Red Modernism: American Poetry and the Spirit of Communism by Mark Steven, and: Poet-Critics and the Administration of Culture by Evan Kindley (review)

IF 0.1 N/A POETRY WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW Pub Date : 2019-05-07 DOI:10.1353/WCW.2019.0003
Stephen Hahn
{"title":"Red Modernism: American Poetry and the Spirit of Communism by Mark Steven, and: Poet-Critics and the Administration of Culture by Evan Kindley (review)","authors":"Stephen Hahn","doi":"10.1353/WCW.2019.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making sense of William Carlos Williams’s political commitments continues to be of interest in all its rather complicated forms and iterations. One recent, ambitious approach is that of Mark Steven in Red Modernism: American Poetry and the Spirit of Communism, a book apparently timed to appear in October 2017 on the anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution. Appear it did, staking a claim on links connecting Williams, Pound, and Zukofsky not just as modernist poetic innovators and experimenters, and thus literary revolutionists of sorts, but as poets deeply implicated in the politics of communist revolution in the twentieth century. Less specifically devoted to Williams, and somewhat in contrast to Steven’s enlistment of Williams as a revolutionist through the implications of style and genre, Poet Critics and the Administration of Culture by Evan Kindley, portrays the attenuation of the radical impulses of modernism as the twentieth century wore on and Cold War liberalism as a strategic safe zone for careerists in poetry. BOOK REVIEW","PeriodicalId":53869,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/WCW.2019.0003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/WCW.2019.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Making sense of William Carlos Williams’s political commitments continues to be of interest in all its rather complicated forms and iterations. One recent, ambitious approach is that of Mark Steven in Red Modernism: American Poetry and the Spirit of Communism, a book apparently timed to appear in October 2017 on the anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution. Appear it did, staking a claim on links connecting Williams, Pound, and Zukofsky not just as modernist poetic innovators and experimenters, and thus literary revolutionists of sorts, but as poets deeply implicated in the politics of communist revolution in the twentieth century. Less specifically devoted to Williams, and somewhat in contrast to Steven’s enlistment of Williams as a revolutionist through the implications of style and genre, Poet Critics and the Administration of Culture by Evan Kindley, portrays the attenuation of the radical impulses of modernism as the twentieth century wore on and Cold War liberalism as a strategic safe zone for careerists in poetry. BOOK REVIEW
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马克·史蒂文的《红色现代主义:美国诗歌与共产主义精神》和埃文·金德利的《诗人批评家与文化管理》(书评)
理解威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯(William Carlos Williams)的政治承诺,在其相当复杂的形式和迭代中,仍然是一个有趣的问题。最近,马克·史蒂文(Mark Steven)在《红色现代主义:美国诗歌和共产主义精神》(Red Modernism: American Poetry and Spirit of Communism)中提出了一个雄心勃勃的方法,这本书显然定于2017年10月布尔什维克革命周年纪念日出版。看来确实如此,它声称威廉姆斯、庞德和祖可夫斯基之间的联系不仅是现代主义诗歌的革新者和实验者,因此是各种各样的文学革命家,而且是与二十世纪共产主义革命政治有深刻牵连的诗人。埃文·金德利的《诗人批评家与文化管理》没有特别提到威廉姆斯,与史蒂文通过风格和体裁的暗示把威廉姆斯作为革命者相比,它描绘了20世纪现代主义激进冲动的衰减,以及冷战时期自由主义作为诗歌野心家的战略安全区。书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
“No One to Witness and Adjust”: The Academy Still in Peril Spring and All No Longer in Peril Spring and All: The Present 100 Years Later Modernist Hangover? William Carlos Williams as Bob Perelman’s Poetic Cure Which Side Are You On?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1