The Relative Effectiveness of Teachers and Learning Software: Evidence from a Field Experiment in El Salvador

IF 3.9 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Labor Economics Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.1086/717727
K. Buechel, M. Jakob, Christoph Kuehnhanss, Daniel Steffen, A. Brunetti
{"title":"The Relative Effectiveness of Teachers and Learning Software: Evidence from a Field Experiment in El Salvador","authors":"K. Buechel, M. Jakob, Christoph Kuehnhanss, Daniel Steffen, A. Brunetti","doi":"10.1086/717727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study provides evidence on the relative effectiveness of computer-assisted learning (CAL) software and traditional teaching. Based on a field experiment in Salvadoran primary schools, we evaluate three interventions that aim to improve learning in mathematics: (i) additional teacher-led classes, (ii) additional CAL classes monitored by a supervisor, and (iii) additional CAL classes instructed by a teacher. We find that CAL lessons lead to larger learning gains and are less sensitive to class size as well as student ability than teacher-centered classes. Our results highlight the value of CAL in an environment with heterogeneous classes and poorly qualified teachers.","PeriodicalId":48308,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Labor Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Labor Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717727","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

This study provides evidence on the relative effectiveness of computer-assisted learning (CAL) software and traditional teaching. Based on a field experiment in Salvadoran primary schools, we evaluate three interventions that aim to improve learning in mathematics: (i) additional teacher-led classes, (ii) additional CAL classes monitored by a supervisor, and (iii) additional CAL classes instructed by a teacher. We find that CAL lessons lead to larger learning gains and are less sensitive to class size as well as student ability than teacher-centered classes. Our results highlight the value of CAL in an environment with heterogeneous classes and poorly qualified teachers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教师和学习软件的相对有效性:来自萨尔瓦多实地实验的证据
本研究为计算机辅助学习软件与传统教学的相对有效性提供了证据。基于在萨尔瓦多小学进行的实地实验,我们评估了旨在改善数学学习的三种干预措施:(i)额外的教师主导课程,(ii)额外的由主管监督的CAL课程,以及(iii)额外的由教师指导的CAL课程。我们发现,与以教师为中心的课程相比,CAL课程可以带来更大的学习收益,并且对班级规模和学生能力的敏感度较低。我们的研究结果突出了CAL在班级异构和教师素质低下的环境中的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Since 1983, the Journal of Labor Economics has presented international research that examines issues affecting the economy as well as social and private behavior. The Journal publishes both theoretical and applied research results relating to the U.S. and international data. And its contributors investigate various aspects of labor economics, including supply and demand of labor services, personnel economics, distribution of income, unions and collective bargaining, applied and policy issues in labor economics, and labor markets and demographics.
期刊最新文献
Trade Competition and the Decline in Union Organizing: Evidence from Certification Elections Geographic Variation in Cesarean Sections in the United States: Trends, Correlates, and Other Interesting Facts. The Impact of an Early Career Shock on Intergenerational Mobility Introduction to the Volume Introduction to the Volume
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1