Red Modernism: American Poetry and the Spirit of Communism by Mark Steven, and: Poet-Critics and the Administration of Culture by Evan Kindley (review)
{"title":"Red Modernism: American Poetry and the Spirit of Communism by Mark Steven, and: Poet-Critics and the Administration of Culture by Evan Kindley (review)","authors":"Stephen Hahn","doi":"10.1353/WCW.2019.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Making sense of William Carlos Williams’s political commitments continues to be of interest in all its rather complicated forms and iterations. One recent, ambitious approach is that of Mark Steven in Red Modernism: American Poetry and the Spirit of Communism, a book apparently timed to appear in October 2017 on the anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution. Appear it did, staking a claim on links connecting Williams, Pound, and Zukofsky not just as modernist poetic innovators and experimenters, and thus literary revolutionists of sorts, but as poets deeply implicated in the politics of communist revolution in the twentieth century. Less specifically devoted to Williams, and somewhat in contrast to Steven’s enlistment of Williams as a revolutionist through the implications of style and genre, Poet Critics and the Administration of Culture by Evan Kindley, portrays the attenuation of the radical impulses of modernism as the twentieth century wore on and Cold War liberalism as a strategic safe zone for careerists in poetry. BOOK REVIEW","PeriodicalId":53869,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","volume":"36 1","pages":"47 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/WCW.2019.0003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM CARLOS WILLIAMS REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/WCW.2019.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"POETRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Making sense of William Carlos Williams’s political commitments continues to be of interest in all its rather complicated forms and iterations. One recent, ambitious approach is that of Mark Steven in Red Modernism: American Poetry and the Spirit of Communism, a book apparently timed to appear in October 2017 on the anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution. Appear it did, staking a claim on links connecting Williams, Pound, and Zukofsky not just as modernist poetic innovators and experimenters, and thus literary revolutionists of sorts, but as poets deeply implicated in the politics of communist revolution in the twentieth century. Less specifically devoted to Williams, and somewhat in contrast to Steven’s enlistment of Williams as a revolutionist through the implications of style and genre, Poet Critics and the Administration of Culture by Evan Kindley, portrays the attenuation of the radical impulses of modernism as the twentieth century wore on and Cold War liberalism as a strategic safe zone for careerists in poetry. BOOK REVIEW
理解威廉·卡洛斯·威廉姆斯(William Carlos Williams)的政治承诺,在其相当复杂的形式和迭代中,仍然是一个有趣的问题。最近,马克·史蒂文(Mark Steven)在《红色现代主义:美国诗歌和共产主义精神》(Red Modernism: American Poetry and Spirit of Communism)中提出了一个雄心勃勃的方法,这本书显然定于2017年10月布尔什维克革命周年纪念日出版。看来确实如此,它声称威廉姆斯、庞德和祖可夫斯基之间的联系不仅是现代主义诗歌的革新者和实验者,因此是各种各样的文学革命家,而且是与二十世纪共产主义革命政治有深刻牵连的诗人。埃文·金德利的《诗人批评家与文化管理》没有特别提到威廉姆斯,与史蒂文通过风格和体裁的暗示把威廉姆斯作为革命者相比,它描绘了20世纪现代主义激进冲动的衰减,以及冷战时期自由主义作为诗歌野心家的战略安全区。书评