Extending the cognitive-behavioral model of Body Dysmorphic Disorder: The role of attachment anxiety and self-ambivalence

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100803
Daniel B. Fassnacht , Kathina Ali , Michael Kyrios
{"title":"Extending the cognitive-behavioral model of Body Dysmorphic Disorder: The role of attachment anxiety and self-ambivalence","authors":"Daniel B. Fassnacht ,&nbsp;Kathina Ali ,&nbsp;Michael Kyrios","doi":"10.1016/j.jocrd.2023.100803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to extend the cognitive-behavioral model of Body Dysmorphic Disorder<span> (BDD) by exploring the role of insecure attachment and self-ambivalence on the relationship between two specific cognitive factors, namely appearance orientation (seeing the self as an aesthetic object) and appearance evaluation (negative appraisal of internal body image), on levels of BDD severity. A convenience sample of 304 Australian residents (72.4% females) completed online self-report measures; 53% reported clinical or subclinical levels of BDD. Attachment anxiety and self-ambivalence were both associated with BDD severity, as were both cognitive factors. The direct effect of attachment anxiety was no longer significant after controlling for self-ambivalence, appearance orientation and evaluation. However, significant specific indirect effects were found suggesting that individuals who report greater levels of insecure attachment and self-ambivalence exhibit greater appearance orientation and negative appearance evaluation which, in turn, results in higher levels of BDD. The indirect effect through self-ambivalence was strongest suggesting a central role of self in the relationship between attachment anxiety and BDD severity. The current research demonstrates the importance of attachment anxiety and self-ambivalence in the context of BDD and implicates their potential role in treatment; however, further clinical studies are needed.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211364923000246","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to extend the cognitive-behavioral model of Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) by exploring the role of insecure attachment and self-ambivalence on the relationship between two specific cognitive factors, namely appearance orientation (seeing the self as an aesthetic object) and appearance evaluation (negative appraisal of internal body image), on levels of BDD severity. A convenience sample of 304 Australian residents (72.4% females) completed online self-report measures; 53% reported clinical or subclinical levels of BDD. Attachment anxiety and self-ambivalence were both associated with BDD severity, as were both cognitive factors. The direct effect of attachment anxiety was no longer significant after controlling for self-ambivalence, appearance orientation and evaluation. However, significant specific indirect effects were found suggesting that individuals who report greater levels of insecure attachment and self-ambivalence exhibit greater appearance orientation and negative appearance evaluation which, in turn, results in higher levels of BDD. The indirect effect through self-ambivalence was strongest suggesting a central role of self in the relationship between attachment anxiety and BDD severity. The current research demonstrates the importance of attachment anxiety and self-ambivalence in the context of BDD and implicates their potential role in treatment; however, further clinical studies are needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩展身体变形障碍的认知行为模型:依恋焦虑和自我矛盾的作用
本研究旨在通过探索不安全依恋和自我矛盾对两个特定认知因素(即外表取向(将自我视为审美对象)和外表评价(对内部身体形象的负面评价))在BDD严重程度上的关系的作用,来扩展身体变形障碍(BDD)的认知行为模型。304名澳大利亚居民(72.4%为女性)的便利样本完成了在线自我报告测量;53%的患者报告了BDD的临床或亚临床水平。依恋焦虑和自我矛盾都与BDD的严重程度有关,认知因素也是如此。在控制了自我矛盾、外表取向和评价后,依恋焦虑的直接影响不再显著。然而,发现了显著的特定间接影响,这表明报告更高程度的不安全依恋和自我矛盾的个体表现出更大的外表取向和负面的外表评价,这反过来又导致更高水平的BDD。通过自我矛盾心理产生的间接影响最强,表明自我在依恋焦虑和BDD严重程度之间的关系中发挥着核心作用。目前的研究证明了依恋焦虑和自我矛盾在BDD中的重要性,并暗示了它们在治疗中的潜在作用;然而,还需要进一步的临床研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1