New Contentious Politics. Civil Society, Social Movements, and the Polarisation of German Politics

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE German Politics Pub Date : 2022-04-05 DOI:10.1080/09644008.2022.2044474
Swen Hutter, Manès Weisskircher
{"title":"New Contentious Politics. Civil Society, Social Movements, and the Polarisation of German Politics","authors":"Swen Hutter, Manès Weisskircher","doi":"10.1080/09644008.2022.2044474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this Special Issue, we show that the study of civil society, social movements, and protest is central for assessing the current state of German politics. First, moving beyond political parties and electoral politics delivers crucial insights into the ideological, affective, and organisational structuring of emerging polarisation and cleavages. Second, the transformations in electoral politics are closely interrelated with dynamics in civil society. Building on these perspectives, the contributions to the Special Issue underline that, due to the emergence of new cleavages, Germany, like other European countries, has seen a double transformation of its landscape of political contestation: ‘New contentious politics’ is on the rise, marked by new issues and claims as well as hybrid organisational forms and close interactions between protest and electoral politics. Importantly, in contrast to long-held assumptions, protest is not the exclusive terrain of ‘progressive’ forces and not shaped by increasingly differentiated arenas of mobilisation. Based on a broad range of cases and methods, the contributions take stock of social movement and civil society activism in Germany since the 2000s, i.e. in an era of multiple crises and increasing polarisation.","PeriodicalId":46640,"journal":{"name":"German Politics","volume":"32 1","pages":"403 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2044474","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this Special Issue, we show that the study of civil society, social movements, and protest is central for assessing the current state of German politics. First, moving beyond political parties and electoral politics delivers crucial insights into the ideological, affective, and organisational structuring of emerging polarisation and cleavages. Second, the transformations in electoral politics are closely interrelated with dynamics in civil society. Building on these perspectives, the contributions to the Special Issue underline that, due to the emergence of new cleavages, Germany, like other European countries, has seen a double transformation of its landscape of political contestation: ‘New contentious politics’ is on the rise, marked by new issues and claims as well as hybrid organisational forms and close interactions between protest and electoral politics. Importantly, in contrast to long-held assumptions, protest is not the exclusive terrain of ‘progressive’ forces and not shaped by increasingly differentiated arenas of mobilisation. Based on a broad range of cases and methods, the contributions take stock of social movement and civil society activism in Germany since the 2000s, i.e. in an era of multiple crises and increasing polarisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新的争议性政治。公民社会、社会运动与德国政治的两极化
在本期特刊中,我们展示了对公民社会、社会运动和抗议的研究是评估德国政治现状的核心。首先,超越政党和选举政治,对新出现的两极分化和分裂的意识形态、情感和组织结构提供了至关重要的见解。其次,选举政治的转变与公民社会的动态密切相关。在这些观点的基础上,特刊的贡献强调,由于新的分裂的出现,德国和其他欧洲国家一样,已经看到了其政治竞争格局的双重转变:“新的有争议的政治”正在兴起,其标志是新的问题和主张,以及混合的组织形式和抗议与选举政治之间的密切互动。重要的是,与长期以来的假设相反,抗议不是“进步”力量的专属领域,也不是由日益分化的动员领域塑造的。基于广泛的案例和方法,这些贡献评估了自2000年代以来德国的社会运动和公民社会活动,即在多重危机和日益两极分化的时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
German Politics
German Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Against All Odds? A Discourse Network Analysis of the Political Debate About the German Passenger Car Toll Act German Legislators’ Conceptions of Democracy and Process Preferences: Results from a New Survey Germany’s Triangular Relations with the United States and China in the Era of the Zeitenwende The Effects of Federalism, Corporatism and Legislative Power on Health System Transformation in Germany Erythrocyte fatty acid aberrations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Correlation with disease duration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1