Designing a quality scorecard (QSC) for system integration in the era of Industry 4.0

Hye Young Roh, Shujaat Ali, Hojun Song, W. Shin
{"title":"Designing a quality scorecard (QSC) for system integration in the era of Industry 4.0","authors":"Hye Young Roh, Shujaat Ali, Hojun Song, W. Shin","doi":"10.1108/ijqss-11-2020-0173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate the criteria to measure and manage a software project’s quality indicator elements needed to implement system integration in the Industry 4.0 era.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe standard software process model SPICE: a crucial part of the system integration software development process, is analyzed to explore how the factors of the SPICE model rate qualitatively on the quality scorecard (QSC). QSC is a qualitative performance measurement model based on the cost of quality (COQ) perspective. The SPICE model’s effectiveness is examined in terms of system integration (SI) quality, and factors for improving this quality are determined.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors proposed future directions for improving SI management. The seven SPICE process groups were analyzed comparatively by matching them to the QSC. The SPICE model was found to achieve 63% with the required factors in QSC. Also, the uncommitted items indicated need to be considered for additional management in SI quality.\n\n\nPractical implications\nSince SPICE is revised every five years, it is suggested from this study that diagnosing the assessment items from the COQ perspective using QSC is one strategy to quickly enhance the quality of SI management in this rapidly changing technology revolution.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis research is the first study of its kind, proposing a methodology for adapting quickly to the Fourth Industrial Revolution’s changes and showing how the standards have changed the SPICE model over time.\n","PeriodicalId":14403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqss-11-2020-0173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate the criteria to measure and manage a software project’s quality indicator elements needed to implement system integration in the Industry 4.0 era. Design/methodology/approach The standard software process model SPICE: a crucial part of the system integration software development process, is analyzed to explore how the factors of the SPICE model rate qualitatively on the quality scorecard (QSC). QSC is a qualitative performance measurement model based on the cost of quality (COQ) perspective. The SPICE model’s effectiveness is examined in terms of system integration (SI) quality, and factors for improving this quality are determined. Findings The authors proposed future directions for improving SI management. The seven SPICE process groups were analyzed comparatively by matching them to the QSC. The SPICE model was found to achieve 63% with the required factors in QSC. Also, the uncommitted items indicated need to be considered for additional management in SI quality. Practical implications Since SPICE is revised every five years, it is suggested from this study that diagnosing the assessment items from the COQ perspective using QSC is one strategy to quickly enhance the quality of SI management in this rapidly changing technology revolution. Originality/value This research is the first study of its kind, proposing a methodology for adapting quickly to the Fourth Industrial Revolution’s changes and showing how the standards have changed the SPICE model over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为工业4.0时代的系统集成设计质量记分卡
目的本研究旨在探讨在工业4.0时代实施系统集成所需的软件项目质量指标要素的衡量和管理标准。设计/方法论/方法对系统集成软件开发过程中的关键部分标准软件过程模型SPICE进行了分析,探讨了SPICE模型的影响因素如何在质量记分卡(QSC)上定性评分。QSC是一个基于质量成本(COQ)视角的定性绩效衡量模型。从系统集成(SI)质量的角度检验了SPICE模型的有效性,并确定了提高该质量的因素。发现作者提出了改进SI管理的未来方向。通过将七个SPICE工艺组与QSC进行匹配,对它们进行了比较分析。SPICE模型在QSC中达到了63%的要求因子。此外,需要考虑所示的未提交项目,以便对SI质量进行额外管理。实践意义由于SPICE每五年修订一次,因此本研究建议,在这场快速变化的技术革命中,使用QSC从COQ的角度诊断评估项目是快速提高SI管理质量的一种策略。独创性/价值这项研究是第一项此类研究,提出了一种快速适应第四次工业革命变化的方法,并展示了标准如何随着时间的推移改变SPICE模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences seeks to explore various aspects of quality and services as closely interrelated phenomena in the context of ongoing transformation processes of organizations and societies. Thus the journals'' scope is not limited to micro perspectives of organizational and management related issues. It seeks further to explore patterns, behaviors, processes, mechanisms, principles and consequences related to quality and services in a broad range of organizational and social/global processes. These processes embrace cultural, economic, social, environmental and even global dimensions in order to better understand the past, to better diagnose the current situations and hence to design better the future. The journal seeks to embrace a holistic view of quality and service sector management and explicitly promotes the emerging field of ‘quality and service sciences’.The journal is an open forum and one of the main channels for communication of multi- and inter- disciplinary research and practices.
期刊最新文献
Elevating service startup survival through strategic service quality Quality leadership, technology integration and patient care quality across countries: moderating roles of national culture and infrastructure development After-sales service and brand reputation: a case of kitchen appliance industry After-sales service and brand reputation: a case of kitchen appliance industry Brand addiction: Wow! or woe?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1