The cost of intersectionality: Motherhood, mental health, and the state of the country

IF 4 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2022-07-23 DOI:10.1111/josi.12539
Jasmine L. Garland McKinney, LaReine M. Meinersmann
{"title":"The cost of intersectionality: Motherhood, mental health, and the state of the country","authors":"Jasmine L. Garland McKinney,&nbsp;LaReine M. Meinersmann","doi":"10.1111/josi.12539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and society's overdue racial awakening (Worland, 2020) have created distinct needs for mothers, especially mothers of Color (MOC) in the United States (US) (Breman et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021). Prior to the double pandemic (see Addo, 2020), expectations that mothers devote themselves entirely to their children may support increases in mental health symptomology within this population (Rahman et al., 2013). Based on systemic inequities that reside at the foundation of many institutions (e.g., healthcare, law, education) within the US, MOC experience increased worry, anxiety, stress, and fear during the double pandemic (Liu et al., 2021). In addition, MOC engage in mothering practices (e.g., racial socialization) that are unique to raising children who identify as Black, Indigenous, and Persons of Color (BIPOC) (Hughes &amp; Chen et al., 1997). Based on these facts, the authors investigate the sociocultural forces that impact MOC's mental health during the context of the double pandemic through a review of existent literature on this topic. The authors’ analysis and incorporation of intersectionality theory and Black feminist thought uncovers the ways in which these forces may influence the experiences of MOC. Finally, the authors utilize an intersectional-based policy analysis framework (Hankivsky et al., 2014) to provide recommendations for social policy, education and training, and directions for future research. These recommendations acknowledge the influence of power and privilege in the US while building upon the protective factors that support MOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/josi.12539","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.12539","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and society's overdue racial awakening (Worland, 2020) have created distinct needs for mothers, especially mothers of Color (MOC) in the United States (US) (Breman et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021). Prior to the double pandemic (see Addo, 2020), expectations that mothers devote themselves entirely to their children may support increases in mental health symptomology within this population (Rahman et al., 2013). Based on systemic inequities that reside at the foundation of many institutions (e.g., healthcare, law, education) within the US, MOC experience increased worry, anxiety, stress, and fear during the double pandemic (Liu et al., 2021). In addition, MOC engage in mothering practices (e.g., racial socialization) that are unique to raising children who identify as Black, Indigenous, and Persons of Color (BIPOC) (Hughes & Chen et al., 1997). Based on these facts, the authors investigate the sociocultural forces that impact MOC's mental health during the context of the double pandemic through a review of existent literature on this topic. The authors’ analysis and incorporation of intersectionality theory and Black feminist thought uncovers the ways in which these forces may influence the experiences of MOC. Finally, the authors utilize an intersectional-based policy analysis framework (Hankivsky et al., 2014) to provide recommendations for social policy, education and training, and directions for future research. These recommendations acknowledge the influence of power and privilege in the US while building upon the protective factors that support MOC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交叉性的代价:母亲身份、心理健康和国家状况
冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行和社会迟来的种族觉醒(Worland,2020)对母亲产生了独特的需求,尤其是美国的有色人种母亲(MOC)(Breman等人,2021;刘等人,2021)。在双重疫情之前(见Addo,2020),母亲完全致力于孩子的期望可能会支持这一人群中心理健康症状的增加(Rahman等人,2013)。基于美国许多机构(如医疗保健、法律、教育)基础上存在的系统性不平等,主运行中心在双疫情期间经历了更多的担忧、焦虑、压力和恐惧(Liu et al.,2021)。此外,MOC参与养育黑人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC)儿童所特有的育儿实践(如种族社会化)(Hughes&Chen等人,1997)。基于这些事实,作者通过回顾有关这一主题的现有文献,调查了在双疫情背景下影响MOC心理健康的社会文化力量。作者对交叉性理论和黑人女权主义思想的分析和融合揭示了这些力量可能影响MOC经历的方式。最后,作者利用基于跨部门的政策分析框架(Hankivsky et al.,2014)为社会政策、教育和培训以及未来研究方向提供建议。这些建议承认了美国权力和特权的影响,同时建立在支持主运行中心的保护因素之上。[发件人]《社会问题杂志》的版权归Wiley Blackwell所有,未经版权持有人明确书面许可,不得将其内容复制或通过电子邮件发送到多个网站或发布到列表服务。但是,用户可以打印、下载或通过电子邮件发送文章供个人使用。这可能会被删节。对复印件的准确性不作任何保证。用户应参考材料的原始发布版本以获取完整信息。(版权适用于所有人。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial correlates of LGBTIQ+ experiences in selected African countries: Reimagining LGBTIQ+ research Understanding variations in LGBTIQ+ acceptance across space and time: The importance of norm perceptions and political dynamics Centering the margins: Reimagining resilience and resistance for transgender and nonbinary people of color The opportunities and limits of open science for LGBTIQ+ research Both‐Sideology Endangers Democracy and Social Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1