COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RADIATION SHIELD WALL BETWEEN LEAD-LAYERS AND PLASTERING BRICK-LAYERS

A. S. Wibowo, E. Cahyono, R. S. Iswari, Kholik Al Amin, M. Jannah
{"title":"COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RADIATION SHIELD WALL BETWEEN LEAD-LAYERS AND PLASTERING BRICK-LAYERS","authors":"A. S. Wibowo, E. Cahyono, R. S. Iswari, Kholik Al Amin, M. Jannah","doi":"10.31983/jrk.v11i2.9307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rate of exposure to X-ray radiation on the radiation shielding wall at the Laboratory 3 of Radiology Study Program Purwokerto Diploma Three Program has been analyzed, to find out the difference in the effectiveness of the radiation shielding wall between a 10 cm thick Lead (2 mm) coated partition and a 28 cm thick stucco brick wall. Measurements were made using a radiation source, namely a mobile unit X-ray machine with a Fluke survey meter radiation measuring instrument. Measurement of the rate of exposure to X-ray radiation is carried out by adjusting the distance of the radiation source with the radiation shield wall from 100 cm, 150 cm and 200 cm and taken from 5 measurement points that represent the radiation shield wall. The measurement results show that measurement point C produces the highest radiation exposure rate and measurement point A produces the lowest radiation exposure rate for Do and D. There is a radiation exposure rate of more than 1 μSv/Hr after passing through a 10 cm thick Lead-coated partition wall (2 mm) at a distance of 100 cm to 150 cm. Radiation shielding walls of walls covered with stucco bricks with a thickness of 28 cm were more effective than partitions covered with lead (2 mm) with a thickness of 10 cm. It is necessary to pay attention to aspects of radiation protection, the use of a mobile unit X-ray machine in placing the X-ray tube in the direction of the X-ray tube and, the radiation source distance of at least 2 meters from the lead-coated partition radiation wall.","PeriodicalId":52993,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Kesehatan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Kesehatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31983/jrk.v11i2.9307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rate of exposure to X-ray radiation on the radiation shielding wall at the Laboratory 3 of Radiology Study Program Purwokerto Diploma Three Program has been analyzed, to find out the difference in the effectiveness of the radiation shielding wall between a 10 cm thick Lead (2 mm) coated partition and a 28 cm thick stucco brick wall. Measurements were made using a radiation source, namely a mobile unit X-ray machine with a Fluke survey meter radiation measuring instrument. Measurement of the rate of exposure to X-ray radiation is carried out by adjusting the distance of the radiation source with the radiation shield wall from 100 cm, 150 cm and 200 cm and taken from 5 measurement points that represent the radiation shield wall. The measurement results show that measurement point C produces the highest radiation exposure rate and measurement point A produces the lowest radiation exposure rate for Do and D. There is a radiation exposure rate of more than 1 μSv/Hr after passing through a 10 cm thick Lead-coated partition wall (2 mm) at a distance of 100 cm to 150 cm. Radiation shielding walls of walls covered with stucco bricks with a thickness of 28 cm were more effective than partitions covered with lead (2 mm) with a thickness of 10 cm. It is necessary to pay attention to aspects of radiation protection, the use of a mobile unit X-ray machine in placing the X-ray tube in the direction of the X-ray tube and, the radiation source distance of at least 2 meters from the lead-coated partition radiation wall.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铅层与抹灰砖层防辐射墙效果比较
本文分析了放射学研究计划普尔沃克托三级文凭计划3实验室辐射屏蔽墙的x射线照射率,以找出10厘米厚的铅(2毫米)涂层隔墙和28厘米厚的灰泥砖墙的辐射屏蔽效果的差异。测量使用辐射源,即移动单元x射线机与Fluke测量仪辐射测量仪器。通过调整辐射源与辐射屏蔽墙的距离,从100厘米、150厘米和200厘米,从代表辐射屏蔽墙的5个测量点测量x射线辐射暴露率。测量结果表明,测点C对Do和d产生的辐射暴露率最高,测点A对d产生的辐射暴露率最低,在100 ~ 150 cm的距离上穿过10 cm厚(2mm)的铅涂墙后,辐射暴露率大于1 μSv/Hr。用28厘米厚的灰泥砖覆盖的墙体的辐射屏蔽墙比用10厘米厚的铅(2毫米)覆盖的隔墙更有效。要注意辐射防护方面,使用移动单元x光机时要将x射线管放置在与x射线管方向一致的地方,辐射源距离涂铅隔断辐射墙至少2米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quality Of Life For Adolescents With Divorced Parents On Physical And Psychological Conditions In Indonesia: Literature Review Analysis of P4K Filling in The MCH Book with Factor of Maternal Death Based on Three Delays (3T) in 2022 In The Jember District Assessing Efficiency and Image Quality of Dental Radiography Using Modified Dental Holders with Silicone Rubber Integration Risk Factors for Dental Caries in Elementary School Children Aged 6-12 in Indonesia (Systematic Literatur Review) Factors Associated With Administration of Antiplatelet Therapy on The NIHSS Score in Acute Ischemic Stroke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1