From the margins to the mainstream: The online learning rethink and its implications for enhancing student equity

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.14742/ajet.8136
C. Stone
{"title":"From the margins to the mainstream: The online learning rethink and its implications for enhancing student equity","authors":"C. Stone","doi":"10.14742/ajet.8136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From being largely at the margins of higher education for many years, online learning now finds itself in the mainstream. This paper offers a critique of the online learning literature both pre- and post-2020, looking at changes in response to this shift. Evidence tells us that online learning plays a significant role in enhancing student equity, widening higher education access and participation for many students who would have found it difficult, if not impossible, to attend university on campus. This includes students from government-identified equity backgrounds, as well as other student cohorts underrepresented at university, such as older working students, parents, and others with caring responsibilities, and those from families with no previous experience of university. The mainstreaming and normalising of online learning now presents an opportunity for universities to learn from both past and emerging evidence, to evaluate past practice and offer a more flexible learning experience that better meets the needs of an even wider range of students. Keeping online learning firmly in the mainstream, while taking an evidence-based approach to ensuring the quality of its design and delivery, has the potential to enhance student equity on a much broader scale.\nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nImproving the quality of online learning, using evidence-based research to design and deliver it more effectively, will enable more students to stay and succeed at university.\nContinuing to offer online study options for all students, that is, keeping it in the mainstream, will further enhance student equity.\nMainstreaming online learning options as part of standard university practice will enable more students to benefit from the greater flexibility of both fully online and hybrid models.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

From being largely at the margins of higher education for many years, online learning now finds itself in the mainstream. This paper offers a critique of the online learning literature both pre- and post-2020, looking at changes in response to this shift. Evidence tells us that online learning plays a significant role in enhancing student equity, widening higher education access and participation for many students who would have found it difficult, if not impossible, to attend university on campus. This includes students from government-identified equity backgrounds, as well as other student cohorts underrepresented at university, such as older working students, parents, and others with caring responsibilities, and those from families with no previous experience of university. The mainstreaming and normalising of online learning now presents an opportunity for universities to learn from both past and emerging evidence, to evaluate past practice and offer a more flexible learning experience that better meets the needs of an even wider range of students. Keeping online learning firmly in the mainstream, while taking an evidence-based approach to ensuring the quality of its design and delivery, has the potential to enhance student equity on a much broader scale. Implications for practice or policy: Improving the quality of online learning, using evidence-based research to design and deliver it more effectively, will enable more students to stay and succeed at university. Continuing to offer online study options for all students, that is, keeping it in the mainstream, will further enhance student equity. Mainstreaming online learning options as part of standard university practice will enable more students to benefit from the greater flexibility of both fully online and hybrid models.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从边缘到主流:在线学习的反思及其对提高学生公平性的启示
多年来,在线学习一直处于高等教育的边缘,现在却成为主流。本文对2020年前后的在线学习文献进行了批判,着眼于应对这种转变的变化。证据告诉我们,在线学习在提高学生公平、扩大高等教育机会和参与方面发挥着重要作用,许多学生即使不是不可能,也很难在校园里上大学。这包括来自政府确定的公平背景的学生,以及在大学中代表性不足的其他学生群体,如年龄较大的在职学生、父母和其他有照顾责任的人,以及来自以前没有大学经历的家庭的学生。在线学习的主流化和正常化现在为大学提供了一个机会,可以从过去和新出现的证据中学习,评估过去的实践,并提供更灵活的学习体验,更好地满足更广泛学生的需求。保持在线学习的主流地位,同时采取循证方法确保其设计和交付的质量,有可能在更广泛的范围内提高学生的公平性。对实践或政策的影响:提高在线学习的质量,利用循证研究更有效地设计和提供在线学习,将使更多的学生留在大学并取得成功。继续为所有学生提供在线学习选项,也就是说,将其保持在主流,将进一步提高学生的公平性。将在线学习选项作为标准大学实践的一部分纳入主流,将使更多学生受益于完全在线和混合模式的更大灵活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Academics' perceptions of ChatGPT-generated written outputs: A practical application of Turing’s Imitation Game Effects of a ChatGPT-based flipped learning guiding approach on learners’ courseware project performances and perceptions University teachers’ well-being in ICT-enhanced teaching: The roles of teacher self-efficacy and teaching support Digital transformation in engineering education: Exploring the potential of AI-assisted learning Investigation of student experiences with ChatGPT-supported online learning applications in higher education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1