The Nonintercalated Lunar Calendar of the Middle Assyrian Period

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Cuneiform Studies Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.5615/jcunestud.69.2017.0151
Joshua J. Jeffers
{"title":"The Nonintercalated Lunar Calendar of the Middle Assyrian Period","authors":"Joshua J. Jeffers","doi":"10.5615/jcunestud.69.2017.0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars generally assume that Assyria employed a luni-solar calendrical system during the Middle Assyrian period—akin to the one used in Babylonia—that kept the months of its year synchronized with the seasons of the solar year through periodic intercalation. With this understanding, the regnal dates assigned to the Middle Assyrian kings have traditionally been expressed in terms of solar years. The present article, however, argues that the Assyrians did not use this type of system. The author draws upon a variety of administrative tablets—primarily from the reigns of Shalmaneser I, Tukultī-Ninurta I, and Tiglath-pileser I—to demonstrate that the months of the Assyrian year were in fact not permanently affixed to particular seasons of the solar year, revealing that its year was not intercalated and was thus perpetually rotating slowly through the solar year. This article also explores how such a calendrical system impacts the Middle Assyrian kings' regnal dates, which would need to be lowered given that the unadjusted Assyrian lunar year was slightly shorter than its solar counterpart.","PeriodicalId":36366,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","volume":"69 1","pages":"151 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5615/jcunestud.69.2017.0151","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cuneiform Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5615/jcunestud.69.2017.0151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Scholars generally assume that Assyria employed a luni-solar calendrical system during the Middle Assyrian period—akin to the one used in Babylonia—that kept the months of its year synchronized with the seasons of the solar year through periodic intercalation. With this understanding, the regnal dates assigned to the Middle Assyrian kings have traditionally been expressed in terms of solar years. The present article, however, argues that the Assyrians did not use this type of system. The author draws upon a variety of administrative tablets—primarily from the reigns of Shalmaneser I, Tukultī-Ninurta I, and Tiglath-pileser I—to demonstrate that the months of the Assyrian year were in fact not permanently affixed to particular seasons of the solar year, revealing that its year was not intercalated and was thus perpetually rotating slowly through the solar year. This article also explores how such a calendrical system impacts the Middle Assyrian kings' regnal dates, which would need to be lowered given that the unadjusted Assyrian lunar year was slightly shorter than its solar counterpart.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中亚述时期的无插入历
学者们普遍认为,亚述在中亚述时期采用了类似于巴比伦的luni太阳日历系统,通过周期性的嵌入使其一年中的月份与太阳年的季节保持同步。根据这一理解,中亚述国王的统治日期传统上以太阳年表示。然而,本文认为亚述人没有使用这种类型的系统。作者利用了各种行政石碑——主要来自Shalmaneser一世、Tukultī-Ninurta一世和Tiglath pileser一世统治时期——来证明亚述年的月份实际上并没有永久地固定在太阳年的特定季节,这表明它的年份没有被插入,因此在太阳年中一直缓慢旋转。这篇文章还探讨了这样的历法系统是如何影响中亚述国王的统治日期的,考虑到未经调整的亚述农历比太阳年略短,因此需要降低统治日期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cuneiform Studies
Journal of Cuneiform Studies Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Old Babylonian Date List with Year Names of Hammurabi A Kassite Exercise Tablet with Omens Concerning the “Yoke” of the Liver The Return of the Text: On Self-Reference in Cuneiform Literature Nebuchadnezzar II’s Palace Overseer (Ša Pān Ekalli) and The Canal of Abundance Building Projects Dur-Abi-ešuh and the Abandonment of Nippur During the Late Old Babylonian Period: A Historical Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1