‘Lives over profits! Bread not bullets!’: A people’s coalition for good governance in South Africa’s state of disaster

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of Civil Society Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17448689.2023.2206151
Sokfa F John, B. Mubangizi
{"title":"‘Lives over profits! Bread not bullets!’: A people’s coalition for good governance in South Africa’s state of disaster","authors":"Sokfa F John, B. Mubangizi","doi":"10.1080/17448689.2023.2206151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT While the COVID-19 pandemic and state response negatively impact government and society alike, the need for public accountability and responsiveness, and the role of civil society in ensuring this has not declined. This article examines how the Covid-19 People’s Coalition in South Africa navigated lockdown restrictions to mobilize civil society for participation in governance by demanding effective, just, transparent and responsive COVID-19 policy and practice. Based on analysis of over 40 public statements, the article shows a predominantly negative sentiment in the Covid-19 Coalition’s reaction to South Africa’s COVID-19 response. Government response was primarily assessed as inadequate, exclusive, anti-poor and vulnerable, violent, and prioritizing socioeconomic concerns that are removed from the realities of the masses. The Coalition offers an example of innovative, people-centered, contextual and bottom-up approach to civil participation. It spoke for the vulnerable and demanded accountable leadership, while highlighting longstanding challenges that have not been effectively addressed. Overlooking such problems undermines the government's ability to tackle crises and achieve good governance. It is recommended that the Coalition balances its criticism with more hands-on and constructive approaches such as exploring avenues for collaboration with government to achieve desired change.","PeriodicalId":46013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2023.2206151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT While the COVID-19 pandemic and state response negatively impact government and society alike, the need for public accountability and responsiveness, and the role of civil society in ensuring this has not declined. This article examines how the Covid-19 People’s Coalition in South Africa navigated lockdown restrictions to mobilize civil society for participation in governance by demanding effective, just, transparent and responsive COVID-19 policy and practice. Based on analysis of over 40 public statements, the article shows a predominantly negative sentiment in the Covid-19 Coalition’s reaction to South Africa’s COVID-19 response. Government response was primarily assessed as inadequate, exclusive, anti-poor and vulnerable, violent, and prioritizing socioeconomic concerns that are removed from the realities of the masses. The Coalition offers an example of innovative, people-centered, contextual and bottom-up approach to civil participation. It spoke for the vulnerable and demanded accountable leadership, while highlighting longstanding challenges that have not been effectively addressed. Overlooking such problems undermines the government's ability to tackle crises and achieve good governance. It is recommended that the Coalition balances its criticism with more hands-on and constructive approaches such as exploring avenues for collaboration with government to achieve desired change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“生命重于利益!”面包不是子弹!:在南非的灾难状态下,一个人民的善治联盟
虽然COVID-19大流行和国家应对措施对政府和社会都产生了负面影响,但对公共问责制和响应能力的需求,以及民间社会在确保这一点方面的作用并未减弱。本文考察了南非的Covid-19人民联盟如何通过要求有效、公正、透明和反应迅速的Covid-19政策和做法,克服封锁限制,动员民间社会参与治理。根据对40多个公开声明的分析,这篇文章显示,新冠肺炎联盟对南非应对新冠肺炎的反应主要是负面情绪。政府的反应主要被评估为不充分、排外、反穷人和弱势群体、暴力、优先考虑脱离群众现实的社会经济问题。该联盟为公民参与提供了创新的、以人为本的、切合实际的、自下而上的方法。它为弱势群体发声,要求负责任的领导,同时强调了尚未得到有效解决的长期挑战。忽视这些问题会削弱政府处理危机和实现良好治理的能力。建议联合政府以更实际和建设性的方法来平衡其批评,例如探索与政府合作的途径,以实现期望的变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Civil Society
Journal of Civil Society POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Civil society and governance. A survey of local authority and NPO collaboration from an institutional perspective Enabling role of civil society organizations (CSOs) in local environmental management in the Philippines: A systematic review Claiming space in civil society. Young Muslim moral personhoods in Bangladesh and Italy Advocating for human rights of LGBTIQ+ persons in multilevel governance systems Contextual factors influencing voluntary organizations’ inclusiveness and individual participation in leisure activities: The Case of Norway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1