Achieving Ambitious Positions in Multilateral Chemicals Negotiations: How does the European Union influence the Negotiation Outcomes?

IF 1.1 Q2 AREA STUDIES Journal of Contemporary European Research Pub Date : 2022-08-18 DOI:10.30950/jcer.v18i1.1203
F. Ohler
{"title":"Achieving Ambitious Positions in Multilateral Chemicals Negotiations: How does the European Union influence the Negotiation Outcomes?","authors":"F. Ohler","doi":"10.30950/jcer.v18i1.1203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explains the influence of the European Union (EU) in multilateral chemicals negotiations. Focusing on the Basel Convention, this paper studies two issues negotiated at the Conference of the Parties 2019. Comparing a success and a failure case for the EU, it provides explanations for the EU’s high influence in the negotiations on the management of plastic waste and its low influence in the negotiations on low Persistent Organic Pollutant content values. Using process-tracing, the paper maps the EU’s diplomatic activities from the EU’s initial position to the outcome of the negotiations. Two separate causal mechanisms outline the differences between the success and the failure of the EU. Data is collected through interviews, observations and official documents. The paper shows the crucial role of the EU’s diplomatic activities in multilateral negotiations. The EU can be influential, if it strongly engages in all negotiation forums, is able to adapt its position during the course of negotiations and can propose a compromise acceptable to all parties. It is however uninfluential, if it downscales its diplomatic activities and refuses to compromise.","PeriodicalId":44985,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary European Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v18i1.1203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explains the influence of the European Union (EU) in multilateral chemicals negotiations. Focusing on the Basel Convention, this paper studies two issues negotiated at the Conference of the Parties 2019. Comparing a success and a failure case for the EU, it provides explanations for the EU’s high influence in the negotiations on the management of plastic waste and its low influence in the negotiations on low Persistent Organic Pollutant content values. Using process-tracing, the paper maps the EU’s diplomatic activities from the EU’s initial position to the outcome of the negotiations. Two separate causal mechanisms outline the differences between the success and the failure of the EU. Data is collected through interviews, observations and official documents. The paper shows the crucial role of the EU’s diplomatic activities in multilateral negotiations. The EU can be influential, if it strongly engages in all negotiation forums, is able to adapt its position during the course of negotiations and can propose a compromise acceptable to all parties. It is however uninfluential, if it downscales its diplomatic activities and refuses to compromise.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在多边化学品谈判中实现雄心勃勃的立场:欧盟如何影响谈判结果?
本文阐述了欧盟在多边化学品谈判中的影响。本文以《巴塞尔公约》为中心,研究了2019年缔约方大会上谈判的两个问题。通过比较欧盟的成功和失败案例,它解释了欧盟在塑料废物管理谈判中的高影响力和在低持久性有机污染物含量谈判中的低影响力。利用过程追踪,该文件绘制了从欧盟最初立场到谈判结果的欧盟外交活动图。两个独立的因果机制概述了欧盟成功与失败之间的差异。数据是通过访谈、观察和官方文件收集的。该文件显示了欧盟外交活动在多边谈判中的关键作用。如果欧盟积极参与所有谈判论坛,能够在谈判过程中调整立场,并能够提出各方都能接受的妥协方案,那么它就可以发挥影响力。然而,如果它缩减外交活动并拒绝妥协,它就不会受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Decolonising EU Trade Relations with the Global Souths? Disrupting and Re-imagining European Studies: towards a More Diverse and Inclusive Discipline Moving from EU-centrisms: Lessons from the Polycrisis for EU studies and Global South Regionalism Rethinking African-European Scientific Cooperation: The Case of the Platform for African-European Studies Unlearning and Relearning Europe: Theoretical and Practical Approaches to Decolonising European Studies Curricula
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1