Revisiting source versus sink limitations of wheat yield during grain filling

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agronomy Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1002/agj2.21454
Adolfo Rosati, Paolo Benincasa
{"title":"Revisiting source versus sink limitations of wheat yield during grain filling","authors":"Adolfo Rosati,&nbsp;Paolo Benincasa","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To further increase wheat (<i>Triticum</i> spp.) yield, we need to understand whether it is source or sink limited. Earlier papers suggested that wheat yield is source limited in modern cultivars, including during the grain-filling stage. Many recent papers support this interpretation, showing that yield is strongly related to environmental conditions that affect source capacity. In contrast to this, other authors working on source–sink manipulations have concluded that wheat yield is only or predominantly sink limited during grain filling. The objective of this forum paper was to examine this contrasting literature and revisit the assumptions and the interpretation of the results. We found that the arguments for a major sink limitation to wheat yield during grain filling arose from a common approach to quantitatively assess the degree of source–sink limitations, based on relativizing the change in grain weight (in response to source–sink manipulations) to the estimated change in source availability per grain. We show that the estimated changes in source availability with source manipulations are often overestimated in the literature, thus underestimating source limitations. Most importantly, we discuss why relativizing the change in grain weight to the estimated change in source availability biases the interpretation of source versus sink limitations. We conclude that wheat yield is mostly source limited during grain filling, and thus strongly dependent on environmental (including agronomic) conditions. A new model to interpret wheat yield limitations is proposed, describing yield as source limited during the whole crop cycle, including during grain filling.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"115 6","pages":"3197-3205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21454","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21454","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To further increase wheat (Triticum spp.) yield, we need to understand whether it is source or sink limited. Earlier papers suggested that wheat yield is source limited in modern cultivars, including during the grain-filling stage. Many recent papers support this interpretation, showing that yield is strongly related to environmental conditions that affect source capacity. In contrast to this, other authors working on source–sink manipulations have concluded that wheat yield is only or predominantly sink limited during grain filling. The objective of this forum paper was to examine this contrasting literature and revisit the assumptions and the interpretation of the results. We found that the arguments for a major sink limitation to wheat yield during grain filling arose from a common approach to quantitatively assess the degree of source–sink limitations, based on relativizing the change in grain weight (in response to source–sink manipulations) to the estimated change in source availability per grain. We show that the estimated changes in source availability with source manipulations are often overestimated in the literature, thus underestimating source limitations. Most importantly, we discuss why relativizing the change in grain weight to the estimated change in source availability biases the interpretation of source versus sink limitations. We conclude that wheat yield is mostly source limited during grain filling, and thus strongly dependent on environmental (including agronomic) conditions. A new model to interpret wheat yield limitations is proposed, describing yield as source limited during the whole crop cycle, including during grain filling.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小麦灌浆期产量源库限制的修正
为了进一步提高小麦(Triticum spp.)产量,我们需要了解它是源限制还是库限制。早期的研究表明,现代小麦品种的产量受到来源限制,包括在灌浆阶段。最近的许多论文支持这一解释,表明产量与影响源容量的环境条件密切相关。与此相反,其他研究源库操纵的作者得出结论,小麦产量仅或主要是在灌浆期间受到源库限制。这篇论坛论文的目的是回顾这些对比文献,并重新审视假设和结果的解释。我们发现,在灌浆期间,对小麦产量的主要汇限制的争论源于一种定量评估源库限制程度的常用方法,该方法基于将籽粒重的变化(作为对源库操作的响应)与每粒源可用性的估计变化相对化。我们表明,在文献中,估计的源可用性变化与源操作经常被高估,从而低估了源限制。最重要的是,我们讨论了为什么将颗粒重量的变化与源可用性的估计变化相对化会对源与汇限制的解释产生偏差。我们得出结论,小麦产量在灌浆期间主要受来源限制,因此强烈依赖于环境(包括农艺)条件。提出了一个解释小麦产量限制的新模型,将产量描述为整个作物周期(包括灌浆期)的来源限制。这篇文章受版权保护。版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Weed management in organic dryland wheat production in the Pacific Northwest Soil health benefits of compost persist two decades after single application to winter wheat Deriving general principles of agroecosystem multifunctionality with the Diverse Rotations Improve Valuable Ecosystem Services (DRIVES) network Multiyear productivity and nitrate-nitrogen loss from corn and prairie bioenergy cropping systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1