Analysis of Media Bias—Glenn Beck TV Shows: A Content Analysis

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Creative Communications Pub Date : 2021-11-08 DOI:10.1177/09732586211048990
Rizwan Ahmad
{"title":"Analysis of Media Bias—Glenn Beck TV Shows: A Content Analysis","authors":"Rizwan Ahmad","doi":"10.1177/09732586211048990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study provides an overview of the media’s role in shaping public discourse and belief through framing news stories in a biased perspective and setting an agenda that is in keeping with the interests of the corporate and institutional funders of the media apparatus. Support for such an analysis is provided by a literature review that covers many critical aspects of news framing, agenda setting and cultivation theory, especially with respect to the emergence of a new ‘network society’. The ‘content analysis’ approach is utilised to search for biased content via the use of coders and decoders in some 140 randomly selected sampled links of the ‘Glenn Beck’ show during the two periods of time from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2010, and from 1 January 2011 to 30 June 2011, each of these periods consisting of 70 samples. The results ultimately show that the programme almost unilaterally provides supportive views of moral conservative values, and slight negative portrayals of Muslims. The programme presents critical views of President Obama and his policies, although the finding in opposing Obama’s policies is not statistically significant. The significance of these findings is discussed within the larger context of media bias and its influence on political reality, as well as public discourse and belief; although the study and hence, the findings suggesting ‘bias’ do not represent the entire media industry representing conservative values.","PeriodicalId":43888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732586211048990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study provides an overview of the media’s role in shaping public discourse and belief through framing news stories in a biased perspective and setting an agenda that is in keeping with the interests of the corporate and institutional funders of the media apparatus. Support for such an analysis is provided by a literature review that covers many critical aspects of news framing, agenda setting and cultivation theory, especially with respect to the emergence of a new ‘network society’. The ‘content analysis’ approach is utilised to search for biased content via the use of coders and decoders in some 140 randomly selected sampled links of the ‘Glenn Beck’ show during the two periods of time from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2010, and from 1 January 2011 to 30 June 2011, each of these periods consisting of 70 samples. The results ultimately show that the programme almost unilaterally provides supportive views of moral conservative values, and slight negative portrayals of Muslims. The programme presents critical views of President Obama and his policies, although the finding in opposing Obama’s policies is not statistically significant. The significance of these findings is discussed within the larger context of media bias and its influence on political reality, as well as public discourse and belief; although the study and hence, the findings suggesting ‘bias’ do not represent the entire media industry representing conservative values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
媒体偏见分析——格伦·贝克电视节目:一个内容分析
本研究概述了媒体在塑造公众话语和信仰方面的作用,方法是从有偏见的角度构建新闻故事,并制定符合媒体机构的企业和机构资助者利益的议程。一篇文献综述为这一分析提供了支持,该综述涵盖了新闻框架、议程设置和培养理论的许多关键方面,尤其是关于新“网络社会”的出现。“内容分析”方法用于通过在2010年1月1日至2010年6月30日和2011年1月30日这两个时间段内,在“格伦·贝克”节目的大约140个随机选择的采样链接中使用编码器和解码器来搜索有偏见的内容,每个时间段由70个样本组成。结果最终表明,该节目几乎单方面地提供了对道德保守价值观的支持,并对穆斯林进行了轻微的负面描述。该节目对奥巴马总统及其政策提出了批评意见,尽管反对奥巴马政策的调查结果在统计上并不显著。这些发现的意义是在媒体偏见及其对政治现实以及公共话语和信仰的影响的大背景下讨论的;尽管这项研究以及由此得出的结论表明,“偏见”并不代表整个媒体行业代表的保守价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
26.70%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Communications promotes inquiry into contemporary communication issues within wider social, economic, marketing, cultural, technological and management contexts, and provides a forum for the discussion of theoretical and practical insights emerging from such inquiry. The journal encourages a new language of analysis for contemporary communications research and publishes articles dealing with innovative and alternate ways of doing research that push the frontiers of conceptual dialogue in communication theory and practice. The journal engages with a wide range of issues and themes in the areas of cultural studies, digital media, media studies, technoculture, marketing communication, organizational communication, communication management, mass and new media, and development communication, among others. JOCC is a double blind peer reviewed journal.
期刊最新文献
Customer Engagement Through Transformational Campaigns: A Netnographic Exploration on the Storytelling Power of ‘Jaago Re’ Let Us Excite and Inspire Consumers to Recycle! Spokescharacters as Effective Environmental Communicators High Visual Complexity or Low Visual Complexity: A Study Related to Food Advertising on Instagram Sensemaking and Persuasive Sensegiving: The Thank You North East Regional COVID-19 Campaign, the Brief We Never Wanted! Role of COVID-19 Caller Tune and Intention to Get Vaccinated: An Application of the Health Belief Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1