Bilingual English Teachers' Perspectives on 'English-only' Policies in an EFL Setting

Zeynep Gülşah Kani, Hatice İğsen
{"title":"Bilingual English Teachers' Perspectives on 'English-only' Policies in an EFL Setting","authors":"Zeynep Gülşah Kani, Hatice İğsen","doi":"10.29329/epasr.2022.248.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various language policies are implemented for foreign language teaching in educational institutions. One of these language policies is the monolingual approach called \"English-only\", which requires only the target language to be used in the classroom. This policy is largely implemented in private institutions in Turkey. Studies about teachers’ perspectives on the English-only policy are relatively less. Hence, this research aimed to explore what the perspectives of bilingual EFL teachers working in schools where the English only policy is implemented are and what the effects of such practices are on their teaching methods and professional identities. A case study research design under a qualitative approach was adopted to explore eight bilingual EFL teachers’ perspectives on language policies implemented in kindergarten and primary school of the private education institution where they worked. The results varied according to the professional background of the teachers and the department they worked. While language teachers who worked in kindergarten favoured the policy despite reacting negatively to the strict policies implemented by the school, primary school language teachers showed explicit resistance to the implementation of the English-only policy. Moreover, all the teachers expressed their uneasiness about being assigned fake English names and associated this with the impact of neoliberalism and other ideologies prevailing in the linguistic market on private institutions in Turkey.","PeriodicalId":30135,"journal":{"name":"Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29329/epasr.2022.248.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Various language policies are implemented for foreign language teaching in educational institutions. One of these language policies is the monolingual approach called "English-only", which requires only the target language to be used in the classroom. This policy is largely implemented in private institutions in Turkey. Studies about teachers’ perspectives on the English-only policy are relatively less. Hence, this research aimed to explore what the perspectives of bilingual EFL teachers working in schools where the English only policy is implemented are and what the effects of such practices are on their teaching methods and professional identities. A case study research design under a qualitative approach was adopted to explore eight bilingual EFL teachers’ perspectives on language policies implemented in kindergarten and primary school of the private education institution where they worked. The results varied according to the professional background of the teachers and the department they worked. While language teachers who worked in kindergarten favoured the policy despite reacting negatively to the strict policies implemented by the school, primary school language teachers showed explicit resistance to the implementation of the English-only policy. Moreover, all the teachers expressed their uneasiness about being assigned fake English names and associated this with the impact of neoliberalism and other ideologies prevailing in the linguistic market on private institutions in Turkey.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双语英语教师对外语环境下“纯英语”政策的看法
教育机构的外语教学实行各种语言政策。其中一项语言政策是被称为“仅英语”的单语教学法,它只要求在课堂上使用目标语言。这项政策主要在土耳其的私人机构实施。关于教师对纯英语政策的看法的研究相对较少。因此,本研究旨在探讨在实行纯英语政策的学校工作的双语EFL教师的观点,以及这种做法对他们的教学方法和职业身份的影响。采用案例研究设计,采用定性方法,探讨八名双语EFL教师对其工作的私立教育机构幼儿园和小学实施的语言政策的看法。结果因教师的专业背景和所在部门而异。虽然在幼儿园工作的语言教师对学校实施的严格政策反应消极,但他们还是支持这项政策,而小学语言教师则对实施纯英语政策表现出明显的抵制。此外,所有教师都对被分配假英文名字表示不安,并将其与语言市场上流行的新自由主义和其他意识形态对土耳其私立机构的影响联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Online teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic: Turkish student teacher and teacher experiences from biology and preschool education fields Teacher Candidates' Understanding and Appraoches to Errors About Matrices Effectiveness of School Readiness Programs for Preschool Children: A Meta-Analysis Study An Evaluation of Integrated Approach for Developing Laboratory Application Skills of Physics Pre-Service Teachers The Mediating Role of School Satisfaction in the Relationship between Positive Experiences at School and School Attachment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1