Policy learning and the COVID-19 crisis: A systematic review of scholarship and key lessons for research and practice

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Australian Journal of Public Administration Pub Date : 2023-07-21 DOI:10.1111/1467-8500.12598
Bishoy L. Zaki, Ellen Wayenberg
{"title":"Policy learning and the COVID-19 crisis: A systematic review of scholarship and key lessons for research and practice","authors":"Bishoy L. Zaki,&nbsp;Ellen Wayenberg","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Policy learning plays an important role during crises, where it can empower effective crisis responses or derail policy . Accordingly, a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic has created a surge in research on policy learning. In this article, and more than 3 years from the crisis’ onset, we systematically review what COVID-19 policy learning research has hitherto offered. We take stock of 45 scientific articles to provide an account of where policy learning has been researched, what methods, policy domains, and conceptual approaches were most used, and what new theoretical and conceptual advances have emerged from this growing body of research. Furthermore, we distil the key insights it offers to both scholars and practitioners. In doing so, we point to the theoretical and empirical gaps that future scholarship can address, as well as how can practitioners leverage research insights towards improving policy learning practices during similar crises in the future.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Points for practitioners</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>In creeping crises such as COVID-19, policy-makers need to consider the multidimensionality and societal embeddedness of policy issues while designing policy learning processes, particularly in identifying relevant expertise.</li>\n \n <li>Creeping crises evolve over time. Hence, policy-makers need to continuously re-align the policy learning processes to match evolving crisis definitions, manifestations, and societal perceptions. This requires continuous context scanning.</li>\n \n <li>In creeping crises, policy learning has considerable time and space interactions. Thus, when designing policy learning processes, policy-makers need to proactively consider the heterogeneity of policy learning processes across various levels of the governance architecture over time. As such, holistic ‘governance’ of policy learning processes becomes essential.</li>\n \n <li>Policy-makers should strive towards minimising perceived political interventions and influences on the policy learning processes, particularly during crises to maintain transparency and public trust.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":"83 3","pages":"415-432"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8500.12598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policy learning plays an important role during crises, where it can empower effective crisis responses or derail policy . Accordingly, a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic has created a surge in research on policy learning. In this article, and more than 3 years from the crisis’ onset, we systematically review what COVID-19 policy learning research has hitherto offered. We take stock of 45 scientific articles to provide an account of where policy learning has been researched, what methods, policy domains, and conceptual approaches were most used, and what new theoretical and conceptual advances have emerged from this growing body of research. Furthermore, we distil the key insights it offers to both scholars and practitioners. In doing so, we point to the theoretical and empirical gaps that future scholarship can address, as well as how can practitioners leverage research insights towards improving policy learning practices during similar crises in the future.

Points for practitioners

  • In creeping crises such as COVID-19, policy-makers need to consider the multidimensionality and societal embeddedness of policy issues while designing policy learning processes, particularly in identifying relevant expertise.
  • Creeping crises evolve over time. Hence, policy-makers need to continuously re-align the policy learning processes to match evolving crisis definitions, manifestations, and societal perceptions. This requires continuous context scanning.
  • In creeping crises, policy learning has considerable time and space interactions. Thus, when designing policy learning processes, policy-makers need to proactively consider the heterogeneity of policy learning processes across various levels of the governance architecture over time. As such, holistic ‘governance’ of policy learning processes becomes essential.
  • Policy-makers should strive towards minimising perceived political interventions and influences on the policy learning processes, particularly during crises to maintain transparency and public trust.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政策学习与COVID - 19危机:对学术研究和研究与实践的关键教训的系统回顾
政策学习在危机期间发挥着重要作用,它可以增强有效应对危机的能力,也可以破坏政策。因此,像 COVID-19 大流行这样的危机掀起了政策学习研究的热潮。在本文中,我们系统地回顾了危机爆发三年多以来 COVID-19 政策学习研究的成果。我们对 45 篇科学论文进行了盘点,介绍了政策学习的研究领域、最常用的方法、政策领域和概念方法,以及从这一不断增长的研究中产生了哪些新的理论和概念进展。此外,我们还提炼了这些研究为学者和实践者提供的重要启示。在此过程中,我们指出了未来学术研究可以弥补的理论和经验差距,以及实践者在未来类似危机中如何利用研究见解来改进政策学习实践。 为实践者提供的要点 在 COVID-19 等蠕变危机中,政策制定者在设计政策学习过程时,尤其是在确定相关专业知识时,需要考虑政策问题的多维性和社会嵌入性。 蠕变危机会随着时间的推移而演变。因此,政策制定者需要不断重新调整政策学习过程,以适应不断变化的危机定义、表现形式和社会观念。这就需要不断进行背景扫描。 在蠕变危机中,政策学习在时间和空间上都会产生相当大的相互作用。因此,在设计政策学习过程时,决策者需要积极主动地考虑随着时间的推移,各级治理架构中政策学习过程的异质性。因此,政策学习过程的整体 "治理 "变得至关重要。 决策者应努力尽量减少对政策学习过程的政治干预和影响,尤其是在危机期间,以保持透明度和公众信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - TOC Issue Information - TOC Knowledge brokering for public sector reform ‘We're trying to get out of here, that's what we're doing’: A Bourdieusian examination of ‘choice’ in the National Disability Insurance Scheme Knowing what not to know: Unravelling the dynamics of selective knowledge in government policymaking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1