Book Review: Judith Butler, Race and Education by C. Chadderton

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Adult Education Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-03-08 DOI:10.1177/07417136221081488
L. Bowman
{"title":"Book Review: Judith Butler, Race and Education by C. Chadderton","authors":"L. Bowman","doi":"10.1177/07417136221081488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Judith Butler, Race & Education, Chadderton (2018) undertakes the task of explaining how Butler’s work is applicable to understanding race and racism in society and how it may be applied to education in general. Butler’s work has been celebrated for its contributions to the fields of philosophy, gender studies, politics, sociology, religion, literary theory, ethics, cultural studies, education, and other fields. Butler is best known for her work on gender and social theory. Chadderton (2018) seeks to make Butler’s readers aware of the aspects of Butler’s work that directly address race and its significance. Recent research on race embraces the idea that race is a social construct. As such, race is not a scientific reality that is inherently present; instead, it is an arbitrary marker of identity that serves as a demarcation for social categorical assignment. Chadderton (2018) argues that Butler’s approach to understanding the reality of race in society is an alternative framework for understanding race. This is because Butler’s work focuses on “the operation of power, the formation of the subject, and the workings of marginalization” (p. 4). Butler’s approach views race as a hegemonic norm that forms subjects, and a performative, which is made to appear real through the repeated citations, acts, practices, and institutions which make it appear real. In Butler’s earlier work, she posited that gender was performative. Butler has noted that performance and performativity are not the same thing. She explains that we act in ways representative of being a man or that of being a woman as if being a man or woman is an internal reality. Butler argues that gender is a phenomenon that we produce and reproduce all the time through our actions. This notion of performativity rest on the assertion that nobody really has gender from the start. Through “performativity” we create gender. Butler’s view of gender is that it is constructed through acts that are in conformance with dominant social norms regarding gender. This same approach can be applied to race. The application of Butler’s approach to race would require that we reject the notion that race is an innate and natural part of an individual’s identity. The notion of performativity means that the different meanings of race are made to appear real because of the Book Reviews","PeriodicalId":47287,"journal":{"name":"Adult Education Quarterly","volume":"73 1","pages":"102 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adult Education Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07417136221081488","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Judith Butler, Race & Education, Chadderton (2018) undertakes the task of explaining how Butler’s work is applicable to understanding race and racism in society and how it may be applied to education in general. Butler’s work has been celebrated for its contributions to the fields of philosophy, gender studies, politics, sociology, religion, literary theory, ethics, cultural studies, education, and other fields. Butler is best known for her work on gender and social theory. Chadderton (2018) seeks to make Butler’s readers aware of the aspects of Butler’s work that directly address race and its significance. Recent research on race embraces the idea that race is a social construct. As such, race is not a scientific reality that is inherently present; instead, it is an arbitrary marker of identity that serves as a demarcation for social categorical assignment. Chadderton (2018) argues that Butler’s approach to understanding the reality of race in society is an alternative framework for understanding race. This is because Butler’s work focuses on “the operation of power, the formation of the subject, and the workings of marginalization” (p. 4). Butler’s approach views race as a hegemonic norm that forms subjects, and a performative, which is made to appear real through the repeated citations, acts, practices, and institutions which make it appear real. In Butler’s earlier work, she posited that gender was performative. Butler has noted that performance and performativity are not the same thing. She explains that we act in ways representative of being a man or that of being a woman as if being a man or woman is an internal reality. Butler argues that gender is a phenomenon that we produce and reproduce all the time through our actions. This notion of performativity rest on the assertion that nobody really has gender from the start. Through “performativity” we create gender. Butler’s view of gender is that it is constructed through acts that are in conformance with dominant social norms regarding gender. This same approach can be applied to race. The application of Butler’s approach to race would require that we reject the notion that race is an innate and natural part of an individual’s identity. The notion of performativity means that the different meanings of race are made to appear real because of the Book Reviews
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:Judith Butler,C.Chadderton的《种族与教育》
在朱迪思·巴特勒的《种族与教育》一书中,Chadderton(2018)承担了解释巴特勒的工作如何适用于理解社会中的种族和种族主义,以及如何将其应用于一般教育的任务。巴特勒的著作因其对哲学、性别研究、政治、社会学、宗教、文学理论、伦理学、文化研究、教育和其他领域的贡献而闻名。巴特勒最出名的是她在性别和社会理论方面的研究。Chadderton(2018)试图让巴特勒的读者意识到巴特勒的作品中直接涉及种族及其意义的方面。最近关于种族的研究接受了种族是一种社会建构的观点。因此,种族并不是一个固有存在的科学现实;相反,它是一个任意的身份标记,作为社会分类分配的界限。Chadderton(2018)认为,巴特勒理解社会中种族现实的方法是理解种族的另一种框架。这是因为巴特勒的作品关注“权力的运作,主体的形成,以及边缘化的运作”(第4页)。巴特勒的方法将种族视为一种霸权规范,它形成了主体,也是一种表演,通过重复的引用,行为,实践和制度使其看起来真实。在Butler早期的工作中,她假设性别是表现性的。巴特勒指出,表演和表演性不是一回事。她解释说,我们的行为方式代表着作为一个男人或一个女人,就好像作为一个男人或女人是一个内在的现实。巴特勒认为,性别是一种现象,是我们一直通过我们的行为产生和再生产的。这种表演性的概念建立在没有人从一开始就有性别的论断之上。通过“表演性”,我们创造了性别。巴特勒对性别的看法是,它是通过符合关于性别的主流社会规范的行为来构建的。同样的方法也适用于种族问题。把巴特勒的方法应用到种族问题上,要求我们摒弃种族是个人身份中固有的、自然的一部分的观念。表演性的概念意味着种族的不同含义因为书评而显得真实
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adult Education Quarterly
Adult Education Quarterly EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Adult Education Quarterly (AEQ) is a scholarly refereed journal committed to advancing the understanding and practice of adult and continuing education. The journal strives to be inclusive in scope, addressing topics and issues of significance to scholars and practitioners concerned with diverse aspects of adult and continuing education. AEQ publishes research employing a variety of methods and approaches, including (but not limited to) survey research, experimental designs, case studies, ethnographic observations and interviews, grounded theory, phenomenology, historical investigations, and narrative inquiry as well as articles that address theoretical and philosophical issues pertinent to adult and continuing education.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Adult Literacy in Morocco: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis of Program Effectiveness and Skill Development A School–University Partnership That Facilitates Adult-Specific Training: Perceptions of Life Sciences Teachers Book Review: Bridging Knowledge Cultures: Rebalancing Power in the Co-Construction of Knowledge by Lepore, W., L. B. Hall, & R. Tandon Experiences of Language in Migration: Communicating Well-Being in Finland and Germany Changing Intention to Participate in Adult Education and Training in Norway: Compositional and Motivational Factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1