Case study of combined marine and land‐based passive seismic surveying in front of Nordenskiöldbreen outlet glacier, Adolfbukta, Svalbard

IF 1.1 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Near Surface Geophysics Pub Date : 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1002/nsg.12266
H. M. Stemland, B. Ruud, T. Johansen
{"title":"Case study of combined marine and land‐based passive seismic surveying in front of Nordenskiöldbreen outlet glacier, Adolfbukta, Svalbard","authors":"H. M. Stemland, B. Ruud, T. Johansen","doi":"10.1002/nsg.12266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glaciers generate seismic waves due to calving and fracturing, and recording and following event classification can be used to monitor glacier dynamics. Our aim with this study is to analyze seismic data acquired at the seabed and on land in front of Nordenskiöldbreen on Svalbard during 8 days in October 2020. The survey included 27 ocean bottom nodes, each equipped with three geophones and a hydrophone, and 101 land‐based geophones. The resulting data contain numerous seismic P‐, S‐, and Scholte wave events throughout the study period, as well as non‐seismic gravity waves. The recording quality strongly depends on receiver type and location, especially for the latter wave types. Our results demonstrate that hydrophones at the seabed are advantageous to record gravity waves, and that Scholte waves are only recorded close to the glacier. The Scholte waves are used to estimate the near‐surface S‐wave profile of the seabed sediments, and the gravity wave amplitudes are converted to wave height at the surface. We further discuss possible source mechanisms for the recorded events and present evidence that waves from earthquakes, calving, and brittle fracturing of the glacier and icebergs are all represented in the data. The interpretation is based on frequency content, duration, seismic velocities, and onset (emergent/impulsive), and supported by source localization which we show is challenging for this dataset. In conclusion, our study demonstrates the potential of using seismic for detecting glacier‐related events and provides valuable knowledge about the importance of survey geometry, particularly the advantages of including seabed receivers in the vicinity of the glacier.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":49771,"journal":{"name":"Near Surface Geophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Near Surface Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.12266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glaciers generate seismic waves due to calving and fracturing, and recording and following event classification can be used to monitor glacier dynamics. Our aim with this study is to analyze seismic data acquired at the seabed and on land in front of Nordenskiöldbreen on Svalbard during 8 days in October 2020. The survey included 27 ocean bottom nodes, each equipped with three geophones and a hydrophone, and 101 land‐based geophones. The resulting data contain numerous seismic P‐, S‐, and Scholte wave events throughout the study period, as well as non‐seismic gravity waves. The recording quality strongly depends on receiver type and location, especially for the latter wave types. Our results demonstrate that hydrophones at the seabed are advantageous to record gravity waves, and that Scholte waves are only recorded close to the glacier. The Scholte waves are used to estimate the near‐surface S‐wave profile of the seabed sediments, and the gravity wave amplitudes are converted to wave height at the surface. We further discuss possible source mechanisms for the recorded events and present evidence that waves from earthquakes, calving, and brittle fracturing of the glacier and icebergs are all represented in the data. The interpretation is based on frequency content, duration, seismic velocities, and onset (emergent/impulsive), and supported by source localization which we show is challenging for this dataset. In conclusion, our study demonstrates the potential of using seismic for detecting glacier‐related events and provides valuable knowledge about the importance of survey geometry, particularly the advantages of including seabed receivers in the vicinity of the glacier.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
斯瓦尔巴群岛阿道夫布克塔Nordenskiöldbreen出口冰川前海洋和陆地被动地震联合测量的案例研究
冰川由于崩解和破裂而产生地震波,记录和遵循事件分类可用于监测冰川动力学。我们进行这项研究的目的是分析2020年10月8天期间在斯瓦尔巴群岛Nordenskiöldbreen前方海床和陆地上采集的地震数据。调查包括27个海底节点,每个节点配备三个地震检波器和一个水听器,以及101个陆基地震检波器。所得数据包含整个研究期间的大量地震P波、S波和Scholte波事件,以及非地震重力波。记录质量在很大程度上取决于接收器类型和位置,尤其是对于后一种波类型。我们的研究结果表明,海底的水听器有利于记录重力波,而Scholte波只在冰川附近记录。Scholte波用于估计海底沉积物的近地表S波剖面,重力波振幅转换为地表波高。我们进一步讨论了记录事件的可能来源机制,并提供了证据,证明地震、冰裂和冰川和冰山的脆性破裂产生的波浪都在数据中得到了体现。解释基于频率内容、持续时间、地震速度和开始(突发/脉冲),并得到震源定位的支持,我们表明这对该数据集来说是具有挑战性的。总之,我们的研究证明了利用地震探测冰川相关事件的潜力,并提供了关于测量几何形状重要性的宝贵知识,特别是在冰川附近包括海底接收器的优势。这篇文章受版权保护。保留所有权利
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Near Surface Geophysics
Near Surface Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
42
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Near Surface Geophysics is an international journal for the publication of research and development in geophysics applied to near surface. It places emphasis on geological, hydrogeological, geotechnical, environmental, engineering, mining, archaeological, agricultural and other applications of geophysics as well as physical soil and rock properties. Geophysical and geoscientific case histories with innovative use of geophysical techniques are welcome, which may include improvements on instrumentation, measurements, data acquisition and processing, modelling, inversion, interpretation, project management and multidisciplinary use. The papers should also be understandable to those who use geophysical data but are not necessarily geophysicists.
期刊最新文献
Application of iterative elastic reverse time migration to shear horizontal ultrasonic echo data obtained at a concrete step specimen Innovative imaging of iron deposits using cross‐gradient joint inversion of potential field data with petrophysical correlation A fine‐tuning workflow for automatic first‐break picking with deep learning How to promote geophysics as a standard tool for geotechnical investigations Integration of ground geophysical methods to characterize near‐surface aquifer zones within an active mine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1