The Continuous Recombination of Codification and Personalisation KM strategies: A Retrospective Study

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.34190/EJKM.18.02.008
E. Bolisani, Antonella Padova, E. Scarso
{"title":"The Continuous Recombination of Codification and\n Personalisation KM strategies: A Retrospective Study","authors":"E. Bolisani, Antonella Padova, E. Scarso","doi":"10.34190/EJKM.18.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is increasingly considered important to understand how companies plan their Knowledge Management (KM) strategy. The literature provides evidence that there may be different possible approaches to KM strategy. A significant distinction has been made between “codification” and “personalization”. Sometimes, these two approaches have been seen to be alternative to one another. In other cases scholars argued that a company can follow a strategy that mixes the two approaches depending on diverse intertwined factors. Still, on this topic, the literature provides various and sometimes contrasting results that need clarification and confirmation. Especially, there is the need to understand if changes in internal and external conditions may induce modifications in a firm’s KM strategy.The goal of the study is to analyse how the mix of codification and personalisation can vary over time in the same company, due to changing organizational and environmental conditions. With this purpose, the evolution of KM initiatives of a multinational company was investigated. The findings of the study confirm that the strategic mix can change over the years due to modifications in the factors of the company’s internal and external context. Furthermore, the case shows that the different factors have different weight and play a different role in influencing such changes. Specifically, in the investigated case, the factors related to the competitive context affected the evolution of the KM strategy more significantly than internal factors (which were just enablers or constraints of the evolutionary path). In addition, the study shows that this classic distinction between codification and personalization may not be easy to use in practical terms, due to the complexity of KM activities and needs in a company: this point can represent a fresh start of a future research agenda.","PeriodicalId":37211,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/EJKM.18.02.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

It is increasingly considered important to understand how companies plan their Knowledge Management (KM) strategy. The literature provides evidence that there may be different possible approaches to KM strategy. A significant distinction has been made between “codification” and “personalization”. Sometimes, these two approaches have been seen to be alternative to one another. In other cases scholars argued that a company can follow a strategy that mixes the two approaches depending on diverse intertwined factors. Still, on this topic, the literature provides various and sometimes contrasting results that need clarification and confirmation. Especially, there is the need to understand if changes in internal and external conditions may induce modifications in a firm’s KM strategy.The goal of the study is to analyse how the mix of codification and personalisation can vary over time in the same company, due to changing organizational and environmental conditions. With this purpose, the evolution of KM initiatives of a multinational company was investigated. The findings of the study confirm that the strategic mix can change over the years due to modifications in the factors of the company’s internal and external context. Furthermore, the case shows that the different factors have different weight and play a different role in influencing such changes. Specifically, in the investigated case, the factors related to the competitive context affected the evolution of the KM strategy more significantly than internal factors (which were just enablers or constraints of the evolutionary path). In addition, the study shows that this classic distinction between codification and personalization may not be easy to use in practical terms, due to the complexity of KM activities and needs in a company: this point can represent a fresh start of a future research agenda.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
编目与个性化知识管理策略的持续重组:回顾性研究
了解企业如何规划其知识管理(KM)战略越来越被认为是重要的。文献提供的证据表明,可能有不同的方法可能的知识管理策略。在“法典化”和“个人化”之间作出了重大区分。有时,这两种方法被认为是相互替代的。在其他情况下,学者们认为,一家公司可以根据各种相互交织的因素,采用混合这两种方法的战略。尽管如此,在这个话题上,文献提供了各种各样的,有时是对比的结果,需要澄清和确认。特别是,有必要了解内部和外部条件的变化是否会导致企业知识管理战略的修改。该研究的目的是分析在同一家公司中,由于组织和环境条件的变化,规范化和个性化的组合如何随着时间的推移而变化。为此,对一家跨国公司的知识管理活动的演变进行了研究。研究结果证实,由于公司内部和外部环境因素的变化,战略组合会随着时间的推移而发生变化。此外,案例还表明,不同的因素在影响这种变化时具有不同的权重和作用。具体而言,在研究案例中,与竞争环境相关的因素比内部因素(内部因素只是进化路径的推动者或约束因素)更显著地影响了知识管理战略的进化。此外,该研究表明,由于企业知识管理活动和需求的复杂性,在实际应用中,编纂和个性化之间的这种经典区别可能不容易使用:这一点可以代表未来研究议程的新起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management
Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
The KLC Cultures' Synergy Power, Trust, and Tacit Knowledge for Organizational Intelligence Impact of Human Resource Information System Performance for Sustainable Health Sector in South Africa EJKM Editorial: 2024 State of the Journal A Systematic Literature Review on University Collaboration in Open Innovation: Trends, Technologies, and Frameworks Critical Aspects of a Higher Education Reform for Continuous Lifelong Learning Opportunities in a Digital Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1