Incumbent policy, benefits provision, and the triggering and spread of revolutionary uprisings

IF 1.1 Q3 ECONOMICS Economics of Peace and Security Journal Pub Date : 2017-04-05 DOI:10.15355/EPSJ.12.1.54
K. Hausken, Mthuli Ncube
{"title":"Incumbent policy, benefits provision, and the triggering and spread of revolutionary uprisings","authors":"K. Hausken, Mthuli Ncube","doi":"10.15355/EPSJ.12.1.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes revolutionary uprisings, such as the Arab spring of 2011. Revolutions occur with an inherent probability dependent on a country’s characteristics. A country’s incumbent leader can decrease this probability by providing benefits to a population, e.g., public goods such as necessities of life, health care, safety, and education. We equate the probability of revolution with Granovetter’s equilibrium proportion of a population that joins a revolution. Decreased benefits provision increases the share of revolutionaries which, in turn, decreases the cost of revolt which helps resolve the free-rider problem implicit in revolting. The article quantifies how the incumbent chooses whether or not to provide benefits, and how many benefits to provide. We account for the unit cost of providing benefits and for the effects of the benefits provided, adjusted for whether the inherent revolution probability is low or high. Combining the modeling approaches, i.e., how revolutions spread and how the incumbent provides benefits, enriches our understanding of which factors affect revolutions and of how populations and their incumbent leaders interact. The model helps to understand the logic of revolutionary uprisings and how they can be curtailed.","PeriodicalId":43334,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Peace and Security Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"54-63"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Peace and Security Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15355/EPSJ.12.1.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

This article analyzes revolutionary uprisings, such as the Arab spring of 2011. Revolutions occur with an inherent probability dependent on a country’s characteristics. A country’s incumbent leader can decrease this probability by providing benefits to a population, e.g., public goods such as necessities of life, health care, safety, and education. We equate the probability of revolution with Granovetter’s equilibrium proportion of a population that joins a revolution. Decreased benefits provision increases the share of revolutionaries which, in turn, decreases the cost of revolt which helps resolve the free-rider problem implicit in revolting. The article quantifies how the incumbent chooses whether or not to provide benefits, and how many benefits to provide. We account for the unit cost of providing benefits and for the effects of the benefits provided, adjusted for whether the inherent revolution probability is low or high. Combining the modeling approaches, i.e., how revolutions spread and how the incumbent provides benefits, enriches our understanding of which factors affect revolutions and of how populations and their incumbent leaders interact. The model helps to understand the logic of revolutionary uprisings and how they can be curtailed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现行政策、福利的提供以及革命起义的引发和蔓延
本文分析了革命起义,如2011年的阿拉伯之春。革命发生的内在可能性取决于一个国家的特点。一个国家的现任领导人可以通过向民众提供福利来降低这种可能性,例如生活必需品、医疗保健、安全和教育等公共产品。我们将革命的概率等同于加入革命的人口中Granovetter的均衡比例。福利的减少增加了革命者的比例,反过来又降低了起义的成本,这有助于解决起义中隐含的搭便车问题。这篇文章量化了在职者如何选择是否提供福利,以及提供多少福利。我们考虑了提供福利的单位成本和所提供福利的影响,并根据固有革命概率是低还是高进行了调整。结合建模方法,即革命如何传播和现任领导人如何提供利益,丰富了我们对哪些因素影响革命以及民众及其现任领导人如何互动的理解。该模型有助于理解革命起义的逻辑以及如何遏制革命起义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
The future of the European defense firm Strategic competition: Toward a genuine step-change for Europe’s defense industry? The future of cooperative programs in Europe, paradox of a hybrid market 50 shades of procurement: the European defense trilemma in defense procurement strategies Symposium introduction: European defense from the perspective of the Ukraine war
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1