Assessment of ESG practices in banks listed in [B]³

Égon José Mateus Celestino, Mércia de Lima Pereira, Renata Paes de Barros Câmara
{"title":"Assessment of ESG practices in banks listed in [B]³","authors":"Égon José Mateus Celestino, Mércia de Lima Pereira, Renata Paes de Barros Câmara","doi":"10.16930/2237-7662202333802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We sought to analyze whether the corporate governance characteristics of the Board of Directors (BoD), the capital structure, and the economic and financial performance of the firms influence the adoption of Environmental, Social, and Governance Policies (ESG) by banking institutions listed on the Brasil Bolsa Balcão [B]3. To this end, 24 banks listed in [B]3 were analyzed, via annual data made available from 2013 to 2020, in the Thomson Reuters® database and on the [[B]3 website, mainly through the analysis of Reference Forms of the institutions studied. To analyze the results, the Tobit regression model was estimated, using as a dependent variable the ‘assessment of ESG practices’, measured by an index ranging from 0 (for firms without ESG practices and/or without ESG assessment in the Refinitiv® database) to 100 (firms with best ESG practices) and, for independent variables, characterizations of banking firms and BoD, capital structure, and economic-financial performance indicators were used. Based on the results, it was noted that the size of the banks and the gender diversity of the BoD presented positive and significant statistics, demonstrating that larger banks with more women on the board tend to maintain ESG best practices. On the other hand, negative and significant statistical relationships were observed between the issuance of American Depositary Receive (ADRs), the number of independent Board members, and Board Interlocking (B.I.) practices and ESG best practices. However, the study contributes to the literature with the understanding of ESG events of Brazilian banks and with the regulatory demands of the Central Bank of Brazil as a result of the rules with requirements of Social and Environmental Responsibility by the regulatory body, as well as with the demands of stakeholders and the market for best ESG practices of banks.","PeriodicalId":30684,"journal":{"name":"Revista Catarinense da Ciencia Contabil","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Catarinense da Ciencia Contabil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16930/2237-7662202333802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We sought to analyze whether the corporate governance characteristics of the Board of Directors (BoD), the capital structure, and the economic and financial performance of the firms influence the adoption of Environmental, Social, and Governance Policies (ESG) by banking institutions listed on the Brasil Bolsa Balcão [B]3. To this end, 24 banks listed in [B]3 were analyzed, via annual data made available from 2013 to 2020, in the Thomson Reuters® database and on the [[B]3 website, mainly through the analysis of Reference Forms of the institutions studied. To analyze the results, the Tobit regression model was estimated, using as a dependent variable the ‘assessment of ESG practices’, measured by an index ranging from 0 (for firms without ESG practices and/or without ESG assessment in the Refinitiv® database) to 100 (firms with best ESG practices) and, for independent variables, characterizations of banking firms and BoD, capital structure, and economic-financial performance indicators were used. Based on the results, it was noted that the size of the banks and the gender diversity of the BoD presented positive and significant statistics, demonstrating that larger banks with more women on the board tend to maintain ESG best practices. On the other hand, negative and significant statistical relationships were observed between the issuance of American Depositary Receive (ADRs), the number of independent Board members, and Board Interlocking (B.I.) practices and ESG best practices. However, the study contributes to the literature with the understanding of ESG events of Brazilian banks and with the regulatory demands of the Central Bank of Brazil as a result of the rules with requirements of Social and Environmental Responsibility by the regulatory body, as well as with the demands of stakeholders and the market for best ESG practices of banks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[B] 3 .银行ESG实践评估
我们试图分析董事会(BoD)的公司治理特征、资本结构以及公司的经济和财务绩效是否影响在巴西证券交易所(Brasil Bolsa balc)上市的银行机构采用环境、社会和治理政策(ESG) [B]3。为此,本文主要通过分析所研究机构的参考表格,通过Thomson Reuters®数据库和[[B]3网站2013 - 2020年的年度数据,对[B]3中列出的24家银行进行了分析。为了分析结果,对Tobit回归模型进行了估计,使用“ESG实践评估”作为因变量,通过指数范围从0(对于没有ESG实践和/或没有在Refinitiv®数据库中进行ESG评估的公司)到100(具有最佳ESG实践的公司)进行测量,对于自变量,使用银行公司的特征和BoD,资本结构和经济财务绩效指标。根据结果,人们注意到,银行的规模和董事会的性别多样性呈现出积极和重要的统计数据,表明董事会中女性更多的大型银行倾向于保持ESG的最佳做法。另一方面,美国存托凭证(adr)发行量与独立董事会成员数量、董事会联锁(bi)实践和ESG最佳实践之间存在显著负相关关系。然而,该研究有助于理解巴西银行的ESG事件,以及监管机构对社会和环境责任要求的规则以及利益相关者和市场对银行最佳ESG实践的需求,从而对巴西央行的监管要求做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Transparência e Legibilidade dos Demonstrativos Contábeis do Governo do Estado do Ceará em tempos de Pandemia da Covid-19 Transparency and Readability of the Financial Statements of the Ceará Government during the Covid-19 Pandemic Transparência e Legibilidade dos Demonstrativos Contábeis do Governo do Estado do Ceará em tempos de Pandemia da Covid-19 Sistema de Avaliação de Desempenho Performance Appraisal System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1