Brexitiness: The Ebbs and Flows of British Eurosceptic Rhetoric since 1945

IF 0.3 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Open Library of Humanities Pub Date : 2019-08-22 DOI:10.16995/OLH.424
C. Mair
{"title":"Brexitiness: The Ebbs and Flows of British Eurosceptic Rhetoric since 1945","authors":"C. Mair","doi":"10.16995/OLH.424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2016 EU referendum has already left a lasting imprint on the English language. Building on previous research (e.g. Lalic-Krstin & Silaski 2018, Buckledee 2018), the present article integrates discourse-analytical and corpus-based methods to explore current developments and place them in the historical context of the past 70 years. Using the News on the Web (NoW) corpus, which covers the years from the run-up to the referendum to the present, I will show that Brexit discourse comprises not only the neologisms inspired by the event itself, but also a number of tropes such as ‘take/want (one’s) country back’, ‘take back control’, ‘(a truly) global Britain’, and more, most of which have developed from discourses of long historical standing. This history will be explored using the Hansard Corpus, which – despite caveats articulated by Mollin (2007) – has proved a valuable resource for the purpose at hand. The analysis will show that at various stages since 1945, Euroscepticism has meshed both with the rhetoric of the political left and the political right and that, ultimately, the UK’s position vis a vis Europe has been negotiated in the context of massive sociocultural transformations such as the dissolution of the British Empire and the European postwar economic boom. Pro-European sentiment, which reached its peak in the 1975 referendum endorsing membership in the European Economic Community, shows Britain having overcome the collective ‘phantom pain’ following the dissolution of the British Empire and the erosion of its position as a major world power. The break-up of this pro-European consensus has revealed cultural rifts in the UK which go deeper than the immediate political and economic context of the Brexit vote.","PeriodicalId":43026,"journal":{"name":"Open Library of Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Library of Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/OLH.424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The 2016 EU referendum has already left a lasting imprint on the English language. Building on previous research (e.g. Lalic-Krstin & Silaski 2018, Buckledee 2018), the present article integrates discourse-analytical and corpus-based methods to explore current developments and place them in the historical context of the past 70 years. Using the News on the Web (NoW) corpus, which covers the years from the run-up to the referendum to the present, I will show that Brexit discourse comprises not only the neologisms inspired by the event itself, but also a number of tropes such as ‘take/want (one’s) country back’, ‘take back control’, ‘(a truly) global Britain’, and more, most of which have developed from discourses of long historical standing. This history will be explored using the Hansard Corpus, which – despite caveats articulated by Mollin (2007) – has proved a valuable resource for the purpose at hand. The analysis will show that at various stages since 1945, Euroscepticism has meshed both with the rhetoric of the political left and the political right and that, ultimately, the UK’s position vis a vis Europe has been negotiated in the context of massive sociocultural transformations such as the dissolution of the British Empire and the European postwar economic boom. Pro-European sentiment, which reached its peak in the 1975 referendum endorsing membership in the European Economic Community, shows Britain having overcome the collective ‘phantom pain’ following the dissolution of the British Empire and the erosion of its position as a major world power. The break-up of this pro-European consensus has revealed cultural rifts in the UK which go deeper than the immediate political and economic context of the Brexit vote.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脱欧:1945年以来英国疑欧主义修辞的波折
2016年的脱欧公投已经给英语留下了持久的印记。在之前的研究(如Lalic-Krstin & Silaski 2018, Buckledee 2018)的基础上,本文整合了话语分析和基于语料库的方法来探索当前的发展,并将其置于过去70年的历史背景中。使用网络新闻语料库(NoW),涵盖了从公投前到现在的几年,我将展示英国脱欧话语不仅包括受事件本身启发的新词,还包括许多修辞,如“夺回/想要(一个)国家”,“夺回控制权”,“(真正的)全球英国”等等,其中大多数都是从历史悠久的话语中发展而来的。这段历史将使用汉莎语料库进行探索,尽管Mollin(2007)明确提出了警告,但它已被证明是一种有价值的资源。分析将表明,自1945年以来的不同阶段,欧洲怀疑主义与政治左翼和政治右翼的言论都有交集,最终,英国对欧洲的立场是在大规模社会文化转型的背景下谈判的,比如大英帝国的解体和欧洲战后的经济繁荣。亲欧情绪在1975年支持加入欧洲经济共同体的公投中达到顶峰,这表明英国已经克服了大英帝国解体后的集体“幻痛”,以及英国作为世界主要大国的地位受到侵蚀。这种亲欧共识的破裂,揭示了英国的文化分歧,这种分歧比英国退欧公投的直接政治和经济背景更为深刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Library of Humanities
Open Library of Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Open Library of Humanities is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal open to submissions from researchers working in any humanities'' discipline in any language. The journal is funded by an international library consortium and has no charges to authors or readers. The Open Library of Humanities is digitally preserved in the CLOCKSS archive.
期刊最新文献
(Un)staþolfæstnes and its Problems: Grounding Minds in Early Medieval England Briefing Paper: Assessing the Period Products (Free Provision) (Scotland) Act 2021 as Model Menstruation Legislation Lost in Fragmentation: On how to deal with Fragments of a special Performance Form from Mali in the Collection KOLK 17 in Lübeck Confinement and the Transnational in Emma Donoghue’s Room Periods and the Menstrualscape: Menstrual Technology and Economic Imperatives in Scotland and the United States, 1870-2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1