Modeling Constructive Alignment, Integration and Differentiation in Science Modules: A Blended Learning Tool in a Flexible Educational Landscape

Rachelle O. Holland
{"title":"Modeling Constructive Alignment, Integration and Differentiation in Science Modules: A Blended Learning Tool in a Flexible Educational Landscape","authors":"Rachelle O. Holland","doi":"10.12691/education-11-6-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study analyzed the constructive alignment of the learning competencies, learning activities, and assessment in the Learner's Packet for third-grade Science. The use of integration and differentiation in the Learning Packets was also explored. The analysis results were used to develop the Learning Exemplar to model constructive alignment, integration, and differentiation. The second quarter content, performance standards, and learning competencies in the Simplified Module Intended for Learning Encounters (SMILE) Learner's Packet used by the third-grade students in Department of Education Naga City Division in the Philippines during the Covid-19 pandemic school years were the ones subjected to the analysis. The language errors and validation of the Learning Plan exemplars were beyond the scope of the study. The descriptive evaluative research was used to analyze the constructive alignment, whereas the descriptive developmental research was applied in the development of the Learning Plan Exemplars. Qualitative descriptive research was used in describing the constructive alignment, integration, differentiation, and the different approaches in developing the Learning Exemplar. Document analysis and the Evaluation Guide developed by the researcher were used in gathering data. The study revealed that Learning competencies, learning activities, and assessments in the Learner's Packet were partially aligned. There were minimal integration and no differentiation done in the Learner's Packet. The Learning Plan Exemplars were developed modeling constructive alignment, integration, and differentiation with the use of RAISE (Review- Activate-Immerse-Synthesize-Evaluate) learning plans, Differentiated Instruction (DI), UbD (Understanding by Design) Framework and 5Es (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate) format.","PeriodicalId":91652,"journal":{"name":"American journal of educational research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of educational research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/education-11-6-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study analyzed the constructive alignment of the learning competencies, learning activities, and assessment in the Learner's Packet for third-grade Science. The use of integration and differentiation in the Learning Packets was also explored. The analysis results were used to develop the Learning Exemplar to model constructive alignment, integration, and differentiation. The second quarter content, performance standards, and learning competencies in the Simplified Module Intended for Learning Encounters (SMILE) Learner's Packet used by the third-grade students in Department of Education Naga City Division in the Philippines during the Covid-19 pandemic school years were the ones subjected to the analysis. The language errors and validation of the Learning Plan exemplars were beyond the scope of the study. The descriptive evaluative research was used to analyze the constructive alignment, whereas the descriptive developmental research was applied in the development of the Learning Plan Exemplars. Qualitative descriptive research was used in describing the constructive alignment, integration, differentiation, and the different approaches in developing the Learning Exemplar. Document analysis and the Evaluation Guide developed by the researcher were used in gathering data. The study revealed that Learning competencies, learning activities, and assessments in the Learner's Packet were partially aligned. There were minimal integration and no differentiation done in the Learner's Packet. The Learning Plan Exemplars were developed modeling constructive alignment, integration, and differentiation with the use of RAISE (Review- Activate-Immerse-Synthesize-Evaluate) learning plans, Differentiated Instruction (DI), UbD (Understanding by Design) Framework and 5Es (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate) format.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学模块中的建构性对齐、整合和差异建模:灵活教育环境中的混合学习工具
本研究分析了三年级科学学习包中学习能力、学习活动和评估的建设性一致性。本文还探讨了在学习包中使用整合和区分的方法。分析结果被用来开发学习范例来模拟建设性的结盟、整合和差异化。分析对象是菲律宾教育部那加市分部三年级学生在2019冠状病毒病大流行学年期间使用的“学习接触简化模块”(SMILE)学习包的第二季度内容、表现标准和学习能力。学习计划范例的语言错误和验证不在研究范围之内。本研究采用描述性评价研究分析建设性一致性,而描述性发展研究则应用于学习计划样本的开发。本研究采用定性描述研究方法,描述了建构性结盟、整合、区分和不同的学习范例开发方法。资料收集采用文献分析和研究者开发的评价指南。研究表明,学习能力、学习活动和学习者包中的评估是部分一致的。在学习包中有最小的整合和没有分化。学习计划范例是通过使用RAISE(复习-激活-沉浸-综合-评估)学习计划、差异化教学(DI)、UbD(设计理解)框架和5e(参与、探索、解释、阐述和评估)格式,对建设性的一致性、整合和差异化进行建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital Revolution in Higher Education: An Empirical Assessment of the Association Between Digital Technologies and Learning Outcomes Challenges, Coping Mechanisms, Motivation, and Support Needs for Out-of-Field Science Teachers in Western Mindanao Motivating Factors that Lure the School Going Boys and Other Riders into the Boda-boda Business in Kirinyaga East Sub-county Enhancing Science Education in Ningo-Prampram, Ghana: Implementing Viable Hands-On Experiments and Science Fairs The Use of Brain Based Learning Elements in a Teaching Approach for Scientific Understanding of Biology Concepts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1