Structural organization of the rat hyppocampal formation

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Sibirskii nauchnyi meditsinskii zhurnal Pub Date : 2023-06-22 DOI:10.18699/ssmj20230301
S. Zimatkin, T. V. Klimuts, A. V. Zaerko
{"title":"Structural organization of the rat hyppocampal formation","authors":"S. Zimatkin, T. V. Klimuts, A. V. Zaerko","doi":"10.18699/ssmj20230301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The review examines the historical aspects of the hippocampus nomenclature. Its anatomical study began by the ancient Greeks, who called the unusual–looking structure a “ram’s horn” – cornu ammonis. The term “hippocampus” (ancient Greek: ἱππόκαμπος, from ἵππος, “horse” and κάμπος, “sea monster”, or “sea-horse”) was first introduced in the sixteenth century by anatomist J.C. Arantius. The term “hippocampal formation” is currently applied to a group of cytoarchitectonically different adjacent areas, including, along with the hippocampus itself, the dentate gyrus, subiculum, presubiculum, parasubiculum and entorhinal cortex. The reason for including these six regions in the “hippocampal formation” group is that they are connected to each other by unique and largely unidirectional pathways. The review is devoted to the spatial, morphological and cyto- and myeloarchitectonic organization of all departments of the rat hippocampus formation and the distinctive neuroanatomic characteristics of its departments. Comparative features of the structure of the hippocampus formation of a rat, monkey and human are described. Although the volume of the hippocampus is about 10 times larger in monkeys and 100 times larger in humans compared to rats, the basic architecture of the hippocampus formation is common, although there are some species differences. The relatively simple organization of the main cellular layers in combination with the highly organized laminar distribution of hippocampal neuron processes contributes to its use as a model system in modern neuroscience.","PeriodicalId":33781,"journal":{"name":"Sibirskii nauchnyi meditsinskii zhurnal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sibirskii nauchnyi meditsinskii zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18699/ssmj20230301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The review examines the historical aspects of the hippocampus nomenclature. Its anatomical study began by the ancient Greeks, who called the unusual–looking structure a “ram’s horn” – cornu ammonis. The term “hippocampus” (ancient Greek: ἱππόκαμπος, from ἵππος, “horse” and κάμπος, “sea monster”, or “sea-horse”) was first introduced in the sixteenth century by anatomist J.C. Arantius. The term “hippocampal formation” is currently applied to a group of cytoarchitectonically different adjacent areas, including, along with the hippocampus itself, the dentate gyrus, subiculum, presubiculum, parasubiculum and entorhinal cortex. The reason for including these six regions in the “hippocampal formation” group is that they are connected to each other by unique and largely unidirectional pathways. The review is devoted to the spatial, morphological and cyto- and myeloarchitectonic organization of all departments of the rat hippocampus formation and the distinctive neuroanatomic characteristics of its departments. Comparative features of the structure of the hippocampus formation of a rat, monkey and human are described. Although the volume of the hippocampus is about 10 times larger in monkeys and 100 times larger in humans compared to rats, the basic architecture of the hippocampus formation is common, although there are some species differences. The relatively simple organization of the main cellular layers in combination with the highly organized laminar distribution of hippocampal neuron processes contributes to its use as a model system in modern neuroscience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大鼠下丘脑形成的结构组织
回顾了海马体命名法的历史方面。它的解剖学研究始于古希腊人,他们称这种不寻常的结构为“公羊角”。术语“海马”(古希腊:ἱππόκαμπος),从ἵππος),“马”和κάμπος),“海怪”,或“海马”)在16世纪首次由解剖学家J.C.镏。“海马形成”一词目前被应用于一组细胞结构不同的相邻区域,除了海马本身,还包括齿状回、下带、下前带、副下带和嗅内皮层。将这六个区域包括在“海马体形成”组中的原因是,它们通过独特且基本上单向的途径相互连接。本文综述了大鼠海马形成各部门的空间、形态、细胞和骨髓结构组织及其各部门的独特神经解剖学特征。描述了大鼠、猴和人海马形成结构的比较特征。尽管与老鼠相比,猴子的海马体体积大约是老鼠的10倍,人类的海马体体积大约是老鼠的100倍,但海马体形成的基本结构是共同的,尽管存在一些物种差异。主要细胞层的相对简单组织与海马神经元过程的高度组织层流分布相结合,有助于其作为现代神经科学的模型系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The relationship between methylation of tumor suppressor genes <i>APC</i>, <i>GSTP1</i>, <i>RASSF1A</i> and content of prostate-specific antigen- associated markers in prostate cancer diagnosis Changes in the <i>MIR-143</i. gene methylation pattern in the tumor tissue of the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Some indicators of nutritional security of children with restrictive types of nutrition Influence of alcohol consumption on the levels of surfactant proteins SP-A and SP-D in blood in men and women in Novosibirsk Association of vitamin D deficiency and preterm birth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1