Later emergency provider shift hour is associated with increased risk of admission: a retrospective cohort study

P. Tyler, Alan Fossa, J. Joseph, L. Sanchez
{"title":"Later emergency provider shift hour is associated with increased risk of admission: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"P. Tyler, Alan Fossa, J. Joseph, L. Sanchez","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Understanding factors that drive admissions is critical to containing cost and optimising hospital operations. We hypothesised that, due to multiple factors, emergency physicians would be more likely to admit a patient seen later in their shift. Methods Retrospective study examining all patient visits at a large academic hospital from July 2010 to July 2016. Patients with missing data (n=191) were excluded. 294 031 emergency department (ED) visits were included in the final analysis. The exposure of interest was the time during the shift at which a patient was first evaluated by the clinician, and outcome was hospital admission. We used a generalised estimating equation with physician as the clustering level to adjust for patient age, gender, Emergency Severity Index (ESI, 1=most severe illness, 5=least severe illness) and 24 hours clock time. We also conducted a stratified analysis by three ESI categories. Results From the 294 031 ED visits, 5977 were seen in the last hour of the shift. Of patients seen in the last shift hour, 43% were admitted versus 39% seen at any other time during the shift. There was a significant association between being evaluated in the last hour (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06) and last quarter (RR 1.02, 1.01 to 1.03) of shift and the likelihood of admission. Patients with an ESI Score of 4–5 saw the largest effect sizes (RR 1.62, 0.996–2.635 for last hour and RR 1.24, 0.996–1.535 for last quarter) but these were not statistically significant. Additionally, there was a trend towards increased likelihood of admission later in shift; the relative risk of admission was 1.04 in hour 6, (1.02–1.05), 1.03 in hour 7 (1.01–1.05), 1.04 in hour 8 (1.01–1.06) and 1.06 in hour 9 (1.013–1.101). Conclusions There is a small but significant association between a patient being evaluated later in an emergency physician’s shift and their likelihood of being admitted to the hospital.","PeriodicalId":49653,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","volume":"29 1","pages":"465 - 471"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009546","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background Understanding factors that drive admissions is critical to containing cost and optimising hospital operations. We hypothesised that, due to multiple factors, emergency physicians would be more likely to admit a patient seen later in their shift. Methods Retrospective study examining all patient visits at a large academic hospital from July 2010 to July 2016. Patients with missing data (n=191) were excluded. 294 031 emergency department (ED) visits were included in the final analysis. The exposure of interest was the time during the shift at which a patient was first evaluated by the clinician, and outcome was hospital admission. We used a generalised estimating equation with physician as the clustering level to adjust for patient age, gender, Emergency Severity Index (ESI, 1=most severe illness, 5=least severe illness) and 24 hours clock time. We also conducted a stratified analysis by three ESI categories. Results From the 294 031 ED visits, 5977 were seen in the last hour of the shift. Of patients seen in the last shift hour, 43% were admitted versus 39% seen at any other time during the shift. There was a significant association between being evaluated in the last hour (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06) and last quarter (RR 1.02, 1.01 to 1.03) of shift and the likelihood of admission. Patients with an ESI Score of 4–5 saw the largest effect sizes (RR 1.62, 0.996–2.635 for last hour and RR 1.24, 0.996–1.535 for last quarter) but these were not statistically significant. Additionally, there was a trend towards increased likelihood of admission later in shift; the relative risk of admission was 1.04 in hour 6, (1.02–1.05), 1.03 in hour 7 (1.01–1.05), 1.04 in hour 8 (1.01–1.06) and 1.06 in hour 9 (1.013–1.101). Conclusions There is a small but significant association between a patient being evaluated later in an emergency physician’s shift and their likelihood of being admitted to the hospital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
较晚的急救人员轮班时间与入院风险增加有关:一项回顾性队列研究
背景了解驱动入院的因素对于控制成本和优化医院运营至关重要。我们假设,由于多种因素,急诊医生更有可能在他们轮班的晚些时候接收病人。方法回顾性分析2010年7月至2016年7月在某大型学术医院就诊的所有患者。排除资料缺失的患者(n=191)。最终分析包括294031次急诊科(ED)就诊。感兴趣的暴露是指轮班期间临床医生首次对患者进行评估的时间,结果是住院。我们使用以医生为聚类水平的广义估计方程来调整患者年龄、性别、紧急严重程度指数(ESI, 1=最严重疾病,5=最不严重疾病)和24小时时钟时间。我们还对ESI的三个类别进行了分层分析。结果294931例急诊科就诊中,5977例在换班前1小时就诊。在最后一个轮班时间就诊的患者中,43%的患者入院,而39%的患者在轮班期间的任何其他时间就诊。在移位的最后一个小时(RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01至1.06)和最后一个季度(RR 1.02, 1.01至1.03)进行评估与入院可能性之间存在显著关联。ESI评分为4-5的患者效应量最大(最后一小时的RR为1.62,0.996-2.635,最后一个季度的RR为1.24,0.996-1.535),但这些效应量没有统计学意义。此外,轮班后入院的可能性有增加的趋势;入院相对危险度分别为:第6小时1.04、1.02 ~ 1.05、第7小时1.03(1.01 ~ 1.05)、第8小时1.04(1.01 ~ 1.06)、第9小时1.06(1.013 ~ 1.101)。结论:在急诊医生轮班后接受评估的患者与其住院的可能性之间存在虽小但显著的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality & Safety in Health Care
Quality & Safety in Health Care 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of telephone triage for predicting adverse outcomes in suspected COVID-19: an observational cohort study. Quality framework for remote antenatal care: qualitative study with women, healthcare professionals and system-level stakeholders. Addressing social determinants of health in primary care: a quasi-experimental study using unannounced standardised patients to evaluate the impact of audit/feedback on physicians' rates of identifying and responding to social needs. Reporting on implementation trials with null findings: the need for concurrent process evaluation reporting. Antibiotic documentation: death by a thousand clicks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1