{"title":"Anticipatory guidance and children's oral health: A scoping review.","authors":"D Alshammari, Z Marshman, S El-Yousfi","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00208Alshammari06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anticipatory guidance (AG) involves providing parents with information about developmental milestones and promoting optimal development. Oral AG was first introduced as a comprehensive approach to provide age-appropriate oral health information and preventive interventions. The literature regarding this important topic has not yet been reviewed and summarised.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe the literature on AG provided to parents about their children's oral health and identify gaps in the current research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The scoping review mapped the existing peer-reviewed and guideline documents about AG and children's oral health using the framework established by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and modified by Levac et al. (2010). Firstly, we defined our research questions and searched the literature using Medline, Web of Science and Scopus. Secondly, we selected all types of literature and then applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and finally, we analysed and summarised the information using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three peer-reviewed articles and six guidelines were included. There was variation in how AG was described and defined. While some studies have evaluated the effectiveness of AG, most have investigated its short-term effectiveness only, with few interventional studies assessing this approach in the long-term.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While the concept of AG shows promise, there is no consensus within the current literature on a defined definition and there is a lack of long-term evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"175-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_00208Alshammari06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Anticipatory guidance (AG) involves providing parents with information about developmental milestones and promoting optimal development. Oral AG was first introduced as a comprehensive approach to provide age-appropriate oral health information and preventive interventions. The literature regarding this important topic has not yet been reviewed and summarised.
Aim: To describe the literature on AG provided to parents about their children's oral health and identify gaps in the current research.
Method: The scoping review mapped the existing peer-reviewed and guideline documents about AG and children's oral health using the framework established by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) and modified by Levac et al. (2010). Firstly, we defined our research questions and searched the literature using Medline, Web of Science and Scopus. Secondly, we selected all types of literature and then applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and finally, we analysed and summarised the information using thematic analysis.
Results: Forty-three peer-reviewed articles and six guidelines were included. There was variation in how AG was described and defined. While some studies have evaluated the effectiveness of AG, most have investigated its short-term effectiveness only, with few interventional studies assessing this approach in the long-term.
Conclusion: While the concept of AG shows promise, there is no consensus within the current literature on a defined definition and there is a lack of long-term evaluation.
背景预期指导(AG)涉及为父母提供有关发展里程碑的信息,并促进最佳发展。口腔AG最初是作为一种综合方法引入的,旨在提供适合年龄的口腔健康信息和预防干预措施。关于这一重要主题的文献尚未进行回顾和总结。目的描述向家长提供的关于儿童口腔健康的AG文献,并找出当前研究中的差距。方法范围界定审查使用Arksey和O'Malley(2005)建立并经Levac等人修改的框架,绘制了关于AG和儿童口腔健康的现有同行评审和指南文件。(2010)。首先,我们定义了我们的研究问题,并使用Medline、Web of Science和Scopus检索文献。其次,我们选择了所有类型的文献,然后应用了纳入和排除标准,最后,我们使用主题分析对信息进行了分析和总结。结果纳入了三篇同行评审文章和六条指南。AG的描述和定义各不相同。虽然一些研究评估了AG的有效性,但大多数研究只调查了其短期有效性,很少有干预性研究从长期评估这种方法。结论虽然AG的概念显示出前景,但目前的文献中对定义没有达成共识,也缺乏长期评估。
期刊介绍:
The journal is concerned with dental public health and related subjects. Dental public health is the science and the art of preventing oral disease, promoting oral health, and improving the quality of life through the organised efforts of society.
The discipline covers a wide range and includes such topics as:
-oral epidemiology-
oral health services research-
preventive dentistry - especially in relation to communities-
oral health education and promotion-
clinical research - with particular emphasis on the care of special groups-
behavioural sciences related to dentistry-
decision theory-
quality of life-
risk analysis-
ethics and oral health economics-
quality assessment.
The journal publishes scientific articles on the relevant fields, review articles, discussion papers, news items, and editorials. It is of interest to dentists working in dental public health and to other professionals concerned with disease prevention, health service planning, and health promotion throughout the world. In the case of epidemiology of oral diseases the Journal prioritises national studies unless local studies have major methodological innovations or information of particular interest.