Unacceptable behaviours between healthcare workers: just the tip of the patient safety iceberg

E. Bamberger, Peter A. Bamberger
{"title":"Unacceptable behaviours between healthcare workers: just the tip of the patient safety iceberg","authors":"E. Bamberger, Peter A. Bamberger","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial reuse. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. Since the publication of the 1999 ‘To Err is Human’ report by the Institute of Medicine, healthcare researchers have been attentive to factors potentially associated with iatrogenic risk, or in other words medical care that exacerbates or complicates an existing patient condition. While studies have explored a variety of patient factors (eg, age and weight of neonates) and situational constraints (eg, staffing ratios and healthcare worker (HCW) sleep deprivation ), the risks posed by negative interpersonal interactions in healthcare contexts remain understudied and poorly understood. It is therefore timely that in BMJ Quality & Safety, Guo and colleagues present a systematic review of research examining the effects of unacceptable behaviours between HCWs on clinical performance and patient outcomes. Guo and colleagues’ findings present an important step in raising awareness of the risks posed by negative interpersonal interactions among HCWs, shedding light on how and when such behaviour may indeed serve as a significant iatrogenic risk factor. However, as troubling as their findings may be, they may understate the magnitude and complexity of the challenge that unacceptable behaviours present to HCWs. In this editorial, we begin by commenting on the magnitude of impact that such behaviour has on clinical performance and patient safety, arguing that its true impact is most apparent when considered relative to the magnitude of impact of other iatrogenic risk factors. We then argue that other, largely unexplored, aspects of HCW exposure to unacceptable behaviour may impact clinical performance and patient safety no less than those aspects examined in Guo and colleagues’ review, highlighting (1) the collateral effects of unacceptable HCW behaviour on witnesses and HCW teams, and (2) the effects of unacceptable behaviour directed at HCWs by patients or their families.","PeriodicalId":49653,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","volume":"31 1","pages":"638 - 641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial reuse. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. Since the publication of the 1999 ‘To Err is Human’ report by the Institute of Medicine, healthcare researchers have been attentive to factors potentially associated with iatrogenic risk, or in other words medical care that exacerbates or complicates an existing patient condition. While studies have explored a variety of patient factors (eg, age and weight of neonates) and situational constraints (eg, staffing ratios and healthcare worker (HCW) sleep deprivation ), the risks posed by negative interpersonal interactions in healthcare contexts remain understudied and poorly understood. It is therefore timely that in BMJ Quality & Safety, Guo and colleagues present a systematic review of research examining the effects of unacceptable behaviours between HCWs on clinical performance and patient outcomes. Guo and colleagues’ findings present an important step in raising awareness of the risks posed by negative interpersonal interactions among HCWs, shedding light on how and when such behaviour may indeed serve as a significant iatrogenic risk factor. However, as troubling as their findings may be, they may understate the magnitude and complexity of the challenge that unacceptable behaviours present to HCWs. In this editorial, we begin by commenting on the magnitude of impact that such behaviour has on clinical performance and patient safety, arguing that its true impact is most apparent when considered relative to the magnitude of impact of other iatrogenic risk factors. We then argue that other, largely unexplored, aspects of HCW exposure to unacceptable behaviour may impact clinical performance and patient safety no less than those aspects examined in Guo and colleagues’ review, highlighting (1) the collateral effects of unacceptable HCW behaviour on witnesses and HCW teams, and (2) the effects of unacceptable behaviour directed at HCWs by patients or their families.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医护人员之间不可接受的行为:只是患者安全的冰山一角
©作者(或其雇主)2022。禁止商业重用。请参阅权利和权限。英国医学杂志出版。自1999年美国医学研究所发表《人孰能无过》报告以来,医疗保健研究人员一直在关注与医源性风险潜在相关的因素,换句话说,就是那些加剧或使现有患者病情复杂化的医疗护理。虽然研究已经探索了各种患者因素(例如,新生儿的年龄和体重)和情境限制(例如,人员配置比例和卫生保健工作者(HCW)睡眠剥夺),但卫生保健环境中负面人际互动所带来的风险仍未得到充分研究和了解。因此,在《BMJ质量与安全》杂志上,郭和他的同事发表了一篇系统的研究综述,研究了医护人员之间不可接受的行为对临床表现和患者预后的影响。Guo和他的同事们的发现在提高医护人员对负面人际交往所带来的风险的认识方面迈出了重要的一步,揭示了这种行为如何以及何时可能确实成为一个重要的医源性风险因素。然而,尽管他们的发现可能令人不安,但他们可能低估了不可接受的行为给卫生保健工作者带来的挑战的严重性和复杂性。在这篇社论中,我们首先评论了这种行为对临床表现和患者安全的影响程度,认为当考虑到其他医源性风险因素的影响程度时,其真正的影响是最明显的。然后,我们认为,医护人员暴露于不可接受行为的其他方面(很大程度上未被探索)可能会影响临床表现和患者安全,其影响程度不亚于郭及其同事的综述中所研究的那些方面,强调(1)不可接受的医护人员行为对证人和医护人员团队的附带影响,以及(2)患者或其家属对医护人员的不可接受行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality & Safety in Health Care
Quality & Safety in Health Care 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of telephone triage for predicting adverse outcomes in suspected COVID-19: an observational cohort study. Quality framework for remote antenatal care: qualitative study with women, healthcare professionals and system-level stakeholders. Addressing social determinants of health in primary care: a quasi-experimental study using unannounced standardised patients to evaluate the impact of audit/feedback on physicians' rates of identifying and responding to social needs. Reporting on implementation trials with null findings: the need for concurrent process evaluation reporting. Antibiotic documentation: death by a thousand clicks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1