Comparing regime types – ‘most similar’ cases in East Asia

IF 1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Asian Journal of Comparative Politics Pub Date : 2023-04-19 DOI:10.1177/20578911231164767
Dirk Berg-Schlosser, Ursula Hoffmann-Lange
{"title":"Comparing regime types – ‘most similar’ cases in East Asia","authors":"Dirk Berg-Schlosser, Ursula Hoffmann-Lange","doi":"10.1177/20578911231164767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The People's Republic of China (PRC), the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the Republic of Singapore represent different types of political regimes and provide a fascinating contrast concerning their performance with regard to the global conflict between liberal democracies and autocracies. This paper examines briefly their common historical backgrounds and provides a detailed analysis of common ‘Asian’ cultural features and popular support for democracy on the micro-level. It then systematically assesses their performance concerning liberal democracy and quality, governance scores, and socio-economic development. Finally, the reactions to the Covid-19 pandemic are documented showing again specific regime characteristics. We use most recent V-Dem, World Bank, United Nations Development Programme, World Values Surveys and similar data. The conclusions point to possible international consequences and the crucial position of Taiwan.","PeriodicalId":43694,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Comparative Politics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Comparative Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911231164767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The People's Republic of China (PRC), the Special Administrative Region of Hong Kong, the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the Republic of Singapore represent different types of political regimes and provide a fascinating contrast concerning their performance with regard to the global conflict between liberal democracies and autocracies. This paper examines briefly their common historical backgrounds and provides a detailed analysis of common ‘Asian’ cultural features and popular support for democracy on the micro-level. It then systematically assesses their performance concerning liberal democracy and quality, governance scores, and socio-economic development. Finally, the reactions to the Covid-19 pandemic are documented showing again specific regime characteristics. We use most recent V-Dem, World Bank, United Nations Development Programme, World Values Surveys and similar data. The conclusions point to possible international consequences and the crucial position of Taiwan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较政权类型——东亚“最相似”的案例
中华人民共和国(PRC)、香港特别行政区、中华民国(台湾)和新加坡共和国代表了不同类型的政治政权,并就它们在自由民主国家与专制国家之间的全球冲突中的表现形成了鲜明对比。本文简要考察了他们共同的历史背景,并从微观层面详细分析了共同的“亚洲”文化特征和民众对民主的支持。然后,它系统地评估了他们在自由民主和质量、治理得分和社会经济发展方面的表现。最后,对新冠肺炎大流行的反应再次显示出特定的制度特征。我们使用了最新的V-Dem、世界银行、联合国开发计划署、世界价值观调查和类似数据。结论指出了台湾可能面临的国际后果和关键地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Narratives of democracy: Educated elites’ responses to democratic erosion in Indonesia Labor market dualization or cultural divide?: A comparative analysis of the declining support for center-left parties in Western Europe and Japan Celebrity culture, level of education and trust in media institutions: Empirical evidence from the Philippines Communal violence in Bangladesh: A study of the underlying factors behind the persistent attacks on the non-Muslim communities Cross-cutting exposures on social network sites. The moderating role of national environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1