractable phosphorus (P) in alkaline and calcareous irrigated soils of South Africa. This study aimed to quantify extractable P by selected methods in these soils after application of mono-ammonium phosphate (MAP) at different rates. Six soils with a pH of 7.1 to 8.2 that contained 0.6–12.4% CaCO3 were incubated for two months after application of MAP at levels equivalent to 0, 16.8, 33.6, 50.4, 67.2, 84.0 or 100.8 kg P ha−1. After incubation, soil P was extracted with the Olsen, Bray 1, Mehlich 3 and Ambic 1 methods. The most soil P was extracted with the Mehlich 3 method, and the least soil P was extracted with either the Bray 1 or Olsen methods, regardless of the MAP application rate. The differences in P extracted by the methods were attributed to the chemical composition of the extractants and the soil properties. Olsen and to a lesser extent Ambic 1 were the most reliable methods for establishing the amount of P required to raise the P status of the alkaline and calcareous soils. Future research should focus on establishing specific threshold values for soil and crop combinations with the Olsen method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同配比施用磷酸一铵后碱性和石灰性土壤中磷的选择方法
对南非碱性和钙质灌溉土壤中可提取磷的研究很少。本研究旨在以不同速率施用磷酸一铵(MAP)后,通过选定的方法定量测定这些土壤中可提取的磷。6种pH值为7.1至8.2、CaCO3含量为0.6-12.4%的土壤在施用MAP后分别以0、16.8、33.6、50.4、67.2、84.0或100.8 kg P ha - 1培养2个月。孵育后,采用Olsen、Bray 1、Mehlich 3和Ambic 1法提取土壤P。无论MAP施用量如何,Mehlich 3法提取的土壤磷最多,Bray 1法和Olsen法提取的土壤磷最少。不同方法提取磷的差异主要与提取剂的化学成分和土壤性质有关。Olsen和Ambic 1在较小程度上是确定提高碱性和钙质土壤磷状态所需磷量的最可靠方法。未来的研究应侧重于用Olsen方法建立土壤和作物组合的具体阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Plant and Soil
South African Journal of Plant and Soil Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal has a proud history of publishing quality papers in the fields of applied plant and soil sciences and has, since its inception, recorded a vast body of scientific information with particular reference to South Africa.
期刊最新文献
Digital soil mapping enables informed decision-making to conserve soils within protected areas The effect of crop rotation on soil health in the north-western Free State region, South Africa A bioassay of mine-affected soils and ameliorants in semi-arid rehabilitation Determination of optimal soil pH and nutrient concentrations for cultivated rooibos tea using the boundary line approach Rooting potential of the ‘vleitee’ honeybush ( Cyclopia subternata ) as affected by growth season and the manipulation of stock plant characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1