Sustainable Development for Uganda: A Switch to Followership Model

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Philosophia Africana Pub Date : 2020-09-01 DOI:10.5325/philafri.19.2.0138
R. S. Nakabo
{"title":"Sustainable Development for Uganda: A Switch to Followership Model","authors":"R. S. Nakabo","doi":"10.5325/philafri.19.2.0138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Leadership, as a habit of thinking, assumes the alpha and omega position for pursuance of sustainable development in Uganda. However, what if we considered followership first? Using literature review, a conceptual framework, and critical reflexivity as data source and analysis, this paper provides a new approach to understand challenges in Uganda. The argument is to transcend leadership models and switch to followership model for possibilities of achieving especially sustainable development. This will not only strengthen democratic practices, but also offers more efficient and effective leadership methods. Followership remains the critical yet silent element that has caused the shift in focus from traits, behavior, and lastly, contingent leadership theories. It is why some leadership theorists are considering feminine styles as more effective because they are prejudiced as natural followers. I suggest possibilities of exploring a followership model where followership is the main factor upon which Empowerment for Sustainable Development (ESD) directly depends.","PeriodicalId":42045,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia Africana","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia Africana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/philafri.19.2.0138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Leadership, as a habit of thinking, assumes the alpha and omega position for pursuance of sustainable development in Uganda. However, what if we considered followership first? Using literature review, a conceptual framework, and critical reflexivity as data source and analysis, this paper provides a new approach to understand challenges in Uganda. The argument is to transcend leadership models and switch to followership model for possibilities of achieving especially sustainable development. This will not only strengthen democratic practices, but also offers more efficient and effective leadership methods. Followership remains the critical yet silent element that has caused the shift in focus from traits, behavior, and lastly, contingent leadership theories. It is why some leadership theorists are considering feminine styles as more effective because they are prejudiced as natural followers. I suggest possibilities of exploring a followership model where followership is the main factor upon which Empowerment for Sustainable Development (ESD) directly depends.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乌干达的可持续发展:转向追随模式
作为一种思维习惯,领导层在乌干达追求可持续发展方面处于首要地位。然而,如果我们首先考虑追随者会怎样?本文利用文献综述、概念框架和批判性自反性作为数据来源和分析,为理解乌干达的挑战提供了一种新的方法。其论点是超越领导模式,转向追随模式,以实现特别是可持续发展的可能性。这不仅将加强民主实践,而且还将提供更高效和有效的领导方法。追随者仍然是关键但沉默的因素,导致焦点从特质、行为,最后是偶然领导理论转移。这就是为什么一些领导理论家认为女性风格更有效的原因,因为她们作为天生的追随者有偏见。我建议探索追随者模式的可能性,在这种模式下,追随者是赋权促进可持续发展(ESD)直接依赖的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophia Africana
Philosophia Africana PHILOSOPHY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Enactivist African Philosophy: A Response A New Approach to African Philosophy: A Critique What Is Native to Philosophy? A Critique of Wiredu’s Project of Conceptual Decolonization of African Philosophy Spaces of Thought: A Response to Critiques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1