SELF REPORTED INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN INNER SPEECH (INTERNAL MONOLOGUE AND DIALOGUE) IN ADOLESCENTS WITH SOCIAL (PRAGMATIC) COMMUNICATION DISORDER (SCD)

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY Acta Neuropsychologica Pub Date : 2019-02-12 DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0013.1688
Agnieszka Siedler, T. Gałkowski, M. Pachalska
{"title":"SELF REPORTED INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN INNER SPEECH (INTERNAL MONOLOGUE AND DIALOGUE) IN ADOLESCENTS WITH SOCIAL (PRAGMATIC) COMMUNICATION DISORDER (SCD)","authors":"Agnieszka Siedler, T. Gałkowski, M. Pachalska","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.1688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to assess self-reported individual differences in the use of the inner speech of adolescents with Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder (SCD) and in particular to answer the questions: Do adolescent with SCD have inner speech and what is the direction of this speech? Is this a monologue and internal dialogue, i.e., do they speak to themselves (internal monologue) or to other people (internal dialogue)?\n\nWe tested 22 adolescents with SCD, diagnosed according to the DSM-5 criterion. The average age was 16.48 years, SD = 2.71. The youngest patient was 12 years old and the oldest was 19 years old. The modified version of the Puchalska-Wasyl Scale of Inner Speech was used for the study. The questionnaire was tailored to the capabilities of the persons with SCD and included questions about the occurrence of internal speech and the direction of this speech, that is, internal conversations to yourself (internal monologue) or to other people (internal dialogue). The patients participating in the experiment were informed in detail about the whole procedure and they or their parents, if they were under age, provided written consent for their participation in the experiment (according to the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration, 2008).\n\nStatistical analysis showed that in adolescents with SCD there is a statistically significant relationship in the frequency of the monologue and internal dialogue. Persons who declared a more frequent occurrence of internal dialogue also declared more frequent occurrences of internal monologue, which means that they had the general ability for inner speech. A comparison of the direction of inner speech, that is the internal monologue and internal dialogue has shown that during inner speech they more often use internal dialogue than internal monologue.\n\nIt was found that in adolescents with SCD, inner speech is present, and it manifests itself in the form of an internal monologue and internal dialogue. However, far more often do they use internal dialogue than internal monologue.\n\n","PeriodicalId":43280,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neuropsychologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neuropsychologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.1688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess self-reported individual differences in the use of the inner speech of adolescents with Social (Pragmatic) Communication Disorder (SCD) and in particular to answer the questions: Do adolescent with SCD have inner speech and what is the direction of this speech? Is this a monologue and internal dialogue, i.e., do they speak to themselves (internal monologue) or to other people (internal dialogue)? We tested 22 adolescents with SCD, diagnosed according to the DSM-5 criterion. The average age was 16.48 years, SD = 2.71. The youngest patient was 12 years old and the oldest was 19 years old. The modified version of the Puchalska-Wasyl Scale of Inner Speech was used for the study. The questionnaire was tailored to the capabilities of the persons with SCD and included questions about the occurrence of internal speech and the direction of this speech, that is, internal conversations to yourself (internal monologue) or to other people (internal dialogue). The patients participating in the experiment were informed in detail about the whole procedure and they or their parents, if they were under age, provided written consent for their participation in the experiment (according to the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration, 2008). Statistical analysis showed that in adolescents with SCD there is a statistically significant relationship in the frequency of the monologue and internal dialogue. Persons who declared a more frequent occurrence of internal dialogue also declared more frequent occurrences of internal monologue, which means that they had the general ability for inner speech. A comparison of the direction of inner speech, that is the internal monologue and internal dialogue has shown that during inner speech they more often use internal dialogue than internal monologue. It was found that in adolescents with SCD, inner speech is present, and it manifests itself in the form of an internal monologue and internal dialogue. However, far more often do they use internal dialogue than internal monologue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会(语用)沟通障碍青少年内在言语(内在独白和对话)的自我报告个体差异
该研究的目的是评估患有社交(语用)沟通障碍(SCD)的青少年在使用内部言语方面的自我报告的个体差异,特别是回答以下问题:患有SCD的青少年有内部言语吗?这种言语的方向是什么?这是独白和内部对话吗?也就是说,他们是对自己说话(内部独白)还是对别人说话(内部对话)?我们对22名根据DSM-5标准诊断为SCD的青少年进行了测试。平均年龄16.48岁,SD=2.71。年龄最小的患者为12岁,年龄最大的患者为19岁。这项研究使用了Puchalska Wasyl内部言语量表的修订版。该问卷是根据SCD患者的能力量身定制的,包括关于内部言论的发生和这种言论的方向的问题,即与自己(内部独白)或与他人(内部对话)的内部对话。参与实验的患者被详细告知整个过程,如果他们未成年,为他们参与实验提供了书面同意(根据2008年《赫尔辛基宣言》的指导方针)。统计分析表明,患有SCD的青少年在独白和内部对话的频率方面存在统计学上显著的关系。那些宣称内部对话更频繁发生的人也宣称内部独白更频繁发生,这意味着他们具有一般的内心话语能力。通过对内部独白和内部对话这两种内心话语的指向进行比较,发现在内心话语中,他们更多地使用内部对话而不是内部独白。研究发现,在患有SCD的青少年中,内心话语是存在的,它以内心独白和内心对话的形式表现出来。然而,他们更多地使用内部对话,而不是内部独白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
42.90%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM OF REHABILITATION OFFERED ACCORDING TO DIFFERENT THERAPEUTIC PROTOCOLS IN REDUCING CHRONIC FRONTAL SYNDROME IN PATIENTS 10-YEARS FOLLOWING NEUROSURGERY FOR POST-TRAUMATIC INTRACEREBRAL HEMATOMA Empathy as a determinant of perceived stress and styles of coping with stress in medical, law and psychology students NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF COVID-19: CURRENT APPROACH AND CLINICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FACTORS ASSOCIATED TO BURN-OUT AMONG IBN SINA HOSPITAL PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis in terms of psychosomatic effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1