Role of abbreviated non-contrast-enhanced MR-enterography in the evaluation of Crohn's disease activity and complications as an alternative for full protocol contrast-enhanced study: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Payam Jannatdoust , Parya Valizadeh , Mahshad Razaghi , Maedeh Rouzbahani , Amirbahador Abbasi , Arvin Arian
{"title":"Role of abbreviated non-contrast-enhanced MR-enterography in the evaluation of Crohn's disease activity and complications as an alternative for full protocol contrast-enhanced study: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Payam Jannatdoust ,&nbsp;Parya Valizadeh ,&nbsp;Mahshad Razaghi ,&nbsp;Maedeh Rouzbahani ,&nbsp;Amirbahador Abbasi ,&nbsp;Arvin Arian","doi":"10.1016/j.redii.2023.100030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic disorder that often starts at a young age and involves periods of remission and relapse. Prompt diagnosis of relapses through screening is crucial due to the potential morbid complications of untreated active inflammation. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is a noninvasive technique to screen for active inflammation. The standard protocol involves intravenous injection of contrast agents with potential side effects. Some abbreviated non-contrast-enhanced MRE protocols are proposed as alternatives for conventional MRE to identify active inflammation. Currently, there is controversy regarding the applicability and accuracy of these protocols. This study aims to describe and compare these protocols and evaluate their accuracy in detecting active inflammation and CD complications.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Results from a systematic search of three databases in August 2022 were queried and screened by abstract and full text. Eligible studies were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>59 studies entered the systematic review, and 37 were eligible for meta-analysis. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fast T2-weighted (T2w) sequences were most frequently used in abbreviated protocols and showed non-inferior accuracy compared to the full protocol in detecting active inflammation. ADC and qualitative DWI had pooled sensitivity of 90% (CI: 82–95%) and 89% (CI:82–93%) and pooled specificity of 94% (CI: 88–97%) and 89% (CI: 79–94%), respectively for detecting active inflammation. Moreover, T2w and combined T2w+DWI sequences had pooled sensitivity of 80% (CI: 64–90%) and 76% (CI: 61–86%) and pooled specificity of 90% (CI: 80–95%) and 87% (CI: 74 – 94%), respectively. Unenhanced protocols show relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in detecting penetrating complications of CD. Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) has demonstrated excellent accuracy in detecting fibrosis. High heterogeneity was observed in all subgroups, and accuracy was reported to be highly operator dependent in most studies.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>An abbreviated protocol consisting of DWI and fast T2w imaging can potentially replace the full protocol MRE. Full protocol MRE will still have its role in identifying penetrating complications. MTI should be indicated in case of suspected fibrostenotic disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74676,"journal":{"name":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772652523000091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic disorder that often starts at a young age and involves periods of remission and relapse. Prompt diagnosis of relapses through screening is crucial due to the potential morbid complications of untreated active inflammation. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is a noninvasive technique to screen for active inflammation. The standard protocol involves intravenous injection of contrast agents with potential side effects. Some abbreviated non-contrast-enhanced MRE protocols are proposed as alternatives for conventional MRE to identify active inflammation. Currently, there is controversy regarding the applicability and accuracy of these protocols. This study aims to describe and compare these protocols and evaluate their accuracy in detecting active inflammation and CD complications.

Methods

Results from a systematic search of three databases in August 2022 were queried and screened by abstract and full text. Eligible studies were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed by diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

Results

59 studies entered the systematic review, and 37 were eligible for meta-analysis. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fast T2-weighted (T2w) sequences were most frequently used in abbreviated protocols and showed non-inferior accuracy compared to the full protocol in detecting active inflammation. ADC and qualitative DWI had pooled sensitivity of 90% (CI: 82–95%) and 89% (CI:82–93%) and pooled specificity of 94% (CI: 88–97%) and 89% (CI: 79–94%), respectively for detecting active inflammation. Moreover, T2w and combined T2w+DWI sequences had pooled sensitivity of 80% (CI: 64–90%) and 76% (CI: 61–86%) and pooled specificity of 90% (CI: 80–95%) and 87% (CI: 74 – 94%), respectively. Unenhanced protocols show relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in detecting penetrating complications of CD. Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) has demonstrated excellent accuracy in detecting fibrosis. High heterogeneity was observed in all subgroups, and accuracy was reported to be highly operator dependent in most studies.

Conclusion

An abbreviated protocol consisting of DWI and fast T2w imaging can potentially replace the full protocol MRE. Full protocol MRE will still have its role in identifying penetrating complications. MTI should be indicated in case of suspected fibrostenotic disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
短时间非增强磁共振肠造影在评价克罗恩病活动性和并发症中作为全方案增强造影研究的替代方法的作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景克罗恩病(CD)是一种慢性疾病,通常在很小的时候就开始了,并经历了一段时间的缓解和复发。通过筛查及时诊断复发是至关重要的,因为未经治疗的活动性炎症可能会出现并发症。磁共振肠造影(MRE)是一种非侵入性技术,用于筛查活动性炎症。标准方案包括静脉注射有潜在副作用的造影剂。提出了一些缩写的非对比增强MRE方案作为常规MRE的替代方案,以识别活动性炎症。目前,关于这些协议的适用性和准确性存在争议。本研究旨在描述和比较这些方案,并评估其在检测活动性炎症和CD并发症方面的准确性。方法对2022年8月系统检索三个数据库的结果进行摘要和全文查询和筛选。通过诊断测试准确性荟萃分析对符合条件的研究进行定性和定量分析。结果59项研究进入系统综述,37项符合条件进行荟萃分析。扩散加权成像(DWI)和快速T2加权(T2w)序列在缩写方案中最常使用,并且在检测活动性炎症方面显示出与完整方案相比不差的准确性。ADC和定性DWI在检测活动性炎症方面的合并敏感性分别为90%(CI:82-95%)和89%(CI:82-33%),合并特异性分别为94%(CI:88-97%)和89%。此外,T2w和T2w+DWI组合序列的合并敏感性分别为80%(CI:64-90%)和76%(CI:61-86%),合并特异性分别为90%(CI:80-95%)和87%(CI:74-94%)。未强化的方案在检测CD穿透性并发症方面显示出相对较差的诊断准确性。磁化转移成像(MTI)在检测纤维化方面显示出优异的准确性。在所有亚组中都观察到高度异质性,据报道,在大多数研究中,准确性高度依赖于操作者。结论由DWI和快速T2w成像组成的简化方案有可能取代完整方案的MRE。完整方案MRE仍将在识别穿透并发症方面发挥作用。如果怀疑患有纤维狭窄性疾病,应提示MTI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dedicated software to harmonize the follow-up of oncological patients Glenoid morphology variation between patients with hypermobile shoulder joints and controls: Identification of hyperlaxity-related morphologic bone changes Efficacity of CT-guided intra-articular cervical facet steroid injection for cervical radiculopathy Evaluation of a new beads reflux control microcatheter in drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization Chest tube placement incidence when using gelatin sponge torpedoes after pulmonary radiofrequency ablation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1