Fieldwork through the Zoomiverse

R. Vokes, G. Atukunda
{"title":"Fieldwork through the Zoomiverse","authors":"R. Vokes, G. Atukunda","doi":"10.3167/aia.2021.280114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have been conducting collaborative ethnographic research together for over 20 years Over the past 12 months, this collaboration has included face-to-face encounters, both in Kampala, Uganda, and in Perth, Australia However, since the advent of COVID-19-related ‘lockdowns’ in our respective countries, our engagements have been conducted exclusively over online platforms, including WhatsApp, Facebook and – increasingly – Zoom In this article, we reflect upon our shared experience of conducting ethnography through this platform as a tool for understanding the effects of the pandemic in Uganda We argue that, despite all kinds of material constraints (at both ends), Zoom has much to offer the ethnographer particularly because it can generate an intimate understanding of experience and time However, against this advantage, some aspects of social life remain beyond the range of its channels, for which an assemblage of additional methods are required We finish by reflecting upon what these methods have contributed to our long-term study of emergent cultures of mobility in Uganda – a study which is now being conducted in an ostensible context of immobility © The Author(s)","PeriodicalId":43493,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology in Action-Journal for Applied Anthropology in Policy and Practice","volume":"28 1","pages":"73-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology in Action-Journal for Applied Anthropology in Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2021.280114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We have been conducting collaborative ethnographic research together for over 20 years Over the past 12 months, this collaboration has included face-to-face encounters, both in Kampala, Uganda, and in Perth, Australia However, since the advent of COVID-19-related ‘lockdowns’ in our respective countries, our engagements have been conducted exclusively over online platforms, including WhatsApp, Facebook and – increasingly – Zoom In this article, we reflect upon our shared experience of conducting ethnography through this platform as a tool for understanding the effects of the pandemic in Uganda We argue that, despite all kinds of material constraints (at both ends), Zoom has much to offer the ethnographer particularly because it can generate an intimate understanding of experience and time However, against this advantage, some aspects of social life remain beyond the range of its channels, for which an assemblage of additional methods are required We finish by reflecting upon what these methods have contributed to our long-term study of emergent cultures of mobility in Uganda – a study which is now being conducted in an ostensible context of immobility © The Author(s)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过Zoomiverse进行实地考察
20多年来,我们一直在共同开展民族志合作研究。在过去的12个月里,这种合作包括在乌干达坎帕拉和澳大利亚珀斯的面对面交流。然而,自从我们各自国家出现与新冠肺炎相关的“封锁”以来,我们的互动仅通过在线平台进行,包括WhatsApp、,脸书和越来越多的Zoom在这篇文章中,我们反思了我们通过这个平台进行民族志研究的共同经验,将其作为了解乌干达疫情影响的工具。我们认为,尽管存在各种物质限制(两端),Zoom为民族志学家提供了很多东西,特别是因为它可以对经验和时间产生深入的理解。然而,尽管有这样的优势,社会生活的某些方面仍然超出了它的渠道范围,为此,我们需要一系列额外的方法。最后,我们反思了这些方法对我们对乌干达新兴流动文化的长期研究做出了哪些贡献——这项研究现在是在表面上不动的背景下进行的©作者
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Anthropology in Action (AIA) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing articles, commentaries, research reports, and book reviews in applied anthropology. Contributions reflect the use of anthropological training in policy- or practice-oriented work and foster the broader application of these approaches to practical problems. The journal provides a forum for debate and analysis for anthropologists working both inside and outside academia and aims to promote communication amongst practitioners, academics and students of anthropology in order to advance the cross-fertilisation of expertise and ideas. Recent themes and articles have included the anthropology of welfare, transferring anthropological skills to applied health research, design considerations in old-age living, museum-based anthropology education, cultural identities and British citizenship, feminism and anthropology, and international student and youth mobility.
期刊最新文献
Marginalised People's Access to Publicly Funded Abortion in Catalunya Doing Ethnography Blind ‘Anthropological Enough?’ The Role of Anthropology in India's Public Health Affective Cartographies of Collective Blame
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1