Preface to the special issue on the Yaponesia Genome Project
N. Saitou
求助PDF
{"title":"Preface to the special issue on the Yaponesia Genome Project","authors":"N. Saitou","doi":"10.1537/ASE.210114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© 2021 The Anthropological Society of Nippon We started the five-year ‘Yaponesia Genome Project’ in 2018. This project is one of those funded by a MEXT Grantin-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas. The project home page is at http://www.yaponesian.jp/index_e. php. I am leader of this project. Please also see the introduction of this project reported by the Yaponesian Genome Project Managing Group (2020) in the new journal iDarwin. There are six research groups in this project as follows (* indicates the principal investigator of each group). Group A01—study modern human genomes. Members: Naruya Saitou*, Ituro Inoue, Koichiro Yoshiura, Timothy A. Jinam, and Masatoshi Matsunami. Group A02—study ancient human genomes. Members: Ken-ichi Shinoda*, Noboru Adachi, Tsuneo Kakuda, Takehiro Sato, and Hideaki Kanzawa-Kiriyama. Group A03—study animal and plant genomes. Members: Hitoshi Suzuki*, Ryuichi Masuda, Takeshi Itoh, and Toshinori Endo. Group B01—study archeological data. Members: Shin’ichiro Fujio*, Naoko Kinoshita, Akira Seike, Yasuhiro Yamada, and Tatsuhiko Hamada. Group B02—study linguistic data. Members: Mitsuaki Endo, Nobuko Kibe, Shigehisa Karimata, Hiroshi Nakagawa, and Shinjiro Kazama. Group B03—study new genome data. Members: Naoki Osada*, Yosuke Kawai, Akihiko Fujimoto, and Jun Gojobori. There are also two-year limited research groups A04 and B04 as follows. Group A04 members: Kosuke Hanada, Kazuyoshi Hosomichi, Tadashi Imanishi, Ryosuke Kimura, Ken Naito, Kazuhiro Nakayama, Jun Ohashi, Hiroki Oota, Yoichi Sato, Kazuhiro Satomura, and Yohey Terai. Group B04 members: Reiko Aso, Kyoko Funahashi, Yuka Hayashi, Masakado Kawata, Takumi Nishiuchi, and Masami Takenaka. Professor Hiroki Oota of The University of Tokyo, who is a member of Group A04, is also editor-in-chief of Anthropological Science. He kindly offered to publish a special issue of Anthropological Science on the Yaponesia Genome Project. I thus asked the principal investigators of the six research groups to contribute either a review or an original investigation of their research area to Anthropological Science. Group B01 declined to contribute an article; however, Professor Oota himself contributed one review article to this issue. Thus, there are six articles, four original investigations and two reviews, in this special issue as follows. Two review articles were contributed by Group B03 (Osada and Kawai) and by Group A04 (Koganebuchi and Oota). Osada and Kawai (2021) reviewed usage of genomewide SNP data for estimating human migrations to Yaponesia. Koganebuchi and Oota (2021) reviewed human paleogenomic studies in East Asia including Yaponesia. Although it is a review article, Osada and Kawai (2021) found a weak but significant genetic tie of Jomon people to ancient North Siberians through meta-analysis of publicly available datasets. Four original articles were contributed by Groups A01 and B03 (Jinam, Kawai, and Saitou), Group A02 (Adachi, Kanzawa-Kiriyama, Nara, Kakuda, Nishida, and Shinoda), Group A03 (Suzuki), and Group B02 (Endo). Jinam et al. (2021b) analyzed three datasets of modern Yaponesian genomes, and showed that the ‘inner dualstructure’ model of Yaponesia proposed and discussed by Saitou (2015, 2017), Saitou and Jinam (2017), and Jinam et al. (2021a) is compatible with these datasets. Adachi et al. (2021) reported the first Jomon genome data from the Higashimyo shell midden site, Kyushu, dated c. 8000 years ago. Their principal-components analysis shows that the genome of Hokkaido Jomon people reported by Kanzawa-Kiriyama et al. (2019) and that of Kyushu Jomon reported by Adachi et al. (2021) are very similar, suggesting striking homogeneity of the Jomon people over a long time. Suzuki (2021) examined the substitution rates of rodent mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), and showed the existence of a time dependence of those evolutionary rates. Based on this finding and using mtDNA data reported by Li et al. (2020), he suggested there were two waves of mice migration to Yaponesia: one by the subspecies M. m. castaneus 3500– 3000 years ago and the other by the subspecies M. m. musculus around 2700 years ago. These two migrations fit pretty well with the second and third migrations of humans to Yaponesia proposed by Saitou (2017). Endo (2021) examined four kinds of toponyms from a literature on the history of three kingdoms in the southern part of the Korean peninsula by Busik et al. (1145). He concluded that Japonic-speaking people still dwelled in the central area of the peninsula and in the northern area of the Yalu River during the three-kingdom period up to the 7th century A.D. I hope these six articles are useful for researchers studying the origin and developments of Yaponesians. Anthropological Science Vol. 129(1), 1–2, 2021","PeriodicalId":50751,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1537/ASE.210114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
© 2021 The Anthropological Society of Nippon We started the five-year ‘Yaponesia Genome Project’ in 2018. This project is one of those funded by a MEXT Grantin-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas. The project home page is at http://www.yaponesian.jp/index_e. php. I am leader of this project. Please also see the introduction of this project reported by the Yaponesian Genome Project Managing Group (2020) in the new journal iDarwin. There are six research groups in this project as follows (* indicates the principal investigator of each group). Group A01—study modern human genomes. Members: Naruya Saitou*, Ituro Inoue, Koichiro Yoshiura, Timothy A. Jinam, and Masatoshi Matsunami. Group A02—study ancient human genomes. Members: Ken-ichi Shinoda*, Noboru Adachi, Tsuneo Kakuda, Takehiro Sato, and Hideaki Kanzawa-Kiriyama. Group A03—study animal and plant genomes. Members: Hitoshi Suzuki*, Ryuichi Masuda, Takeshi Itoh, and Toshinori Endo. Group B01—study archeological data. Members: Shin’ichiro Fujio*, Naoko Kinoshita, Akira Seike, Yasuhiro Yamada, and Tatsuhiko Hamada. Group B02—study linguistic data. Members: Mitsuaki Endo, Nobuko Kibe, Shigehisa Karimata, Hiroshi Nakagawa, and Shinjiro Kazama. Group B03—study new genome data. Members: Naoki Osada*, Yosuke Kawai, Akihiko Fujimoto, and Jun Gojobori. There are also two-year limited research groups A04 and B04 as follows. Group A04 members: Kosuke Hanada, Kazuyoshi Hosomichi, Tadashi Imanishi, Ryosuke Kimura, Ken Naito, Kazuhiro Nakayama, Jun Ohashi, Hiroki Oota, Yoichi Sato, Kazuhiro Satomura, and Yohey Terai. Group B04 members: Reiko Aso, Kyoko Funahashi, Yuka Hayashi, Masakado Kawata, Takumi Nishiuchi, and Masami Takenaka. Professor Hiroki Oota of The University of Tokyo, who is a member of Group A04, is also editor-in-chief of Anthropological Science. He kindly offered to publish a special issue of Anthropological Science on the Yaponesia Genome Project. I thus asked the principal investigators of the six research groups to contribute either a review or an original investigation of their research area to Anthropological Science. Group B01 declined to contribute an article; however, Professor Oota himself contributed one review article to this issue. Thus, there are six articles, four original investigations and two reviews, in this special issue as follows. Two review articles were contributed by Group B03 (Osada and Kawai) and by Group A04 (Koganebuchi and Oota). Osada and Kawai (2021) reviewed usage of genomewide SNP data for estimating human migrations to Yaponesia. Koganebuchi and Oota (2021) reviewed human paleogenomic studies in East Asia including Yaponesia. Although it is a review article, Osada and Kawai (2021) found a weak but significant genetic tie of Jomon people to ancient North Siberians through meta-analysis of publicly available datasets. Four original articles were contributed by Groups A01 and B03 (Jinam, Kawai, and Saitou), Group A02 (Adachi, Kanzawa-Kiriyama, Nara, Kakuda, Nishida, and Shinoda), Group A03 (Suzuki), and Group B02 (Endo). Jinam et al. (2021b) analyzed three datasets of modern Yaponesian genomes, and showed that the ‘inner dualstructure’ model of Yaponesia proposed and discussed by Saitou (2015, 2017), Saitou and Jinam (2017), and Jinam et al. (2021a) is compatible with these datasets. Adachi et al. (2021) reported the first Jomon genome data from the Higashimyo shell midden site, Kyushu, dated c. 8000 years ago. Their principal-components analysis shows that the genome of Hokkaido Jomon people reported by Kanzawa-Kiriyama et al. (2019) and that of Kyushu Jomon reported by Adachi et al. (2021) are very similar, suggesting striking homogeneity of the Jomon people over a long time. Suzuki (2021) examined the substitution rates of rodent mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), and showed the existence of a time dependence of those evolutionary rates. Based on this finding and using mtDNA data reported by Li et al. (2020), he suggested there were two waves of mice migration to Yaponesia: one by the subspecies M. m. castaneus 3500– 3000 years ago and the other by the subspecies M. m. musculus around 2700 years ago. These two migrations fit pretty well with the second and third migrations of humans to Yaponesia proposed by Saitou (2017). Endo (2021) examined four kinds of toponyms from a literature on the history of three kingdoms in the southern part of the Korean peninsula by Busik et al. (1145). He concluded that Japonic-speaking people still dwelled in the central area of the peninsula and in the northern area of the Yalu River during the three-kingdom period up to the 7th century A.D. I hope these six articles are useful for researchers studying the origin and developments of Yaponesians. Anthropological Science Vol. 129(1), 1–2, 2021
雅本西亚基因组计划特刊前言
©2021日本人类学学会我们于2018年启动了为期五年的“雅本西亚基因组计划”。本项目为“创新领域科学研究资助计划”资助项目之一。该项目的主页在http://www.yaponesian.jp/index_e。php。我是这个项目的负责人。请参见雅本尼西亚基因组计划管理小组(2020)在新杂志《达尔文》上报道的该项目的介绍。本项目共设6个课题组,具体如下(*表示每个课题组的负责人)。a01组——研究现代人类基因组。成员:齐藤鸣也*、井上伊图郎、吉浦光一郎、提摩太A.吉南、松上正敏。a02组研究古代人类基因组。成员:筱田健一*、安达信郎、角田恒雄、佐藤武宏、金泽秀明。a03组-研究动物和植物基因组。成员:铃木仁*、增田龙一、伊藤武、远藤俊典。小组b01 -研究考古资料。成员:藤尾信一郎*、木下直子、成池明、山田康弘、滨田达彦。小组b02 -研究语言资料。成员:远藤三明、木部信子、Karimata重久、中川宏、Kazama慎次郎。小组b03研究新的基因组数据。成员:大田直树*、川合洋介、藤本明彦、Gojobori君。另外还有为期两年的有限研究小组A04和B04如下。A04组成员:花田光介、细道和吉、今西正、木村良介、内藤健、中山和宏、大桥俊、大田博树、佐藤洋一、中村和宏、寺井洋一。B04组成员:麻生玲子、船桥京子、林由香、川田雅昌、西内拓美、竹中雅美。A04小组成员、东京大学教授大田弘树兼任《人类学》总编辑。他好心地提出要出版一期《人类学科学》关于雅本西亚基因组计划的特刊。因此,我请这六个研究小组的主要研究人员向《人类学科学》提交一份关于其研究领域的综述或原创性调查报告。B01组拒绝发表文章;然而,Oota教授自己为这个问题贡献了一篇评论文章。因此,本期特刊共有六篇文章,四篇原创调查,两篇综述,内容如下。两篇综述文章由B03组(Osada和Kawai)和A04组(Koganebuchi和Oota)贡献。Osada和Kawai(2021)回顾了全基因组SNP数据用于估计人类向雅彭西亚迁移的使用情况。Koganebuchi和Oota(2021)回顾了包括雅本西亚在内的东亚地区的人类古基因组研究。虽然这是一篇综述文章,但Osada和Kawai(2021)通过对公开数据集的荟萃分析,发现绳纹人和古代北西伯利亚人之间存在微弱但重要的遗传联系。四篇原创文章由A01组和B03组(Jinam、Kawai和saiitou)、A02组(Adachi、Kanzawa-Kiriyama、Nara、Kakuda、Nishida和Shinoda)、A03组(Suzuki)和B02组(Endo)贡献。Jinam et al. (2021b)分析了3个现代雅本西亚基因组数据集,结果表明,Saitou(2015、2017)、Saitou和Jinam(2017)以及Jinam et al. (2021a)提出并讨论的雅本西亚“内部二元结构”模型与这些数据集兼容。Adachi et al.(2021)报道了来自九州Higashimyo贝壳堆遗址的第一个绳纹基因组数据,该数据可追溯到约8000年前。他们的主成分分析表明,Kanzawa-Kiriyama等人(2019)报告的北海道绳纹人基因组与Adachi等人(2021)报告的九州绳纹人基因组非常相似,表明绳纹人在很长一段时间内具有惊人的同质性。Suzuki(2021)研究了啮齿动物线粒体DNA (mtDNA)的替代率,并表明这些进化率存在时间依赖性。基于这一发现,并使用Li等人(2020)报道的mtDNA数据,他认为有两波小鼠迁移到雅波onesia:一波是3500 - 3000年前的M. M. castaneus亚种,另一波是2700年前的M. M. musus亚种。这两次迁徙与Saitou(2017)提出的人类第二次和第三次迁徙到雅本西亚非常吻合。远藤(2021)从Busik等人(1145)的朝鲜半岛南部三国历史文献中考察了四种地名。他的结论是,直到公元7世纪的三国时期,讲日语的人仍然居住在半岛中部和鸭绿江北部地区。我希望这六篇文章对研究雅本人的起源和发展有帮助。人类学Vol. 29(1), 1 - 2, 2021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。