The Google-DoubleClick Merger: Lessons From the Federal Trade Commission's Limitations on Protecting Privacy

Jenny S. Lee
{"title":"The Google-DoubleClick Merger: Lessons From the Federal Trade Commission's Limitations on Protecting Privacy","authors":"Jenny S. Lee","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1690330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of Big Tech’s growing power, much attention has been directed to the Federal Trade Commission as the regulatory force for monitoring the technology industry. But scholars are largely divided on the issue of whether privacy exists within the scope of antitrust law. Using the 2008 acquisition of DoubleClick by Google as a case study, this article argues that privacy is an antitrust issue and should have been considered in the FTC’s merger review process for the ways it affected both competition and consumer welfare. The article examines the role of consumer data in fortifying Google’s barriers to entry, squashing innovation, and reducing choice in the marketplace, and considers the invasion of data privacy as an issue of consumer protection. The article argues that the foundation for evaluating privacy within the merger review already exists, as Section 5 of the FTC Act gives the Commission special responsibility to uphold these values and interpret its review process in order to keep up with a changing market structure. More than a decade later, these lessons remain relevant, as antitrust law experiences a resurgence in the United States.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":"103 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1690330","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1690330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the wake of Big Tech’s growing power, much attention has been directed to the Federal Trade Commission as the regulatory force for monitoring the technology industry. But scholars are largely divided on the issue of whether privacy exists within the scope of antitrust law. Using the 2008 acquisition of DoubleClick by Google as a case study, this article argues that privacy is an antitrust issue and should have been considered in the FTC’s merger review process for the ways it affected both competition and consumer welfare. The article examines the role of consumer data in fortifying Google’s barriers to entry, squashing innovation, and reducing choice in the marketplace, and considers the invasion of data privacy as an issue of consumer protection. The article argues that the foundation for evaluating privacy within the merger review already exists, as Section 5 of the FTC Act gives the Commission special responsibility to uphold these values and interpret its review process in order to keep up with a changing market structure. More than a decade later, these lessons remain relevant, as antitrust law experiences a resurgence in the United States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谷歌-双击合并:从联邦贸易委员会在保护隐私方面的限制中吸取的教训
随着大型科技公司的实力不断增强,人们越来越关注作为监管科技行业的监管机构的联邦贸易委员会。但在反垄断法范围内是否存在隐私的问题上,学者们存在很大分歧。本文以2008年谷歌收购DoubleClick为例,认为隐私是一个反垄断问题,在联邦贸易委员会的合并审查过程中,应该考虑隐私对竞争和消费者福利的影响。这篇文章探讨了消费者数据在强化谷歌进入壁垒、压制创新和减少市场选择方面的作用,并将侵犯数据隐私视为消费者保护问题。文章认为,在合并审查中评估隐私的基础已经存在,因为《联邦贸易委员会法》第5条赋予委员会维护这些价值观的特殊责任,并解释其审查过程,以跟上不断变化的市场结构。十多年后,随着反垄断法在美国死灰复燃,这些教训仍然具有现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The societal, cultural, economic and political dimensions of communication, including the freedoms of speech and press, are undergoing dramatic global changes. The convergence of the mass media, telecommunications, and computers has raised important questions reflected in analyses of modern communication law, policy, and regulation. Serving as a forum for discussions of these continuing and emerging questions, Communication Law and Policy considers traditional and contemporary problems of freedom of expression and dissemination, including theoretical, conceptual and methodological issues inherent in the special conditions presented by new media and information technologies.
期刊最新文献
Digital Rights in Europe After the Entry Into Force of Regulations for the Protection of Personal Data: Before and After the Right to Be Forgotten Regulatory Capture in a Transitional Democracy: Media Laws in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq Paranoid Androids: Free Speech Versus Privacy in America’s Resistance Against Intrusive Robocalls An Unreasonable Standard?: The Dilemma of Applying Actual Malice to Irrational Speakers “The Gloss of History”: A Historical Analysis of U.S. Supreme Court Justices’ Framing of First Amendment Press Rights to Cover and Access Court Proceedings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1