Does the association between workload and work engagement depend on being workaholic? A cross-cultural study on Italian and Canadian employees

IF 0.6 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI:10.1285/I20705948V13N3P589
Alessandro Lo Presti, Sevag K. Kertechian, Alfonso Landolfi
{"title":"Does the association between workload and work engagement depend on being workaholic? A cross-cultural study on Italian and Canadian employees","authors":"Alessandro Lo Presti, Sevag K. Kertechian, Alfonso Landolfi","doi":"10.1285/I20705948V13N3P589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Work intensification implies increased workload which, in turn, can impact on work engagement, and workaholism; however, their mutual relations have not received adequate scholarly attention up to now. This cross-cultural study, consistently with the Job Demands-Resources model, examined the association between workload and work engagement and verified if workaholism acted as a moderator. Moreover, we examined if cultural differences affected these associations. To this purpose, 416 Canadian and 412 Italian employees filled a cross-sectional questionnaire. The association between workload and work engagement varied significantly between countries, and was moderated by workaholism. Results discussed in view of the theoretical framework provide insights for both scholars and managers in terms of human resource management and job design.","PeriodicalId":44770,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","volume":"13 1","pages":"589-611"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1285/I20705948V13N3P589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Work intensification implies increased workload which, in turn, can impact on work engagement, and workaholism; however, their mutual relations have not received adequate scholarly attention up to now. This cross-cultural study, consistently with the Job Demands-Resources model, examined the association between workload and work engagement and verified if workaholism acted as a moderator. Moreover, we examined if cultural differences affected these associations. To this purpose, 416 Canadian and 412 Italian employees filled a cross-sectional questionnaire. The association between workload and work engagement varied significantly between countries, and was moderated by workaholism. Results discussed in view of the theoretical framework provide insights for both scholars and managers in terms of human resource management and job design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作量和工作投入之间的联系是否取决于是否为工作狂?意大利和加拿大员工的跨文化研究
工作强化意味着工作量增加,这反过来又会影响工作投入和工作狂;然而,它们之间的相互关系至今还没有得到足够的学术关注。这项跨文化研究与工作需求-资源模型一致,考察了工作量和工作投入之间的关系,并验证了工作狂是否起到了调节作用。此外,我们还研究了文化差异是否会影响这些关联。为此,416名加拿大员工和412名意大利员工填写了一份横断面问卷。工作量和工作投入之间的关系在不同国家之间存在显著差异,并且受到工作狂的影响。在理论框架下讨论的结果为学者和管理者在人力资源管理和岗位设计方面提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploratory Data Analysis of Accuracy of US Weather Forecastes Extended asymmetry model based on logit transformation and decomposition of symmetry for square contingency tables with ordered categories Generalized Quasi Lindley Distribution: Theoretical Properties, Estimation Methods, and Applications Almost unbiased ridge estimator in the count data regression models Does the elimination of work flexibility contribute to reducing wage inequality? Empirical evidence from Ecuador
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1