Expectations and Understanding of Learning in Practice: Student Speech and Language Therapists’ and Practice Educators’ Perspectives of Learning

K. Davies, Fiona Kevan, E. Ormerod
{"title":"Expectations and Understanding of Learning in Practice: Student Speech and Language Therapists’ and Practice Educators’ Perspectives of Learning","authors":"K. Davies, Fiona Kevan, E. Ormerod","doi":"10.18552/IJPBLHSC.V7I1.502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in speech and language therapy education has focussed on investigating models of clinical placements, rather than how learning is optimised in practical settings. A distinction has been made in practice-based learning in medical education between ‘capability’ and ‘competency’, urging educators to prioritise learning that enables problem solving and application of theory. We know little about student speech and language therapists’ (SLTs) and educators’ perception and expectations of clinical learning in placement and how this relates to capability. We investigated student SLTs’ and educators’ beliefs and experiences of successful learning in clinical settings and how they perceived their learner/educator roles using a qualitative study. Data was gathered from 28 students and educators using individual interviews and focus groups. The data was investigated using thematic analysis. Educators see their role as facilitators, developing core skills such as clinical reasoning, understanding professional identity and gaining independence. Some educators see this as a co-learning model, creating opportunities for their own learning. Students’ conceptions change during clinical placements, from focussing on their own development to seeking to understand the client’s perspective as well as identify needs, and respond with well-reasoned options for intervention. Aiming to equip SLT learners to be capable professionals, able to apply skills of clinical reasoning, is considered a core skill for SLT educators. Developing models for clinical placements informed by understanding how students learn to become capable could enhance the readiness of student SLTs to enter professional practice.","PeriodicalId":36796,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18552/IJPBLHSC.V7I1.502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research in speech and language therapy education has focussed on investigating models of clinical placements, rather than how learning is optimised in practical settings. A distinction has been made in practice-based learning in medical education between ‘capability’ and ‘competency’, urging educators to prioritise learning that enables problem solving and application of theory. We know little about student speech and language therapists’ (SLTs) and educators’ perception and expectations of clinical learning in placement and how this relates to capability. We investigated student SLTs’ and educators’ beliefs and experiences of successful learning in clinical settings and how they perceived their learner/educator roles using a qualitative study. Data was gathered from 28 students and educators using individual interviews and focus groups. The data was investigated using thematic analysis. Educators see their role as facilitators, developing core skills such as clinical reasoning, understanding professional identity and gaining independence. Some educators see this as a co-learning model, creating opportunities for their own learning. Students’ conceptions change during clinical placements, from focussing on their own development to seeking to understand the client’s perspective as well as identify needs, and respond with well-reasoned options for intervention. Aiming to equip SLT learners to be capable professionals, able to apply skills of clinical reasoning, is considered a core skill for SLT educators. Developing models for clinical placements informed by understanding how students learn to become capable could enhance the readiness of student SLTs to enter professional practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实践中学习的期望与理解:学生语言治疗师与实践教育者的学习视角
言语和语言治疗教育的研究重点是研究临床实习模式,而不是如何在实际环境中优化学习。医学教育中基于实践的学习区分了“能力”和“胜任力”,敦促教育工作者优先考虑能够解决问题和应用理论的学习。我们对学生言语治疗师(SLT)和教育工作者对实习临床学习的看法和期望以及这与能力的关系知之甚少。我们使用定性研究调查了学生SLT和教育工作者在临床环境中成功学习的信念和经验,以及他们如何看待自己的学习者/教育者角色。数据是通过个人访谈和焦点小组从28名学生和教育工作者那里收集的。使用专题分析对数据进行了调查。教育工作者将自己的角色视为促进者,发展临床推理、理解职业身份和获得独立性等核心技能。一些教育工作者将此视为一种共同学习模式,为自己的学习创造机会。在临床实习期间,学生的观念发生了变化,从关注自己的发展到寻求理解客户的观点、确定需求,并以合理的干预方案做出回应。旨在使SLT学习者成为有能力的专业人员,能够应用临床推理技能,被认为是SLT教育工作者的核心技能。通过了解学生如何学习能力来开发临床实习模型,可以提高学生SLT进入专业实践的准备程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care
International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
A Reflection On: Preparing the Dietetic Workforce of the Future – Developing Innovative Placements in Social Care Settings Editorial: Reflecting on 10 Years of the Journal A Reflection On: Integrating Threshold Concepts and Ways of Think and Practising: Supporting Physiotherapy Students to Develop a Holistic View of the Profession through Concept Mapping A Reflection On: Clinical Psychologists’ Experiences of Accessing Personal Therapy during Training: A Narrative Analysis A Reflection On: Simulated Learning in the Clinical Education of Novice Physiotherapy Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1