Library's quality impact on satisfaction and improvement priorities

IF 1.3 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library Management Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI:10.1108/lm-08-2022-0076
Sunitiya Thuannadee
{"title":"Library's quality impact on satisfaction and improvement priorities","authors":"Sunitiya Thuannadee","doi":"10.1108/lm-08-2022-0076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to identify library service dimensions at the Suranaree University of Technology (SUT), Thailand, examine the effect of perceived quality on overall satisfaction and determine the library service's improvement priorities.Design/methodology/approachThe modified service quality (SERVQUAL) questionnaire was administered to SUT faculty and students. The perceived quality of service attributes was determined by comparing the perception of the actual service received with the expectation. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was utilized to classify the service dimensions, and proportional odds ordinal logistic regression was employed to examine the impact of perceived quality on overall satisfaction. The improvement priorities were determined using the importance–performance analysis (IPA).FindingsEFA suggested four service dimensions of the SUT library services: collection and access, organizational service, service delivery by staff and library as a place. The perceived quality of all dimensions positively affected overall satisfaction. However, the “library as a place” had a nonsignificant effect on faculty satisfaction, while the “collection and access” had a nonsignificant effect on student satisfaction.Originality/valueIn the context of library services, few studies have examined the effect of perceived quality on satisfaction and investigated improvement priorities using IPA. This study addresses these research gaps and provides deeper insights into the faculty and student perspectives on the university library services.","PeriodicalId":46701,"journal":{"name":"Library Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-08-2022-0076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to identify library service dimensions at the Suranaree University of Technology (SUT), Thailand, examine the effect of perceived quality on overall satisfaction and determine the library service's improvement priorities.Design/methodology/approachThe modified service quality (SERVQUAL) questionnaire was administered to SUT faculty and students. The perceived quality of service attributes was determined by comparing the perception of the actual service received with the expectation. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was utilized to classify the service dimensions, and proportional odds ordinal logistic regression was employed to examine the impact of perceived quality on overall satisfaction. The improvement priorities were determined using the importance–performance analysis (IPA).FindingsEFA suggested four service dimensions of the SUT library services: collection and access, organizational service, service delivery by staff and library as a place. The perceived quality of all dimensions positively affected overall satisfaction. However, the “library as a place” had a nonsignificant effect on faculty satisfaction, while the “collection and access” had a nonsignificant effect on student satisfaction.Originality/valueIn the context of library services, few studies have examined the effect of perceived quality on satisfaction and investigated improvement priorities using IPA. This study addresses these research gaps and provides deeper insights into the faculty and student perspectives on the university library services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图书馆质量对满意度和改进优先级的影响
目的本研究旨在确定泰国泗水理工大学的图书馆服务维度,检验感知质量对整体满意度的影响,并确定图书馆服务的改进重点。设计/方法/方法对SUT师生进行改良服务质量(SERVQUAL)问卷调查。感知的服务质量属性是通过将所接收的实际服务的感知与期望进行比较来确定的。采用探索性因素分析(EFA)对服务维度进行分类,并采用比例优势有序逻辑回归检验感知质量对整体满意度的影响。改进重点是通过重要性-绩效分析(IPA)确定的。FindingsEFA提出了SUT图书馆服务的四个服务层面:收集和访问、组织服务、工作人员提供的服务和图书馆作为一个地方。所有维度的感知质量都对整体满意度产生了积极影响。然而,“图书馆作为一个地方”对教师满意度的影响不显著,而“收藏和访问”对学生满意度的影响则不显著。原创性/价值在图书馆服务的背景下,很少有研究考察感知质量对满意度的影响,并使用IPA调查改进优先级。这项研究填补了这些研究空白,并对教师和学生对大学图书馆服务的看法提供了更深入的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Library Management
Library Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: ■strategic management ■HRM/HRO ■cultural diversity ■information use ■managing change ■quality management ■leadership ■teamwork ■marketing ■outsourcing ■automation ■library finance ■charging ■performance measurement ■data protection and copyright As information services become more complex in nature and more technologically sophisticated, managers need to keep pace with innovations and thinking in the field to offer the most professional service with the resources they have.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the library quality assurance system in supporting international accreditation of department at Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia Digitalization for enhancing reading habits: the improved hybrid book recommendation system with genre-oriented profiles Overwhelming effects of COVID-19 on public library services and recovery perspectives Evaluating the impact of LIS continuing professional development programmes: a survey of university libraries in Northern India User perceptions of ICT-based library services in the universities of Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1