What is a propensity score? Applications and extensions of balancing score methods

E. Stuart
{"title":"What is a propensity score? Applications and extensions of balancing score methods","authors":"E. Stuart","doi":"10.1353/obs.2023.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The foundational propensity score paper by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983a) laid the foundation for a set of methods widely used in the design of non-experimental studies. This commentary reflects on the theoretical contributions of that paper –especially the idea of the propensity score as a balancing score –as well as on the wide variety of contexts in which the general idea of a balancing score has since been applied. Areas in which the fundamental ideas of a balancing score –which can help equate two groups on the basis of a set of covariates –have been extended include mediation analysis and generalizability. The commentary also touches on common misperceptions regarding propensity scores, and on the key role of the “other” Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983b) paper, which laid out a method for assessing the sensitivity of study results to violation of the key assumption underlying most uses of propensity scores –that of no unmeasured confounding. All together, this body of work has changed how many fields conduct non-experimental studies, and other related types of studies, and with many applications and extensions yet to come.","PeriodicalId":74335,"journal":{"name":"Observational studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Observational studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/obs.2023.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The foundational propensity score paper by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983a) laid the foundation for a set of methods widely used in the design of non-experimental studies. This commentary reflects on the theoretical contributions of that paper –especially the idea of the propensity score as a balancing score –as well as on the wide variety of contexts in which the general idea of a balancing score has since been applied. Areas in which the fundamental ideas of a balancing score –which can help equate two groups on the basis of a set of covariates –have been extended include mediation analysis and generalizability. The commentary also touches on common misperceptions regarding propensity scores, and on the key role of the “other” Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983b) paper, which laid out a method for assessing the sensitivity of study results to violation of the key assumption underlying most uses of propensity scores –that of no unmeasured confounding. All together, this body of work has changed how many fields conduct non-experimental studies, and other related types of studies, and with many applications and extensions yet to come.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么是倾向得分?平衡计分法的应用与推广
摘要:Rosenbaum和Rubin (1983a)的基础性倾向评分论文为一系列广泛应用于非实验研究设计的方法奠定了基础。这篇评论反映了那篇论文的理论贡献——尤其是倾向分数作为平衡分数的观点——以及平衡分数的一般观点此后被应用的各种各样的背景。平衡分数的基本思想——它可以帮助在一组协变量的基础上使两组相等——已经得到扩展的领域包括中介分析和概括性。这篇评论还触及了关于倾向分数的常见误解,以及“另一篇”Rosenbaum和Rubin (1983b)论文的关键作用,该论文提出了一种方法,用于评估研究结果对违反倾向分数的主要假设的敏感性,即没有未测量的混杂。总之,这些工作已经改变了许多领域进行非实验研究的方式,以及其他相关类型的研究,并且有许多应用和扩展尚未到来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does matching introduce confounding or selection bias into the matched case-control design? Size-biased sensitivity analysis for matched pairs design to assess the impact of healthcare-associated infections A Software Tutorial for Matching in Clustered Observational Studies Using a difference-in-difference control trial to test an intervention aimed at increasing the take-up of a welfare payment in New Zealand Estimating Treatment Effect with Propensity Score Weighted Regression and Double Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1